Jump to content

Pbomb

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pbomb

  1. If cleveland really wants him they will probably offer something, if he hits fa he will probably choose to go somewhere else unless they way overpay in which case his current contract will be cheaper. Not sure about a first but i could see a second or third or multiple mid rounders. bradford got a first and i dont think hes much better

  2. I see him as more of an all round guy than an edge rusher in the way Mack is. To me Reddick is more like this year's Deion Jones or Darron Lee. He is a better pass rusher than Jones or Lee but I don't think he is a big sack number guy at the NFL level I think he fits inside in a 3-4 and as the WLB in a 4-3 who gives you superb athleticism and some pass rush adaptability.

    thanks, thats what i thought. If we lose zb he would be a good second round target
  3. If you gentlemen aren't interested in further discussion on the topic of TT and the QB future don't open or comment on them. Its pretty easy,.

    they are not complaining about talking about tyrod but yet another new thread that brings it up when this could have been posted in one of those many other existing threads
  4. You may want to take in to account that it is probably completely made up by someone who is shilling for "marquee" teams live Denver and constantly runs down "inferior" teams like the Bills before you blame Whaley for something he hasn't even done.

    i love when people bash whaley for rumors and stuff that he hasnt even done. Makes it pretty obvious the guy can do no right to them and he is simply next in line for people to blame to get their agenda across
  5. What you're failing to touch on is our resources. Letting a CB go via free agency and spending a first rd pick to replace him is getting us nowhere, is basically what you're saying, right? What's not being said is that we are going to use the 13-15 million we would've spent on Gilmore on the positions we would've spent our draft picks on. Only instead of getting one player for 13-25 million, we will have 2-3 players. It's a numbers game. And right now we have MANY free agents that either started or played significant snaps. How do we replace them if we use over half of our cap room on 1 player? We can't. We'd have the worst depth in the league. The league in which injuries are the norm and depth is necessary. While I would like to keep Gilmore, the numbers game just doesn't match up. No matter how you spin it, there's no way we can pay Gilmore what he wants and fill out the roster with solid players, unless we hit on all of our draft picks and minimum salary free agents. The likelihood of that happening is close to zero imo. We can't put ourselves in a position where we have little to no cap room in a year or 2, just like we are this year.

    plus we should get a 3rd round comp pick for him next year too
  6. Why do people want to get rid of players just because they are old: kyle, mccoy for a rb, and lorax. Why dont we wait til their play actually starts to decline, all three had arguably their best seasons. I remember we got rid of fat pat williams causd he was old, went on to dominate in minnesota for years. While i agree we shouldnt overpay for lorax if he will resign for 3-6 mil a year why wouldnt you, great leadership & effort and he produces. Also depth as a edgerusher which after shaq and hughes we have none

  7. I think the Bills are tired of bumping along at 7-9 or 8-8 year after year. They put together incomplete teams and lose games that winners win.

     

    Shady is a great back and the Bills are clearly better with him on the field. But they can't win consistently with a RB-centric offense. To be fair to Shady, who deserves a shot at a ring, the Bills should trade him to a serious contender. He's only got a couple of years left before the legs start to go, and he can spend those years watching the Bills finish third or fourth in the AFCE, or possibly turning a strong team into a SB winner.

     

    The Bills have been assembling a Camaro when they need a Corvette. Right now they have a Camaro with a couple of Corvette parts (Shady, Watkins) but they need the whole car to be effective. Better to be a Prius for a year and turn the whole thing around. Shedding Shady would hurt us in the short term, but help him and maybe help us in the long term.

     

    but tanking and rebuilding doesnt always work. Look at jacksonville for example, always picks in the top 5 or 10 and still continues to suck. Leftwich, gabbert, and now probably bortles were all top 10 franchise qbs that didnt work out
  8. From what I understand, DW and the personnel department send out daily emails to all 53 players updating them on what they're considering.

     

    I'm sorry, major, but this sounds like bunk. Shady and Watkins both on the trading block - our only two offensive weapons? And you heard this from a player? Because players know what DW is thinking ("considering")?

     

    None of this makes any sense.

     

    i knew it was just a matter of time til watkins is gone started. I think that about covers all our good players so far this offseason
  9. Whaley gave the eagles crap( Busted up Kiko ) he was a genius in that trade. Why cut a playmaker when you can cut both Kyle Williams and Eric woods saving us close to 14 mill in cap space

    i dont understand why people want to cut our good players. We can cut graham, carpenter, easley, and lewis and almost free up 10 mil. Instead of cutting our best players we can restructure 4-5 of them to free up another 5 mil giving us almost 40 mil in cap room. Why do we want to have 70 mil in cap room but no good players
×
×
  • Create New...