That's No Moon

This is the problem with the loyalty argument. That's the situation where the player deserves the school's loyalty in return and a lot of times they don't get it. If a kid who has been loyal goes out and suffers a debilitating injury in service of the school they deserve the ability to finish their education under the agreement they signed with the school. That's a reasonable and humane expectation. That is not what happens in many cases and that's wrong. The one open transfer is fine, but I also think that any time there is a coaching change the kids deserve the right to leave without penalty just like they can rescind their NLI in certain circumstances. If the university fires the coach that recruited them why should the kid have to stay? There's nothing saying that the schemes will stay the same or that that kid will have a spot with the new regime. If the coach just leaves on his own why should the kid be stuck? None of that is in their control. As much as I personally dislike Deion Sanders I respect the way he handled the existing players at Colorado. He came in, did Spring Practice and told the ones he didn't want that he didn't want them and he encouraged them to transfer. Yes that's self serving on his part to get scholarships back for his own use, but it's also being fair to the players. Hey, you're not going to play if you stay so if you want to actually play college football use the rules, find another school where you WILL play and go play there. With the old rules all of those players would have been stuck in a crappy situation where they weren't wanted, drop a level of competition, or sit out a year because of something that wasn't their doing. We can't go back to that.

And these are a lot of the players who are helped by the open transfer rules. They can go somewhere else where they will play and it frees up a scholarship for the team they left which helps them too. Nobody is complaining about these people leaving their programs, but they can't write rules only for good players.

That's a simple solution that doesn't need rules. Write better NIL deals with clawback language. The current lack of that language isn't on the kids, it's on the adults who are rushing to hand them money and write poor contracts. I've seen some NIL deal language myself and it's really naive. A. unless they get hurt then all bets are off. B. head count sports aren't the only sports that this impacts.

Except the schools aren't loyal to the players. Coaches get fired, kids are stuck, kids lose scholarships all the time to other kids that those same schools bring in to replace them, transfers or not. If schools want to make the loyalty argument then make scholarships guaranteed for 4 years and make them irrevocable unless the player is booted from the school for grades or discipline. THAT is loyalty to the player. They will never ever do that.

The problem will be that the players have already had a taste of the freedom. Imposing new rules restricting that at this point will come along with a raft of litigation. Frankly, if your friends wanted to sort it out, they could stop accepting transfers. They won't, none of them will. They'll all whine about it, but they'll all keep poaching from each other.

Incredibly unethical but Pandora's box has been opened. Transfer rules aren't going to roll back, for every case like this where one school gets played there are scores of situations where other schools are benefitting from the additional movement of talent. Despite what they say out loud, schools love the new transfer rules. The NIL thing is a little bit different and you might start seeing some parameters around NIL deals themselves with clawback clauses. It's not officially the schools doing it, it's the outside entities. They will start inserting language into contracts if they feel burned too many times.

There is WAY too much TV money in football to drop football, especially for a strong basketball school like UConn in a solid media market. ACC would take them in a heartbeat when they start to implode when FSU and Clemson force their ways out.

Yep it's very shortsighted. If the kids don't learn to love it, they won't watch when they are older either, but that's modern corporate thinking too. The only quarter that matters is the next quarter.

When I was 11 I worked my butt off all year to be able to buy my own season ticket in the 45 yard line. Hustling around the neighborhood, cutting grass, shoveling snow, you name it. Working, not gifted. No kid will ever be able to tell a story like that again which is a shame. There is no 11 year old who could ever afford a 15k PSL plus 6k in tickets for the seat that I had. Not legally anyway.

You want the children to show up 2 nights in a row? They're just so very tired. 1 shot in the 2nd period so far. 1. Getting outshot 24-8 in the game. Bodes well.

don't give them ideas.

Expect to be told 10k a seat for the PSL in a corresponding section with tickets then being a couple Gs on top of that. I'm not joking.

And if a team were ever to do it, it would be this one.

Which parking? Helicopter or palanquin? They dont want to show you the downgrade option because they know people will take it. If it's not an option they can sell the top tier and makes claims like they have "a 70% hit rate" to make you feel like a schmuck for not signing on to the top tier like the rest of your current peer group.

It's the cost yes, but its moreso the slimy way they are going about their business thus far. I saw what the Eagles did when they built their new stadium and a big segment of their fanbase was permanently priced out of the building. The Eagles don't care, they make their money, but the stadium atmosphere has never been the same since. The Bills currently have one of the great atmospheres in sports and they are in the process of destroying it. Probably permanently.

Pegula's yacht is going to have a pay toilet.

The numbers are astronomical otherwise there's no reason to hide them behind a closed access sales pitch. Lock in as many Chet and Muffys as possible, then let the unwashed masses know that they've lost the seats they've had for 50 years to people paying $20k a seat so they feel fortunate to "only" have a PSL fee of 5k per seat to sit in the worst seats in the building.

Yep, for the short time he was here.

Takeo Spikes

With Terry's record with people in similar positions? Don't buy, rent. Monthly if possible.

PSLs are obnoxious and I hope the people who want to buy tickets have the cojones to tell them to stick their PSLs right up their rectums. What's the risk? You lose your seniority? They're already ignoring that so what good is it? As for reasonable what is reasonable? When I lived there and had tickets I had 4 on the 45 yard line. How much is "reasonable" to ask a school teacher to pay for the right to continue to buy comparable seats? One year of college for my kids? 2? The games are all on TV. They can enjoy the new building and I don't think the market for PSLs is close to what they think it is. Frankly I hope it's half empty the first year.

We will see how well they know their customers when it comes time to put pen to paper.

Do they provide lube or should you bring your own?

Post pricing sheet and sales pitch video