Jump to content

Ozymandius

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ozymandius

  1. Yup.  Both QBs would succeed in spite of what system they played in.  Some systems would make them more successful, but they would still be great QBs.  You can't say the same for Brady.

    216807[/snapback]

     

    care to expand on what Brady can't do?

     

    the only system Brady might not succeed in is a college option running system... Vick and Culpepper might be better in those systems

  2. LOL, you'd seriously take Culpepper and Vick over Brady? This isn't Madden, it's real football.

     

    Brady has more assets than just good field vision and a quick release, although those are very important. Brady is also extremely good at feeling the rush and sliding his feet to avoid it and set up his blockers (Bill Walsh said Brady is the most mobile QB in the league), and he's extremely accurate and a great leader. Basically, everything we've ever wanted in a QB, he has, except the Bills jersey.

  3. I've been toying with that thought, but I really doubt it.

     

    I mean, we're CURSED.

     

    F the Red Sux, they have no idea what pain is. Pain is 4 straight SB losses. Pain is the Homerun Throwup. Pain is wide right, Flutie/Johnson, Bledsoe...

     

    But I'm gonna try it. I'm gonna see if it helps, I doubt it will though.

    216500[/snapback]

     

    I'll be rooting for the Eagles as well. Anyone rooting for them will almost certainly be disappointed since they're playing New England, but I think rooting for the Eagles is the right thing to do. You're correct that no one can really understand the pain of 4 straight SB losses, but they did approach the pain with their 3 straight CG losses. Both Buffalo and Philadelphia care too much about football so we're also similar in that respect. Their fanbase deserves another heartbreak about as much as we deserve one. Go Eagles

  4. A key to the game will be whether the Patriots are allowed to play two deep safeties like they did against Pittsburgh. The Steelers have run on everyone this year, and if they can run on the Pats front 7, then New England will have to give saftey support, opening up the downfield passing game.

     

    One of the keys to New England's destruction of the Colts was that their defensive line and linebackers, even without Seymour, was able to control the Colts offensive lineman sans safety help. I don't think they'll have that luxury against Pittsburgh.

  5. Bruschi is a stud... two of the lasting images from that game are 1) Bruschi taking the ball away from Rhodes and 2) on Indy's final drive, Burschi still playing fercociously, inciting the crowd, and after a Colt caught the ball along the sideline, he was like a gopher on acid, repeatedly burrowing his arms into the guy's chest trying to knock the ball loose.

  6. I agree that the Steelers have a much better chance of winning than the Colts.

     

    When you play against Belichick, the simpler and more run-oriented your offense is, the better you will do. That's why Carolina had success moving the ball in the Super Bowl against the Pats. They kept it simple; they ran the ball and took some shots downfield. Likewise, Pittsburgh will pound the ball and pound the ball and then take their shots downfield with Burress.

     

    Pittsburgh's receivers are much more physical and clutch. You will not see Hines Ward dropping balls over the middle like the Colts wideouts.

×
×
  • Create New...