Dr.Sack

Belichick is busy finding a new cheating strategy.

Bradford sucks. Tyrod or bust.

Ask OJ about mood swings. Even the Concussion Dr says he would bet it all that he has CTE.

We already had a terrorist. His name was Abraham Lincoln. He did start the War of Norrhern Aggression.

A 5+ 40 guy that can cover? Well I'll be damned.

Hoyer sucks and in his prime Cassel was a pro bowler. Now Hoyer is going to be 31 this year and has never been a pro bowler or remotely close. Hoyer is a garbage QB. Manuel is a cheap backup who is 26 and had been in the offense for a year. Would I like to see us draft a backup? Of course. Hoyer is a conservative call that does little for us long term.

When former players start calling Rex a racist, as they did with Chip Kelly I'll get nervous. As of today Rex is a .482 winning % coach who is trying desperately to keep his HC job. Endorsing Trump isn't the worse thing in the world, both want to build a bully. Very similar those two are. One could write a book on their similarities; born into business, obnoxious, bullies, loud, good at getting media attention, one has a foot fetish, the other an immigrant wife fetish. It's amazing.

No. This is bad logic. Hoyer is basically Cassel 2.0 which doesn't mean he's a better option than EJ. I'll take EJ over Hoyer. Hoyer's weak arm won't cut it in Buffalo. Deandre Hopkins on Hoyer "get that mother f$$$$$ out of the game." I think Sammy & Hopkins are boys from Clemson. No way Sammy would want that garbage in Blo.

Bottom line is Wall Street aka (the NFL) asked for a bailout (public financing of stadiums) for their billionaire owners all while operating as a 501c3 non-profit corporation.

Ranked: 1) Nikki Haley 2) Kelly Ayotte 3) Susan Collins 4) Mary Fallin Haley would drive Clinton crazy. Scrappy debater & at 43 has already been Governor for 6 years.

The nice thing about the Internet is all you need is one person to hit copy paste send & everything is revealed.

Agreed. You of all people should know how corrupt the Dems are. Why do you think Bernie would be treated fairly by the Clinton - Wasserman-Schlutz machine. Google the Clinton hit list, no I'm not talking about the mysterious deaths and suicides. I'm talking about their hit list from the 2008 primary. Bernie likely will get a primary challenger in Vermont. Hey he may even end up killed off. They'll say it was old age.

Bake some brownies $1.99 at the local grocer.

As Bob Marley said, "alcohol is the destruction of a nation. Weed is its salvation." Let a man grow weed in his backyard and he will be a slave to nothing.

The Democrats the past 20 years have been trying to outflank the Republicans. It was Robert Rubin who devised the deregulation of Wall Street via the Glass-Steagall repeal. It was Clinton who passed the 1994 crime bill that expanded mass incaration and further decimated another generation of minorities disproportionately. Clinton even doubled down on this the other day when interrupted by a BLM protestor. Clinton also passed NAFTA and a balanced budget. Clinton's welfare reform created Welfare to work and massively expanded the large retailers lobby for millions of low wage workers. So in many ways Clinton while a Democrat was really a neoliberal. The Democrats continued their march to the right as they vastly supported the war in Iraq, more free trade deals, the Wall Street bailout, then Obama's expanded drone program, and regime change in Libya & Syria creating more instability in the Middle East. When you thought the Dems were coming back under Obama they passed the Heritage Foundation's newly adopted Romneycare known as the ACA. The Democrats have been stealing Republican ideas the past 20 years. My problem is the Dems have moved so far right, the Republicans can only push back on issues that don't win. So that's why I support fringe candidates like Trump, Cruz & Sanders. Look it sounds crazy but you won't get needed change with Kasich & Hillary, they are the same pro-corporate crony capitalism, bought government that will continue to destroy our country.

Peyton Manning is still the best of this generation. The guys are 1 year apart and Manning was playing in his 4 season before anyone heard of Brady. Manning even has the head to head AFC Championship game record winning 3 to 1, and managed to win 2 Super Bowls past age 30. Brady is 1-2. Brady did go 3-0 age 24-27 winning by a FG each time with a defense dominated team and SpyGate playing some role. To me Manning's 17 seasons (2011 injury) as a starter, numbers are better than Brady's 14 seasons (2007 injury). Brady probably does play 3 more season. If he manages to stay healthy, his stats will eclipse Manning's and playing to age 41 will be a feat in and of ifself.

I see Trump as the great unifier. He is no fool as portrayed by the lame stream media. Assuming Sanders is defeated and Trump somehow makes it out of the convention I see Trump going populist to defeat Hillary. Trump's wall is the infrastructure project that Bernie people are attracted to. The compromise will be $15 minimum wage in exchange for the deportation of 12,000,000 illegals. There will be many more low wage jobs available. Cutting our military bases and rebuilding our nuclear arms would still serve as the same deterrent to foreign aggression. Trump is no fool he will take elements of the Tea Party and Sanders movement to create the people's coalition. Free public college is attainable with $80 billion per year. Millennials will jump at this. We spend $600 billion on defense, so some of the defense savings will pay for it. Additionally Sanders tax idea on Wall Street speculation fully finances it. Repealing Obamacare and replacing it with universal healthcare, something Trump has supported, could be the ticket he punches to the White House. Paid for by saving nearly $5 trillion we spend nationally over the next 10 years. Cutting taxes to 0% for manufacturers brings Apple and all the south of the border jobs back we lost with NAFTA. To win over women I see Trump running the ever beautiful Michelle Bachman as his VP, imagine that ticket. Trump does this and wins 60-65% of the vote.

