baskingridgebillsfan

I can't have a kicker missing big kicks when games matter. Can't have it.

I think moving forward saint Doug should be his only moniker

I have been supportive if a third year for Rex. I have to say the choice to punt and ten men on the field for the big run and not getting the time out before the field goal have left me feeling go ahead an move on.

they said this today ?

Honestly thought it would be today Why make the guy take questions all week from the ny media. In addition you can watch Lynn prepare although it's a fire drill for him it will still be Interesting to see how he handles it. In addition you can start talking to other candidates . Seems like a no brainer. I guess it wasn't

I think he is a good player who could be great. This is what frustrates us as fans. The team will be worse with out him however. Are you willing to take a step back at the position ? Tough call for me. I have losing assets for nothing in return.

He wasn't the issue in this game

Defense is a mess but the kicker missed two and that is the story of this one

Merry Christmas. You are fired Get him out

1 for 31

I see that point. Does Brandon have Kim's ear ? is he president in name only. I would love to know

I think you have to bite the bullet and pay Taylor. if he hits the market he will get paid , the good ones always do.

in 2016 it may . lol

you say backfield play you get Sully's attention just saying Never said I agreed with it just connecting the dots. Great pettine stat is he had the browns 7-4 at one point go figure

I agree with this. Rex's issue is Rex. He created unrealistic expectations now the check is due . Lets see what happens

playing the scenario out . Lynn is named head coach. I bet he turns to Pettine for d coach. Lynn is been with the Rex crowd for a long time.

is it Whaley or Brandon ? If it is Whaley wear is the president ? Why is he allowing this ?

In my mind it keeps going back to Brandon. I know there are some on this board who will jump up and down and say Brandon has nothing to do with the product on the field. To that I answer as the president of the team everything is a reflection on him. If he has zero to do with the product on the field, a notion that I dismiss, he is the president he has influence , but following the theory that he has zero input to the product on the field. What purpose does he serve. Shouldn't the man running both of your organization have a clear vision , a plan for success , the ability to know when things are not working and when thing are on the right path? Brandon supporters seem to want to have it both ways. The organization is a mess but the president bares no responsibility. Taking a step back you have a five hundred team without consistent qb play. When you have inconsistent qb play you are a 500 team . The issue they may be having probably goes on with a lot a franchises a good old fashion turf war between coach and gm. With this knowledge wouldn't a strong team president put an end to it ? on the subject of turf wars ; they do not have to be the death of a coach. George young and Parcells were always at odds. Joe Torre would run out silly lineups to push Cashman into making moves, Dtika and Buddy Ryan won a super bowl. A strong president would handle these matters. A weak one blames others.

Imo Doug doesn't know for sure what the Peluga's plan is so he had to play Down the middle

According to Tim graham if they are not draft picks they don't count

I am sure the Buffalo news will have an article on how the way the manny situation was handled lead to the teams 3-13 record

Well said

to me the post is a perfect counter balance to the yellow journalism practiced by the Buffalo News. Take a stat , random or otherwise and build your case around it . Is Rex better then Bill ? NO on the other hand I think some of you forget how dominate his defense were on the Jets. Take a look at some of the Bills games. and I have no idea what is the issue with the defense now.

Einstein was a horrible speller . Chomsky believes rules of writing and communication should evolve to the current language of the times. or in other words lighten up

Whaley hasn't been here long enough to have 66 percent of his draft picks on the roster. In addition being on the roster and contributing to success is two different things. Meeks on the roster was a draft so in Tm's world that makes him a asset . Crazy logic the article has nothing to do with critical thinking. His premise can't stand up to simple question like of the draft picks how many play, or how weak was the roster when he started drafting. The whole premise is flawed when Whaley hasn't been gm long enough to have 66 percent of the roster.