SouthNYfan

Jesus man. How much of that 'bama Viagra did you take?? The erection had definitely lasted more than 4 hours.

I'll not here to debate who is better My point was darnold should sit for 1 year is accepted across the board Allen for minimum 1, maybe 2 So your assertion that the bills signed aj mccarron as a backup to use a day 1 starter would then eliminate darnold by your logic as well That was my point

Right. I think it's to push the browns to get him. It's pretty much accepted that darnold should get a year on the bench though...

Right? Highlight videos are like taking somebody's Instagram at face value. You know that chick is filtering and air brushing so those photos.

The caller was too level headed.

Is that saban's mom??

He is taking the "saban strategy" of ignoring things you don't want to deal with, like how saban ignores recruiting good QBs. You mean all 77 career attempts in 8 games played? All time great, obviously. Also, serious question: Isyour Alabama butt plug "home" or "away" colors??

Tebow was like 35-6, won two titles, and a Heisman. I think Andrew luck was basically the same record as luck. Are they the same QB? You're a complete moron.

If mahomes sucks, Watson sucks when he returns, and we don't get a QB/our QB this year sucks? B+ If the we get a QB who winds up better than Watson/mahomes? A+ If mahomes is great or Watson is great and we don't get a great QB this year? F!!

You left out anything regarding Rudolph/Lauletta/white.

So will the other GM's for letting Rosen slip to #12 Or It'll be like Steve Harvey reading the miss America

Was just thinking that

She ain't messin' with no broke...

Yep. There will also be stars within the top 4 . This thread is dumb.

Yeah. Then you have to add up everything you gave up to get each pick, for example. -#21 + cordy +5th (#158) was that #12 cost (we also got a 6th #187. Should keep that number it's MURDER ?) So if we trade to #7 by giving (just saying): #12 and #22 , at minimum that means we actually gave up #21, #22, #158 and cordy Glenn for the #7 pick. Again I'm not saying that is what it would cost to go to #7 I'm just saying that's how you have to look at it Just because one team overpaid doesn't mean we have to Yeah I don't think it would cost a ton, but see my response above at the total cost. Right I agree. But Cleveland could go Barkley #1 leaving Darnold #2 to NYG, then Jets have Mayfield/Allen/Rosen choice at #3, leaving browns with the remaining 2 to choose from

His girlfriend Katie got some big ol' t*tties. She got it on good with Lysol too.

Yep. I said it on another thread. I believe the only QB the Giants want is Darnold, but that they also could be in on Barkley. If browns go Allen #1, Giants almost certainly will take Darnold #2. If browns go Darnold, Giants want Barkley, but might move for a big haul.

Chad from "mad real world" was a cool dude.

Agreed.

I would be okay with him sitting for a bit depending on who it is. Rosen and Mayfield could roll day #1 Allen, Jackson, Rudolph, darnold should all sit. (I'm not avocatingfor any in particular here, just saying that having them sit isn't a terrible idea) Goff sat for a bit his rookie year.

So do the Giants with Eli and his two rings. It works sometimes, sometimes it doesn't. Just like every draft pick. It's less detrimental now with the rookie wage scale I think. Another important factor is that bad teams usually have a bad QB, so they aren't willing to part with the top pick. This year was an exception with the colts and Giants both in the top 5, who both might pass on a QB and be willing to trade down (colts already moved down a couple spots) Broncos might be willing as well, then after that, all the teams from 6-11 are set at qb and might be willing to trade back as well.

Bortles tried, but missed the table

Awesome.

That's fair. I think that's moot though, as I cannot see him being there at #12. Cleveland and NYG hold the keys to it all. If Cleveland takes Allen, then what? NYG go Darnold and sit him a year? That leaves only Mayfield or Rosen available after #3, with the Jets taking one, and Denver probably grabbing the remainder if they like him. Does NYG go Barkley then, letting Darnold, Rosen, and Mayfield all shift down to the Jets and broncos, now leaving the remainder to fall? Maybe the broncos don't take one, then two of them fall? This draft is completely crazy.

Interesting. What about later in the first, if say, he's available at #12 (which he won't be) assuming we cannot trade up? I feel you there. I think that sometimes you have to go with the risk though. I know it's a gamblers' mentality, but the payoff could be the next Favre instead of a mid-level, above average guy. Again, I'm not advocating for or against the guy, but I wouldn't be upset if we took him, just like I wouldn't be upset if we took a different QB.