You must be doing quite well and are content with the current system. I was attracted to Cruz but even I must admit that blowing up the Fed, blowing up the IRS, and replacing it with a flat tax seems a bit naive and I'm just not that cavalier. I do believe in some form of regulation over the financial sector and that's why I've gravitated towards Sanders who sounds more like Eisenhower imo. Trump is a skillful negotiator, and has built many successful companies. He's also a master of media manipulation and has played the lame stream media for over $2 billion in free advertising. Yet is it all a charade? Does a member of the plutocracy really want to bring the hammer down on a governmental system that has been so beneficial to him and his family? So then I go back to Cruz. I like him, and love his religious belief. He is a man of principal and clearly is the most religious of the three. My question though is with all the talk and rhetoric what evidence do I have in that he will get a anything done that will benefit me? Here is a guy who's own wife was a Goldman Sachs executive. And Goldman Sachs is nicknamed Government Sachs for a reason. With the ties to The US Treasury & the Federal Reserve how much of an outsider is Cruz, really? So I'm back looking at Sanders. I hate his foreign policy. Here is a guy who is short on base closures. Trump has supported closing them, I like that. Sanders is also weak on the border, Trump promises to build a wall that Mexico will pay for. Trumps financing is a bit sketchy but makes sense a tax on Mexican imports used to pay for it. Where I agree with Sanders is on 4 key issues; opposition to foreign wars of regime change, breaking up too big to fail banks via Dodd-Frank & US Treasury regulatory capabilities, Healthcare we do outspend every other major country on earth per capita and don't guarantee to everyone, I've been a victim of a few plant closures the past 20 years and know what it's like to have no healthcare. Last college, as someone who has gone back to school in his 50s and taken on loans to finance I find it a bit odd that you need school to survive so why is it not payed for by the very businesses who will benefit from my training to do the jobs of the 21st century? I've voted Republican in every election since Reagan in 1980. I'm born in 1960 (Go Bills) so I've been a life-long independent who always voted Republican with the exception of Ross Perot in 1992. Didn't make that mistake in 1996. I think the Republican Party has lost there way and running guys like Romney, and Bush W have hurt our credibility with younger voters. Mark my words the establishment hates both Cruz & Trump and that's why I like them. But Cruz is too unproven and Trump is moving to the center and really has changed his position too many times for me to trust him. Sanders is an old FDR Democrat, who aligns with the Southern Democrats pre-Nixon's southern strategy. I mean Sanders didn't even try to win the south. He is winning because of the white vote. He gets no support from the base of the Democratic Party and is somehow toe to toe vs the Clinton machine. I love it! Sanders might look like the grandfather who didn't get his pudding but he's a damn man of his word. He's been saying the same crap for the past 50 years. So I say screw it, let's get behind someone who can beat Clinton and possibly not start WWIII.

Yes. If I could cherry pick I want Trump's negotiating skills, Sanders truthfulness, & Cruz's blow up the Fed, outside the beltway populism. Washington & corporate America are broken a revolution is coming. Too many people are falling behind. Occupy, The Tea Party, and the rise of Cruz, Trump & Sanders are all answers to our government's paralysis to get anything done that's helps average Americans.

Trump, Sanders & Cruz are talking about big ideas. Kasich & Clinton are boring moderates.

Businesses have already been crushed. Trump talked a good game but as he widened his lead and became the inevitable nominee he went soft on free trade deals. His tone changed like Hillary after her mid-March victories. I honestly think Trump could be a better President than Sanders if he want back to his strong opposition to free trade agreements. Also his tax plan is very centrist. I like Cruz's plan more. Sanders while wrong on many issues was right IMO on; Iraq, Wall Street Bail Out, Panama Free Trade, NAFTA, minimum wage increase, and protecting 2nd amendment - gun manufacturers immunity. These reasons alone show Sanders can outflank Trump on populism. That's why Trump must go back to being anti-free trade.

I was a Trump supporter until he went back on repealing NAFTA, CAFTA & the other free trade disasters. His comment I'll make them better through re-negotiating is not good enough for me. Sanders puts it bluntly. I think Sanders will do more to help workers.

I'm a life long independent who leans toward a traditional Eisenhower Republicanism. Eisenhower made expanding unions one of the central tenants of his platform. Eisenhower was pro new deal even going as far to say any party who tries to get rid of social security will be voted out of office. And then there's the often quoted anti-military industrial complex quote. Bernie sounds like he is Eisenhower.

Scott Chandler scares me.