Jump to content

Ron Burgundy

Community Member
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Ron Burgundy's Achievements

UDFA

UDFA (2/8)

2

Reputation

  1. When you face a killer pass rush or just can't block you throw quick passes. I dont think we have a qb even capable of doing that.
  2. Really?? It's the true fans that only come around when they are winning? I think you're confusing true fans with bandwagon fans. I'm not saying there isn't a certain element at games to just get wasted but if you're only supporting a team when they are good you are a crap fan.
  3. Unless it's a smoke screen. But then maybe they WANT you to think it's a smoke screen and it's real. I'm only half joking i'm sure a crap ton of this goes on.
  4. I can't believe this is being asked in any way, shape, or form. One of the worst droughts in pro sports and we ended the season with plenty of draft capital. You gotta be one of those people that want to tank every year.
  5. Makes sense with them trading JPP to go after an elite pass rusher. I'd still trade down a bit and still try and get Chubb.
  6. Yes! For a minute i was thinking what if we took the best two DT's in the draft and built a dominant DEF but we could save a pick and pick up Mo. There'll be multiple teams interested in him though.
  7. I'm trying to make sense of it from a Colts perspective and this is the only way it makes sense. The Colts need a lot of pieces with or without Luck. He can turn their offense around but their Def is terrible. They have a high pick to replace him so maybe one of the QBs in the draft has caught their eye and they will stockpile resources while replacing their QB? It's not that far fetched. Just a little crazy.
  8. I love the idea of getting Vea. RB so early though I'm not so sure. Why go RB early when you can snag one in the 4th - 6th? I would maybe go Vea and and O linemen depending on how the chips fall. Or, if we want to just go nuts on DEF. Go two DT's! That'll imrpove the DEF for sure.
  9. Yes but why didn't we call plays to nullify the pass rush? Whenever the Pats play a super stout pass rush they go with quick passes. Do the playcallers not trust Tyrod with quick passes? I mean, it could be the receivers not able to get separation for those routes, I genuinely am interested. Again, I'm not a Tyrod hater and the blame should not be mostly on him.
  10. I see his biggest flaw as not being adept at the quick pass. Throw in some quick passes into the game-plan yesterday and you nullify that pass rush. The loss yesterday was definitely not on his shoulders but franchise quarterbacks can lead their team to wins at times when their team is playing poorly. I don't think TT can do that. I like him, I want to keep him and still draft a QB of the future but he's not a franchise QB.
  11. We might be 2-1 if we still had them both.
  12. Before the calls starting going our way there were a few against us that were complete BS. As far as I'm concerned there were blown calls that went both ways. It irks me that people are making such a big deal of the Von Miller penalty. Sure it was huge but it didn't win us the game, we were ahead by that point and our defense was playing really well obviously. Even if we don't get points and run the clock down there they don't get an automatic win if that call isn't made. The refs didn't hand us a win if that's what you're thinking. Denver played poorly but we also played well and we're improving on both sides of the ball.
×
×
  • Create New...