Radar

Don't want him even close to Bills. Super talent with character of an ally cat. No thanks!!!!

Potential? I would hope better if we give up what it looks like it would take. Heck, Peterman has potential.

Or you don't want to hear it? I'm not against trading up if our front office evaluates a guy high enough to do it but none of these Quarterbacks seems to have "can't miss" after his name. The hype has been exaggerated at the least. Do agree another thread is unnecessary.

Man I get so sick of "blue collar". Just get a quarterback.Also sick of the anti Christian remarks. Let's find an atheist if that's what satisfies everyone.

Are you considering that the team's we need to trade up to get that Qb with aren't interested in trading down? I'm not sure we can get into the top six even if they want to.

Back to you.

Maybe tomorrow it will be your kin and we'll just say relax.

I wonder if you are thinking logically or wishful in your thinking. My personal thinking (logically) is the Giants would not rather have 12 and 22.

Bye, bye, my friend.

Another wise a.. This forum is getting over loaded with them. Why don't you put me on ignore because I'll happily add you to my growing list.

Hopefully no on Trump and hopefully soon for the Sabres. Now was your response in anyway related to my post?

I'll rain on the parade. No way are we going to move up to #2. Giants will not trade that pick. I can't see a scenario where the Browns trade either #1 or #4 to us but still could see movement between the #1-4 teams. If we take a quarterback in first round unless one of the top four prospects drops unexpectedly below #6 say probably we're left with someone like Jackson and the way it's looking he could be gone by the time we pick and can't see moving up to get him.

I think our team has more holes in it apparently than many of our posters. Agree.

Please consider that these quarterbacks aren't being described by many as sure bet franchise quarterbacks. Also until now the cost of trading up wasn't actually known and now that it is Do you really think one of these guys is worth gambling your draft board on and if you're wrong setting the team back years possibly?

I'm against trading up for what cost would be. None of these quarterbacks is such a sure thing to warrant what it would require to get to top four picks. Everyone of these guys have enough question marks to make them a huge risk for the price. Seems like this would set our team back years if the pick doesn't turn out to be more than just a good quarterback.

I like this thinking. Not saying these quarterbacks won't be good just that I'm not that sure about any of them to give up the picks to get one. There seems not to be a consensus #1 in the group and all of them have what appears to have question marks. As much as we have the need it, to me, is a huge risk to gut your assets for a . guy that's not a sure thing or close to it. There isn't a Andrew Luck type prospect amount this class. I will support whatever they do but personally would not move up to 2-4 for what it's obviously going to take.Just my opinion.

Please remove his name from the wall. Don't give me this bull "oh, it's based on his play" crap. He's not to be looked up to at all.

Better question would be is their a good one. Drought on .media guys here worst than our playoff drought was.

How could he know now. He has to find one of three teams(I assume) willing to trade down for what the Bills are willing to give. That I believe is yet to be determined so Bean' s responses were what I would expect. Fans that expect him to say "yeah, we're trading up" well that's never going to happen.

I don't know a whole lot personally about these prospects other than from media reports. They can create a franchise player once it has time to snowball in the fan base. So, I hope the scouts of the team know and don't react to the buildup that could be over done. Every draft we have guys drop down that were reported to be great. So if we give up all these assets to get a guy I'm trusting the guys in the front office and not a mock draft or Mel Kiper guys who get paid to draw listeners.

We understand it's an opinion but opinions normally are based on something.

I think Moore as a signing makes most sense. McCarron or Bridgewater are probably next on my list. I thought McCowen but he stayed put with Jets.

Why? He seems a good fit as a transitional guy. The other two want starting jobs and Moore is not that bad for short term.

I've stated before that I'm a veteran of Viet Nam era and I personally feel that I defended the rights for any citizen to express their opinions openly. I respect Colin for using that constitutional right but having said that I'm not for signing him. I do hope someone does. Please no phoney wave flagging patriotism the NFL owners have enough of those. For the record I'm a white so it's not a racial thing with me.

Sorry.