49 year old Columbia, Harvard & Oxford educated.
Lots of interesting case decisions my favorite being his opinion for the 2015 case of "Energy and Environmental Legal Institute v. Joshua Epel".
A few contradictions: for the death penalty, but against assisted suicide. Also never understood the strict interpretation of the constitution, as social issues on the 1790s are different. As far as a central bank and specific industries they did not exist at the time our founding father wrote it.
A few pros: he is for states rights over federal power, which will do me well in many states with legalized cannabis.
Overall he is not going to be someone who shakes things up and overturns Roe v Wade which is the fundamental line in the sand for most liberals. His appointment should be swift and I expect the only push back will be from the corporatist Democrats like Boxer, & Booker.
When comparing and contrasting Garland vs Gorsuch there is not much of a difference.