That's No Moon

4 million in dead cap next year if we cut him. 400k in 2020. He might stick around next year, particularly if the cap is flat.

Bojorquez didn't rotate the ball on the PAT miss and his punting was terrible today.

His dead cap is even more if they cut him for some reason. He has been cap cheap. That ends next year and he will probably have at least 2 years of being cap expensive. It's all relative. In 2027, Pat Mahomes cap hit will be 59.9M. If Allen keep playing like he is people in Buffalo will lose their minds when they see his second contract.

His cap hit is 40.9M next year.

Meaning he could have had a heart attack or a stroke while flying and then crashed.

His cap hit is 12th among QBs and it's only higher than 5 QBs past their rookie contract not signed to be backups. You could argue that he's better than at least 4 of them. Carr - 21.5M Alex Smith - 21.4M Jacoby Brissett - 21.375M Kirk Cousins - 20M Matt Ryan - 18.96M Carson Wentz - 18.66M Teddy Bridgewater - 14M My point isn't that Carr is good. My point is that this is the range that even moderately effective QBs get paid on their second deal. Any QB has a smaller cap hit than, on their second or further contract, is a backup or was signed to be a backup (Mariota 9.1M, Fitzpatrick 8M, Taylor 7.5M, Foles 6.6M, etc.) Before you scream, I realize there are QBs who have signed extensions that have lower cap hits right now, Mahomes and Watson come to mind, but the extensions haven't kicked in yet so technically this is still the rookie deal. Both of their cap hits go up astronomically next year when the extensions begin. By the time Carr's deal ends in a couple years his cap hit will be 19.9M and it won't look out of line for an average NFL starter. It's not really that out of line now given the dynamics.

He can go polish his Arena Bowl trophy...

Were you injured in an accident?

Ding!

That's correct. What song?

I'll give you the continuation. And hypotheses can't define how I be droppin' these Mockeries, lyrically perform armed robbery

Maybe. But it ain't him.

The same thing that pro scouts miss on players all the time. It's really hard to measure and quantify internal desire to improve and persist through failure. If you could make an accurate test for that you'd be a billionaire. Tom Brady wouldn't have been a 6th round pick and Russ Wilson wouldn't have been a third and Ryan Leaf wouldn't have been #2 overall. This isn't just in sports either, there are plenty of people with good grades and high measurables who are terrible employees and plenty of people with less than great measurables who are much better and ultimately more successful.

That's a lot of Chicago but it was a valiant effort

Uhm. No.

I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses

Agreed. I don't care for the blue pants.

Bills were -2.5

We had a flock of turkeys congregate in front of my kids' elementary school every day for a couple years. They mysteriously disappeared. I still see different turkeys all the time, deer, squirrels, opossum, foxes galore, bald eagles if you go to the dam nearby, the occasional pheasant. I'm pretty sure I could call a turkey to my backyard at this point and you could clip him and a pair of trophy bucks who come there every day too. Suburban Philly, apparent sportsman's paradise.

They don't have turkeys in Minnesota? Fire Klentak, fire McPhail, Brett Brown already got fired, I'm sure if Elton Brand got fired everyone would be fine with that.

Yes, I also remember when we got Marv Albert and Paul McGuire every week.

They also gave themselves an out after this season where he only counts 1M against the cap for 1 year if the release him. It will be interesting to see how this evolves during the season.

You just need to shift your mindset and accept that 30 points is now the weekly target and some weeks it's going to take more than that. Just look at how many points are scored in every game every week. Gone are the days of the 35 point over unders. Even bad teams are getting into the mid 40s and 50s regularly and 60+ happens frequently. You just can't count on any defense to hold people under 20 on a regular basis. Under 20 is a great defensive gam or an inept offensive one. Much less than 20 is a total anomaly. It used to be that 20+ was enough to win most games. It just isn't anymore. Teams that win score and do just enough to slow the other guy down or make them turn the ball over a couple times. So far this year, out of 47 games played, only six teams have won games scoring less than 24 points. Only 3 have won scoring 20 or less. There have only been 3 teams held to single digits so far.

This isn't so much of an apology as it is an indictment of the Jets. He didn't wrote this for you, he wrote this for angry Jet fans. All of the plaudits he gave the organization from Beane to McDermott could easily be read as see what the Jets could have done but didn't. The Bills hired the right people who got Allen help while the Jets hired the wrong people who didn't get Darnold help. Not that it matters, but this is more Mehta trolling the Jets.

The way we haven't covered the middle of the field the last two weeks Waller should terrify you.