Watkins101

With the 39th overall pick in the 2020 NFL draft, the San Francisco 49ers select Tyler Biadasz, IOL, Wisconsin. We lost our starting Right Guard from last year, and we believe Biadasz can come in and compete for that position. He fills a need, is one of the best players available, and has a top 5 name in the draft. @Might Rather and the Houston Texans are on the clock. The 49ers issue a public statement of frustration at the mods who snatched Diggs away from their clutches.

The San Francisco 49ers select Brandon Aiyuk, Wr, Arizona State. Some boards consider Aiyuk the best Non-Rb left. The 49ers have a need at Wr after Emmanuel Sanders left in free agency. This is a very desirable scenario for the 49ers, after they watched Ruggs and Jeudy go 14 and 15 when they had plans to move up to 16 for one of them. We expect a run of Wrs between this and our next pick, so this was the time to strike. @Buffalo716 and the Kansas City Chiefs are on the clock.

The Bills did not "let him walk". They traded him for Jordan Matthews and a 3rd.

Drafting a DL high because we are spending a lot of money on DL is dumb IMO. It's basically saying: we are spending a disproportionate amount of money on DL, so let's allocate a disproportionate amount of our one other resource, draft picks, on DL. It does not make sense. Now is it dumb to pick a DL player early? Not necessarily. Does it really even matter where our money/cheap talent(draft picks) is allocated? I understand it makes like easier if top dollar positions are filled with cheap talent (Cb1,DE1,Lt, QB) but as long as you can balance it out so that there are areas you are spending below average, to cancel the above average spending on DL and other positions, you should be fine.

Yeah, I'm just waiting for my trade partner to give you guys the okay.

With the trade for Diggs, the bills actually upgraded 3 starting positions on offense, 1 Wr, 2 Wr, and 3 Wr.

San Francisco is listening to offers on either the 13th and the 31st overall picks.

I wouldn't say we were thin at DE. Linebacker, I would agree with. But at DE, we have 4 players who have proven they can play there in the NFL, along with one developmental prospect. Indeed, we could use some youth at the position. Quinton Jefferson actually played more steps at DE than he did at any other position last year.

I believe that Prince Tea Wanogho is likely to go in the second. He is a high upside tackle that needs some development. I have seen him mocked in the second many times. As for Tight ends, the only one that I would be okay with in the second is Cole Kmet.

I am willing to take multiple teams as well.

Try the search function Or just read the first page of topics.

Bills were a rhetorical #1. Throw in the Browns for #5 then?

I would like the Vikings, Niners, Ravens, or Chargers please

I would think to make this a fairish draft, you would have to do something like 123...30,31,32,32,31,30...2,1,1,2...30,31,32,32,31...

Possibly DT. But maybe not 1T. In the 4-3 our depth chart at one of the DT spots is Ed Oliver, Quinton Jefferson, and Harrison Phillips. I doubt that they would keep a fourth tackle in this specific group, and the value of upgrading on Harisson Phillips wouldn't be worth it comparws to having another player.

Obviously different cases, but I know that going up against my brother in practice elevated my intensity in basketball/soccer. Can't let your brother beat you. With them being positions that face off regularly, it wouldn't be shocking for there to be a similar effect.

That also depends on the big board too though. Some are decent. Josh Edwards of CBS' is pretty bad.

No. He's done.

He has good size, speed, strength, can win 50/50 balls, and is very versatile. His 2 biggest concerns are injury problems, and his route running could use some polishing. He has a high ceiling but a pretty low floor. Boom or Bust prospect

Let's assume the OP is right, and Josh Allen is not a franchise Qb, and Tua will be. We would not have the draft capital to move up and get Tua. We do not even have a first this year. Tua will go in the top 10, likely the top 5. If we were to try to trade Josh Allen, that would send signals to the teams buying that they would be better off just taking Tua themselves. By trying to trade Josh we would be showing our hand that we are going for a new Qb, and that would show that the team that knows Josh best would rather have Tua. It just isn't feasible.

Nobody in the world can run at 23 mph for 30 seconds. 23 mph was likely his peak and he probably just touched it. For refrence, 23 mph would be a 9.73 second 100 meter dash, an Olympic caliber time.

This trade is a separate matter from the Hopkins trade. 2 years ago, Cooks was traded for a first, then went and had a career best in yards. Before this year, he had 4 straight 1000+ yard, 16 game seasons. For a rough equivalent of an early third, this is a reasonable trade. (Late second for Cooks and a fourth)

There's a fundamental difference between baseball and football that is not being taken account for here. In baseball, there is more even talent distribution as a result of the longer season. You need a smaller marginal difference to have a winning season. In football, there's a greater allocation of talent by certain teams due to a shorter season leading to more things that can go wrong. Especially with the difference in the playoffs being a one loss out in football, that contributes to this. This overinflates what a good football team's win percentage would be to a good baseball team's. The best baseball team last year would have a record in-between 10-6 and 11-5 if you went by win percentage.

This trade wasn't that bad. The Hopkins trade was. This trade is more reasonable.

A team that averages 10-6 in football is not equivalent to 102-60 in baseball. In baseball, that would have been the 4th best team last year, and 10-6 is not 4th best in football.