SouthNYfan

He had the worst 3 game stretch of any "first 3 starts" in recent history at least. as per Bill Barnwell after the last game: "Unsurprisingly, Peterman is off to the worst start of any young quarterback in recent memory. He has been unable to finish each of his first three starts, as he was benched against the Chargers in the five-interception games last season and then again against the Ravens on Sunday (he was injured after starting against the Colts last season). Going back through 2001, Peterman's 16.8 passer rating across his first three starts is the worst for any passer, comfortably behind Alex Smith (29.4) and Brooks Bollinger (37.0). The best passer rating for any passer through three starts over that time frame, ironically, belongs to Taylor"

this actually hurt my soul.

I assumed paint by numbers.

Let me know how that goes when he gets hurt. Our offensive line is a complete trainwreck.

The entire offense is the problem.

They gave up 38 points. Not 48. They also have a very very good dline. They didn't have bosa. Bosa might not play next week either. If he doesn't play we will only get sacked 6x instead of 10x. Chiefs had an above average oline last year, which looks even better this year. They also have one of the best offenses in football. Our oline is a pile of crap at best. Our offense sucks.

I voted nate should start but won't. My premise that he should stat has nothing to do with anything other than I don't want Allen killed against the chargers dline. Np sucks, but I'm okay with giving Chum to the sharks for a couple of weeks until we get past the death-dlines upcoming.

Can we just change the names on all our wr, oline and dline jerseys to "e.coli" since they are both sh*t.

Maclin and Dez are still better than any wr on our roster.

Yes definitely go bills! It's cool. I'm overly detailed and relentless. It actually helps me with my job as a PT, but often affects my personal relationships. On a side note, Alex Smith was almost as bad as Peterman in his first 3 NFL starts, and turned into a late bloomer. Maybe np can turn it around. Not willing to bet the farm (or even my lunch money) on it though. Seems like a good, hard working kid. I hope he finds his groove. I'm not gonna hold my breath though

I'm a detail whore because I'm OCD btw, I really can't help it. Wife gets mad at me about it all the time. I just don't put much stock in AJM's Cincinnati time because he was in a stacked offense. Kind of like Matt Cassel with his limited time in NE, Flynn in GB. I mean we also put stock in rob Johnson's limited regular season sample too. We can agree to disagree on that though. Let's also agree to disagree on who earned the start. Let's meet in the middle and agree on some stuff though: -we should have kept AJM simply because np, regardless of preseason, was still very much a "this guy might still suck" player -if we kept AJM we could have put him in and at least seen what he could do in the regular season -our oline and wr corps both are atrocious -we need another QB because, even if Allen is okay starting, np isn't even a viable backup That cool?

What about Webster? **At the bills price**

That's why I didn't agree with cutting him. We are paying him to play for somebody else. We basically just gave Cleveland a 7th round pick to pay for the pats wr Brilliant.

Well he wasn't able to learn our playbook, so at least he can't tell them that inside info ?

Agreed I was saying they all suck though Did you refer to Star as "Tolbert on defense"? Either you made a mistake that was unintentionally hilarious Or You made a hilarious joke that he was just as worthless of a panther singing Either way I say we start referring to all former Panther-bills garbage by some combination with "Tolbert" We can call star: "starbert" "Tolvin" for Kelvin ??

It wasn't. You said AJM had more TDs and more yards, he didn't. Peterman had the same # of TDs, more yards by a significant amount, and had 0 turnovers vs 2 int for AJM this preseason. Np completed 80% of his passes vs 45%. Peterman simply had a better preseason. I don't give a crap what AJM did 3 years ago with the Bengals, which was done with a ridiculous supporting cast in one if the top3 stacked offenses that year. Matt Flynn threw like 7 TDs in one game 5 years ago. Should we go sign him (again) too? BOTH AJM and np suck. Np earned the start. We shouldn't have traded AJM. It was idiotic to put all the eggs in the np basket, at least we can agree on that, but let's stop acting like we traded away Steve young.

Still waiting.

He had a 0.0 pass rating. Do they go negative??

Dunkirk!? Where you been man!?

Can we give that te a shot at QB? He can't be much worse, right?

That's like asking with news was worse: -getting fired -cancer -hiv -dog died -house burned down -tupac got shot -the Beatles broke up -snape killed Dumbledore -mcdonalds discontinued schezuan sauce again They all suck.

They both suck. We should have help mccarron. Peterman earned the start. That's all there is to it. We are arguing which pile of sh*t smells worse at this point. Peterman: 33/41 (80.5%) 431 yards 3 td 0 int. Sacked 2 times Mccarron: 23/50 (46%) 293 yards 3 td 2 int. Sacked 7 times Please tell me how he had more yards and generated the most points? I'll be here waiting.

Mccarron was throwing to the best receiving corps in the league, a high powered offense including a stud rb at the time and a great line. Most QBs would look that good in that group. If teams don't game plan for QBs, please explain to me why mccarron looked like dogsh*t in the preseason? That's right, because he sucks too. Peterman just sucked less in the preseason and practice.

Based on preseason many of us said the oline, dline, dbacks outside of poyer/hyde/tre and WRs sucked Guess what? The preseason was right.