Jump to content

DaBillsFanSince1973

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,704
  • Joined

Everything posted by DaBillsFanSince1973

  1. what I like about a majority of your prediction posts so far this season, is you're wrong...
  2. 6-2. some wont like it, because well, it doesn't fit the tank agenda.
  3. looks like something a redneck would do.
  4. exactly my point to the savior.
  5. another fail post by the great scout saviorpeterman. who are these "as most expect" this is just two sites who must not fit your most expect group. https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks http://www.espn.com/nfl/picks I'll throw in yardbarker for the hell of it. The Raiders may have saved their season with a thrilling win over Kansas City, one that cannot even be termed "last-second," because the winning play happened on an untimed down. With Denver suddenly looking vulnerable and most of the rest of the AFC unspectacular if not outright flawed, 3-4 is not a death sentence for playoff hopes. That said, if Buffalo can continue its run of successfully playing takeaway on defense, the Bills can kill two birds with one stone –strengthen their playoff hopes, while denting Oakland's wild-card chances. Tyrod Taylor has been steady, and while Buffalo's turnover margin may not be sustainable, it's getting harder to bet against a team whose confidence seems to be building steadily week after week. Pick: Bills http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/nfl_week_8_predictions/s1__24863093
  6. so you're saying they're going to turn it around. maybe?
  7. that's my perspective, could go either way.
  8. don't see the kelly comparison here? so far, they're doing it their way and sitting at 4-2. the remnants from the past regime that have been removed so far have not hurt them in the w/l column. april is a long way off and 10 games to go. this season so far has been sort of a locker room cleaning yet still contending. any judgement likely wouldn't be sound until like the 2019 season where they should have their roster pretty much set?
  9. ahh yes, the dreaded "17 years" guise. you know, it doesn't phase me anymore really. hell, it may of been at the 15 year mark where I just didn't give a real **** anymore. it''ll break when it's broke, maybe this season? you never know
  10. they had to get something, they were not going to cut him. they had to unload him somewhere and seems the jags were willing to take on the risk financially ask well as the risk he may not live up to expectations and offered a 6th round pick for him. beane has been stock piling those picks, maybe he can find a gem or two this next draft? you had a kid who's potential was off the charts but has been in decline and with the past off field issues, he was already a big scratch with the new regime. he was a goner from the get go they just couldn't find a team that wanted him. he was a whaley player and they have been almost methodically removing said remnants and will build their team with only players that buy in to the process. which, frankly, I'm beginning to buy in to as well. this trade comes as no shock and I understand they're doing what they feel is best for the team going forward.
  11. those that despised him and his money, he's gone, who cares what they got. to answer your question in terms of the trade, hell no from a talent perspective. you could obviously see he wasn't buying in and they got what they could based not on his talent, but unfortunate reputation. the kid was a beast when on all cylinders. later big stuff
  12. you say this with such certainty. just a guise opinion
  13. is 11 the magic number? what if they win 10 and make the post season?
  14. you really dig these type of topics/threads don't you. kind of makes you feel right at (PPP) home.
  15. this thread seems to be going well. seems we now live in a "you hurt my little feelings" society. softies when it comes to the kneeling, softies when it comes to an owner calling players inmates. as for them walking out, go for it. let the drama continue.
  16. you're the type that stands in front of the mirror smiling at yourself for like hours. you're so full of yourself man that it's comical really... as far as the scouting world you claim to have worked in, you know that little make believe universe you come from, I've got some ocean front property in arizona for sale if you're interested. 10 Types of Internet Trolls You'll Meet Online https://www.lifewire.com/types-of-internet-trolls-3485894 05 of 10 The show-off, know-it-all or blabbermouth troll (SaviorPeterman) A close relative to the persistent debate troll, the show-off or blabbermouth troll is a person who doesn't necessarily like to participate in arguments but does love to share his opinion in extreme detail, even spreading rumors and secrets in some cases. Think of that one family member or friend you know who just loves to hear his own voice. That's the Internet equivalent of the show-off or know-it-all or blabbermouth troll. They love to have long discussions and write lots of paragraphs about whatever they know, whether anyone reads it or not.
  17. in your pea brain I'm sure it is.
  18. are your eyes brown? nevertheless, you're full of ****!
  19. oh baumy, I was just yanking his chains. lighten up francis.
  20. no, you don't have to. you have your space up above in the pinned section. meanwhile, down below needs to be available for the saviorpeterman trolling threads and whatever other clutter pops up, lol just pulling your chains master patriarch.
×
×
  • Create New...