DaBillsFanSince1973

just my observation but if it wasn't worth your time, why this post? which I may add is quite petty.

trust the process/

you look at the dark side, I try to look at the bright side. some like to wallow in negativity, I try to avoid it. you want to call it realism. I'm going to call it reality wont become reality until the end result. this staff has their chance to succeed and if you and any other want to see failure before the it's said and done, go wallow in it then.

you and the OP go hand in hand. instead of looking at the bright side and thinking they may hit on some of the picks why not just go ahead and say a stupid comment like "it won't matter if we don't hit on them and/or trade most of them away to move up for a QB or player like we did with Watkins and that guy don't pan out." that's always the spirit. spirit, did I say spirit? does that coincide with savior? savior, spirit. perfect synonyms to go along with the negative poster known as savior the scout peterman. smfh

he has not been a big factor this season and why I feel they wont miss him. now, you want to go back to 2014 (10 sacks/35 tackles) form or even 2013 (7.5 sacks/46 tackles), sure then they would miss him. but 4 tackles and one sack in 2017. no, he wont be missed. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DareMa00.htm I know, it's hard to let go but in the long run this will likely be a very good decision since he wasn't a major contributor and did not fit in to their plans going forward . again, I trust the process.

you can see in to the future? how do you know they would of been better with him than without him? just speculation on your part so I will throw my speculation out there and say they wont be any worse. I trust the process.

what I like about a majority of your prediction posts so far this season, is you're wrong...

6-2. some wont like it, because well, it doesn't fit the tank agenda.

looks like something a redneck would do.

exactly my point to the savior.

another fail post by the great scout saviorpeterman. who are these "as most expect" this is just two sites who must not fit your most expect group. https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks http://www.espn.com/nfl/picks I'll throw in yardbarker for the hell of it. The Raiders may have saved their season with a thrilling win over Kansas City, one that cannot even be termed "last-second," because the winning play happened on an untimed down. With Denver suddenly looking vulnerable and most of the rest of the AFC unspectacular if not outright flawed, 3-4 is not a death sentence for playoff hopes. That said, if Buffalo can continue its run of successfully playing takeaway on defense, the Bills can kill two birds with one stone –strengthen their playoff hopes, while denting Oakland's wild-card chances. Tyrod Taylor has been steady, and while Buffalo's turnover margin may not be sustainable, it's getting harder to bet against a team whose confidence seems to be building steadily week after week. Pick: Bills http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/nfl_week_8_predictions/s1__24863093

so you're saying they're going to turn it around. maybe?

that's my perspective, could go either way.

don't see the kelly comparison here? so far, they're doing it their way and sitting at 4-2. the remnants from the past regime that have been removed so far have not hurt them in the w/l column. april is a long way off and 10 games to go. this season so far has been sort of a locker room cleaning yet still contending. any judgement likely wouldn't be sound until like the 2019 season where they should have their roster pretty much set?

trolls do research?

ahh yes, the dreaded "17 years" guise. you know, it doesn't phase me anymore really. hell, it may of been at the 15 year mark where I just didn't give a real **** anymore. it''ll break when it's broke, maybe this season? you never know

they had to get something, they were not going to cut him. they had to unload him somewhere and seems the jags were willing to take on the risk financially ask well as the risk he may not live up to expectations and offered a 6th round pick for him. beane has been stock piling those picks, maybe he can find a gem or two this next draft? you had a kid who's potential was off the charts but has been in decline and with the past off field issues, he was already a big scratch with the new regime. he was a goner from the get go they just couldn't find a team that wanted him. he was a whaley player and they have been almost methodically removing said remnants and will build their team with only players that buy in to the process. which, frankly, I'm beginning to buy in to as well. this trade comes as no shock and I understand they're doing what they feel is best for the team going forward.

those that despised him and his money, he's gone, who cares what they got. to answer your question in terms of the trade, hell no from a talent perspective. you could obviously see he wasn't buying in and they got what they could based not on his talent, but unfortunate reputation. the kid was a beast when on all cylinders. later big stuff

you say this with such certainty. just a guise opinion

is 11 the magic number? what if they win 10 and make the post season?

you really dig these type of topics/threads don't you. kind of makes you feel right at (PPP) home.

I agree with this 100%

this thread seems to be going well. seems we now live in a "you hurt my little feelings" society. softies when it comes to the kneeling, softies when it comes to an owner calling players inmates. as for them walking out, go for it. let the drama continue.

you're the type that stands in front of the mirror smiling at yourself for like hours. you're so full of yourself man that it's comical really... as far as the scouting world you claim to have worked in, you know that little make believe universe you come from, I've got some ocean front property in arizona for sale if you're interested. 10 Types of Internet Trolls You'll Meet Online https://www.lifewire.com/types-of-internet-trolls-3485894 05 of 10 The show-off, know-it-all or blabbermouth troll (SaviorPeterman) A close relative to the persistent debate troll, the show-off or blabbermouth troll is a person who doesn't necessarily like to participate in arguments but does love to share his opinion in extreme detail, even spreading rumors and secrets in some cases. Think of that one family member or friend you know who just loves to hear his own voice. That's the Internet equivalent of the show-off or know-it-all or blabbermouth troll. They love to have long discussions and write lots of paragraphs about whatever they know, whether anyone reads it or not.