Pbomb
-
Posts
1,296 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Pbomb
-
-
What no bills? Totally unrealistic
-
agreed, almost every team has 0 to 1 player left. Even the great belicheck only has one leftThe Dolphins have no one left from 2013 either. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/04/01/dolphins-entire-2013-draft-class-is-gone/
Just a bad crop all the way around. Can't blame Nix or Whaley for that
-
Remember when ralph was owner and people complained how we never spent our cap, now we spend our cap and its probably those same people who are complaining
-
I would definatly trade down if possible. Being able to trade down multiple times would be incredible but probably not very likely
-
i hate when the writers make you click through ten pages to see a listHere's a idea, write a summary with the outcome then put the link as backup.
-
this has to be upsetting for the whaley hatersPegula dismisses Lacanfora report as "erroneous"
-
give it up dude, i thought there would be a break til atleast the next jlc article but i guess notSo, LaCanfora says McDermott has growing cache with ownership, could be bringing in VPs or personnel figures with ties to the coach in the near future, and that the marriage likely isn't built to last.
And then McDermott says that Whaley and he worked together on all this and neither could have done it alone, that it's been a total team effort, and that "Doug and I have had healthy conversations, productive conversations, and I look forward to doing that moving forward." And that the team will speak with one voice.
And people hear McDermott's comments and say, "See, LaCanfora was wrong, and there's no problem." Really?
Does nobody notice that both of those could easily be 100% true, that they are not contradictory? They are not.
Did McDermott say how far forward he will move with Whaley? Did he say there will be no new VPs or personnel figures? Folks, this is good PR, but McDermott didn't contradict LaCanfora's report. He didn't say there isn't conflict. And he certainly didn't guarantee Whaley's future with the Bills will be long or filled with power.
-
this guy hasnt been banned yet?I rest my case. Low-brow, low-class, an extension of Appalachia. That's all Western New York is.
-
Not only are there alot of teams that need qbs now there are also a bunch that will be looking for their qb of the future to groom like pitt, n.o., nyg, and ari. If we want one of the top qbs the only safe way to get one is at 10
-
adds some more depth at de with some potential, good move
-
Does 8-8 and being in the hunt count as success
-
everyone is entitled to their opinion. I always thought marrone was a brandon hire and rex was also a pegulas and brandon favorite. While whaley im sure had input i believe didnt have the final say on either. But that is just my opinionBy that logic, Was Whaley not GM when Rex Ryan was hired? Then it was a move made by him. Was Whaley not GM when Doug Marrone was hired? Then it was a move made by him.
-
ej was only in his second year in 2014, hard to give up on a first round pick after half a year. maybe they shouldnt have brought in orton. If ej would have played all year then ya the bills would haved sucked but atleast everyone would know for sure ej wasnt any good then they could have moved on sooner and would have had alot better draft pick. Instead we got orton and finished 9-7 cause marrone wanted to save face.That was last season.
He went into the 2014 season with EJ, Tuel and Palmer as his QBs before Orton was signed. Rex brought in Tyrod, not Whaley.
He's mostly ignored the most valuable position in the league. It's inexcusable.
And again was whaley not gm when tyrod was added, then it was a move made by him.
-
well you hate everything about the bills so no wonder you dont agree with itIt's was actually a really bad article.
Whaley hired Schwartz? No.
Schwartz was a "savvy coach who adapted his scheme?" He ran the same scheme he's run his whole career.
-
he didnt. he added tyrod, drafted cardale, and probably will draft another this year or next.A lot of excuse making in this one.
Whaley would be long gone if Tyrod wasn't signed. He's done a bad job with the most valuable position in the league in QB.... the article puts its on Nix and then outline how bad that 2013 QB draft was. It doesn't excuse the fact Whaley simply stopped trying after Manuel was picked.
-
http://www.cover1.net/2017/03/eye-for-talent-period/
Good article about whaley
-
but it wont unfortunatelyThanks. That should end the thread
-
everyone is sleeping on himpoor Josh Woodrum
-
Using jlc as a source is ridiculous. And yet everytime he writes something the rest of the media eats it up
-
john murphy said it was fake news too. Cant believe people still believe jlc. If they were gonna get rid of whaley it would have been at the end of the year.Belichick is a great coach and a great GM. The Bills fans who try and insist he is just a hoodie with the GOAT at QB are deluding themselves.
On topic.... Leroi saying there is nothing in this is interesting. He doesn't quite bat 100 but he has a pretty good record of accuracy on this board.
From what ive seen it wasnt just whaley that didnt get along with marrone, it was monos, brandon, many players, and im sure many more so not sure i would blame whaley for that.
The arguing with rex was over the qb situation. Rex wanted tyrod so he could win meaningless games to save his job. Whaley was looking to the future to help the franchise. Once again i will take whaley side there as well.
Also belicheck is a good gm but makes plenty of bad moves as well, just like every gm in the league.
-
dealer doug, that would be a great trade!Doug will trade our first this year and next to Denver for Trevor Siemian.
-
We can probably add cahones as a udfa, hes not on any big boards ive seen
-
Who is this mahomes guy, i never heard of him. We need more topics and discussion about him i think
-
I hope more mahomes threads are made soon
compensatory picks counter for 2018 Billsy update.
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I think its a stupid formula, it should go by total amount of salaries per year not the number of players lost/added. You could lose 2 guys making $15 mil a year and add 2 guys who make $1 mil a year and you dont get anything, doesnt seem fair