Jump to content

xxxxxxxx

Community Member
  • Posts

    394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by xxxxxxxx

  1. Dear Internet detective keyboard warrior. Merriam webster sucks. HARD. Its a silly American Dictionary, with no etymological context. No one who knows anything about etymology (look that word up too) or semantics gives a crap about what it says. Its used by grade school kids, so I think your quoting a definition meant for 4th graders. Try looking the word up in the Oxford, the 4th (legal) definition might surprise you. Then stop telling people to do research. Because your research is at the level of an elementary school student who just learned how to google, but doesn't have the attention span to read beyond a few sentences.
  2. This just in. Plausible is a synonym for likely, reasonable, and believable. So if your shocked that someone took issue with your choice of words, then you are using words that sound smart to you without understanding how they are defined.When you say plausible you are asserting an above average degree of believability not a remote possibility. No one, including the police or McCoy have made the assertion that she did it herself, yet you see no problem with waxing poetically over the fact that such an outcome, which is rare and unlikely, is in your eyes perfectly plausible. Its sloppy reasoning dressed up to sound smart, and a potential indicator of some baggage that you might be dragging along that makes you question women, who may have gone through pretty traumatic experiences, regularily, because yor more concerned about your football team than the effect that your suspicians may have on a potential victim of violence.
  3. It is a ****ty thing to do to someone who has potentially gone through a traumatic experience. Cause if your wrong, and you probably are, they also have to deal with all the **** talk, rumors, and dirt thrown at them in addition to having the crap kicked out of them. Your pals can give you all the likes you want, but I wager that most decent folk would agree with me, and that what you and your fellow internet sleuths are doing is reckless and ****ty.
  4. Every single time you insist that a potential victim of violence might have done it themselves you judge them. If you have reservations, you can keep them to youself, most sensible folk do that, instead of demanding proof.
  5. Oh wow. One story. I bet you use this one all the time. Your cute.
  6. You've certainly jugged the potential victim quite harshly. And no all of the situations that you are mentioning are not equally possible given precidents. You watch too many movies dude. People are rarely framed for crimes. People commonly beat the crap out if their exes though or do something ****ty to an exe that !@#$s them up to get back at them. Ask any one in law enforcement to offer an opinon on that one.
  7. I don't know and I suspect that you don't know either. And I'm not about to take the internets word for it. Either way these things can be checked out. Having a friend file an eviction notice and not your lawyer when you are a millionaire sounds a bit off and silly, but it could have happened. What's specified could matter in court, but all he needs is charges filed and he's likely gone. And if that is in fact the document the return of items sentence could be enough to charge him. And thats the red flag, because you don't usually ask for items to be returned on an eviction notice. And thats the point that all the reporters are making. Most landlords don't include items when they rent a place, and theft is usually covered by security deposits if the place is furnished. ITS A HARD FACT, dispute it all you want. It would not have been reported if it wasn't so.
  8. They exist, usually. The reports could be false, I guess, but local reporters can get access to that stuff. They don't post it online, usually. AND no, I'm not going to the court myself to check the transcript if there is one. Your making some pretty grand leaps of faith here: the very fact that he asked for the return of items in court will likely be admissable as evidence, and that makes it harder for him to deny any knowledge or connection to a break in. That is the point. Good day.
  9. The items are contested, but he asked for items returned. The items might have be specified in court transcripts, verbally by his lawyer, and the journalists who report on this stuff usually check that stuff. Drop the sleuthing, please. Its a waste of time. I'm not going to the court house to pull the transcripts just to appease your suspicions.
  10. Ok. Stop the troll. The doc says return items in his handwriting. That is what was talking about.
  11. Over a year. Uh oh. Someone didnt clear their story with Mom. This looks really bad now. Damn.
  12. No. It was in the court order he filed. What you are saying is not corect, I think your confused and stubnorn. Peace, I'm out.
  13. Read please. Already covered.
  14. Demand of returned items, was filed. As has been quoted by others. He's screwed.
  15. Nope. Its not. He said she said is when you don't have records. There are court records. He might think that and you might think that, but its not the same thing. They don't have to go on her word when they can cite legal proceedings as evidence.
  16. a court order that he filed is concrete though. Thats the problem that will likely end his career. He will have difficulty getting out of this, and she will probably also go after him in civil court. I can't see a team keeping him around given the media circus this will create. Its the reality of the world we now live in.
  17. It doesnt matter to the NFL if it was established or not; the point is that it will be hard for him to deny involvement if he had already asked for the same items in court.
  18. Report posted above. Rodrak. Irregardless of what happened, that could be enough to try him on. And he doesn't need to even be charged for the incident to be considered detrimental to the league. Its my opinon, of course. But if he had requested womans jewelery returned but says she was just a tenant I don't see a cop or the league buying it.
  19. Yeah, the items stolen were items he had requested in a court order. He's screwed. Gone. Out of the league. Will never play again. What a meathead. He will be lucky if he avoids jail.
  20. Yeah. I will be surprised if the first statement from the team is not that he is being released immediately.
  21. Almost never happens. That could be the case, sure, but it would be a rare one, and really hard to prove-unless she had prior arrests for similar behavior and spoke openly about it. More likely is that he agreed to let a woman live with him rent free that he was sleeping with and didn't know that when you do that it can be really difficult to get her to leave when you stop sleeping with her and she doesn't want to, especially if she doesn't have alot of money, she has a kid to support, and the place is expensive. Those cases are way more common (they happen every day). So yeah, if you want to believe him, feel free, but his story sounds like total b.s, and will sound like b.s to the cops.
  22. My point is that these laws can be pretty complicated. And if they were in a relationship and living together there are alot of laws and precidents which could apply. She, more likely than not, is in a different legal situation based on having been romantically linked. And you can't just go on statutes, common law rulings made in Georgia likely apply. I cant speak on Georgia, but there are a lot of places where you can't move in with someone who your in a relationship with and demand that they leave when you break up. She might not have paid rent ever, and he probably owns the place.
  23. Not if they were common law partners. Those distinctions vary based on jurisdiction. If they were in a relationship and living together its a whole different ball game.
  24. He was dumb enough to file a court order asking for the return of objects. He's done, out of the league, and will never play again. And he will probably go to jail.
  25. And he's entering his prime. It will be fun to see what they can do together. Seriously, some folk on here need to get their heads checked and realise that their are other teams in the league that are not the bills. If Landry plays well alot of weight will be taken of Tyrods shoulders, and its Cleveland people, optimism is all they have.
×
×
  • Create New...