@ExiledInIllinois total disregard for stopping invasive species has reached its peak. What could be next?
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/7/14/20694241/east-half-humboldt-park-close-animal-control-attempts-capture-alligator
And, Brady has shown he is a successful QB. He would be elsewhere. Where else has Belichick been a HC? How successful was he?
You’re the one touting your man, your disdain for Brady is because of all the beat downs HE has given this team.
I can’t argue with illogic. You either see it or you don’t. You don’t see it or you’re playing your natural troll game.
Well, WTF did he say? OP @plenzmd1starts a thread and promises updates. What do we get? Bupkus.
Hopefully a mod will find this travesty and shut it down.
If you believe that JP Losman, EJ Manual, Trent Edwards et al would thrive, allowing Belichick to be dynastic then you’re nuts.
It’s the QB.
Perhaps. What successful QBs have they drafted in that time?
You have Belichick and the succession of Bills QBs who have started in his tenure. Are we still talking dynasty?
Only one piece changes over the course of his run there. One tiny piece. Is he still a genius?
I’m happy to admit when I’m wrong. I’m just as happy to argue when people answer a flawed question incorrectly. And whilst (A&FM) we’re at it, please refute my points.
And your bottom paragraph is why the answer is Brady. Name me another HOF QB who would put up w what he has and never asked for the most money?
It does not work without Brady.
Ever hear of Bob Griese?
Dungy would not be on the list without Manning.
Vermeil would not be on the list without Warner.
i won’t entertain somebody’s 20+ best.
so, Gibbs is the one outlier out of 15.
Nope. It's both, but without Brady Belichick is nothing special. You must have that QB.
Give me a list of your top coaches NFL all time. What do they have in common?
The blips were at the QB position. Other rental players don't matter.
You answered your own question regarding Cassel. His 'success' was unsustainable. Brady's success has been sustained.