shoshin

It's a mistake. Crap happens. Rob--thank you for your answer. As a follow-up, do you think it's a problem that people go chasing outlets that reflect their whims? I ask because I watch almost no TV news except when there's a true breaking story (the election results last week is the first time I can recall watching the news in years). I was switching between Fox and CNN, and preferred Fox's coverage for the most part, but did think CNN did better with their country wall of data (my personal opinion there is an aside). But here's my query: We have the competing outlets, many feeding the far extremes: MSNBC on one end, OAN/NewsMax on the others, with varying degrees in the middle. And now the new feeder of Twitter, which democratizes the news for better (rarely) and worse (often). What are your thoughts about how to avoid the social media/news media echo chambers? My true concern, off topic from this thread's topic, is that the algorithms and machines are getting really good at making us see what we agree with, and in so doing, we are less inclined to do any listening to the other side, whoever they are. You can see it here, where your lot, mostly in an echo chamber at PPP, went off and formed a deeper echo chamber. But that's happening everywhere.

Not to sound like the dearly departed friends, but you're insane. No one has tried an education and community building campaign from the top. No one.

Yes. The evidence so far is nil. What would happen with the Supreme Court? There's no case pending anywhere that would overturn a single state, let alone an election. Many states will certify their results in the next 10 days. Tick tock to find tens of thousands of fraudulent votes.

Does it concern you at all that the voice Republicans used to believe and listen to (FOXNews), became the enemy once they reported news that its viewers didn't want to hear, so they just found other "news" sources? I mean this sincerely since most your type ran away from dissenting voices.

That you Dragoon? Aren't you a peach?

Jesus wept no. The way to proceed is through education about the pandemic, discussion of how to best protect people, and getting actual buy in. We should not be frigging jailing non-mask wearers FFS.

Then why aren't showing it in court with a hot and pressing urgency to do so?

The post office guy and Rudy’s grainy photos aren’t evidence? Twitter believes.

No doubt. Two wrongs don’t make this right. And last election, Clinton conceded the next day. Obama had Trump to the White House. And the election was closer.

Clinton conceded the next day. Obama had Trump to the White House 2 days after the election. And Clinton’s loss was closer than this one. Dems lost their minds. The leaders did the tight thing and put country first. Through gritted teeth. But they did it.

So you're saying you want an investigation without evidence to justify the investigation. Some would call that a fishing expedition. You do an investigation based on evidence. To do an investigation without evidence is what police states do. Hillary lost by less than Trump and conceded.

They hated him, but they also acknowledged his win. Hillary conceded even though her margin was much closer than Trump's. Obama had him to the White House 2 days after Election Day. He started getting his briefings right away. So yes, the left melted down and it continued to today. But they also respected the election result. As it happens, only one candidate said the 2016 election was fraudulent: Donald J. Trump, who said that he won the popular vote and that 3-5 million of Hillary's votes were fraudulent. So confident was he, he formed a commission. That found, wait for it, no fraudulent votes. Wah, wah, waaaaah.

The political cause going forward is great. The charity is donating to bail someone out of the debt they already incurred. That's the heart-touching part!

Holy christ you're a fun troll account! Good on ya!

Helping pay off the losing campaign's debt--Noble of you but I'd think your charitable donations could be better spent.

Is there a secret case that's been filed somewhere with the proof of tens of thousands of votes fraudulently cast then? I feel like that would be big news, not a secret.

"60% of each contribution first to Save America, up to $5,000/$5,000, then to DJTP's (Donald J. Trump for President's) Recount Account, up to a maximum of $2,800/$5,000.40% of each contribution to the RNC's Operating account, up to a maximum of $35,500/$15,000. Any additional funds will go to the RNC for deposit in the RNC's Legal Proceedings account or Headquarters account, up to a maximum of $213,000/$90,000."

The post office guy!!!

60% of it. Seems legit.

But the post office guy!

Is there a lawsuit anywhere with tens of thousands of votes being requested to be overturned and change the result of the election yet? Waiting...

That's some source. There is no mandatory recount at 0.5% in all of those states. Completely inaccurate. AZ only does a mandatory recount at less than 0.1%. Right now it's at 0.4% PA does a recount at 0.5%. It's at 0.7%. NV is at 2.7%, don't know its laws because...who cares, it's not even close enough to be in any conversation. MI is at 2.5%, don't know its laws because...who cares, it's not even close enough to be in any conversation. GA will do a recount. WI will seemingly also do a recount if Trump requests and donors (suckers) pay for it. Still waiting to see the evidence of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes from 2020. I expect to wait about as long as I've been waiting to see the millions of votes he said were fraudulently cast for Hillary.

A college degree is only a sign of schooling, not judgment or compassion.

Two wrongs won't make it right if the Dems try to pack the Supreme Court either. Rule holds.

Two wrongs don’t make this right. Trump won. Biden won.