-
Posts
7,376 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by That's No Moon
-
Moss expected to be a healthy scratch today
That's No Moon replied to Alphadawg7's topic in The Stadium Wall
<Insert rb here> in space has been the meta since about 2010. Waiting. For it. -
11/21/21 Colts@Bills Second Half Thread
That's No Moon replied to Hapless Bills Fan's topic in The Stadium Wall
Looking forward to this week's excuses and denial. -
Nor do I find sporting events to be the appropriate venue for the anthem.
-
This. Take the Colts lightly at your peril. That's a good month's work.
-
Anybody Have Oddball Food and/or Condiment Pairings?
That's No Moon replied to Irv's topic in Off the Wall
It's basically sweet and sour sauce in salad dressing form so I don't see that as that strange. -
George Jetson's Parents Are Making Whoopie This Month
That's No Moon replied to Gugny's topic in Off the Wall
I'm here for it. -
Just my observation. He seems to have shortened up.
-
That, and Bass seems to not be overswinging this year trying to kick every ball into the sun.
-
Bruce and the boys roughed their share of QBs under the new rules too.
-
Jon Gruden suing the NFL, Roger Goodell
That's No Moon replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall
There is no such thing as a forced resignation. You are given the choice, resign or be fired. You can choose to make them fire you. The Raiders did not fire Gruden for cause, they didn't void his contract. It's highly probable that he's being paid his full salary as a part of his agreement to resign. Being fired for cause is totally different and he wasn't. To your other point you still do not have to prove that his actions caused harm to others. He's not a protected class, nothing he lost his job over was protected speech. You don't have the freedom to say whatever you want over emails or over the greater internet or even out loud with impunity. Grudens emails, at least in part, were disparaging to the commissioner of the organization for whom he worked. The Raiders are under no obligation to tolerate that. Just as any of us would expect to lose our jobs if we referred to the CEO of our company that way over company email. Freedom from prosecution from the government is different from freedom from losing your job at a private business. If you really want to go down that road, which again would only be relevant if he were fired for cause which he was not, the Raiders could argue that his actions were harmful to the brand and would significantly impact their future ability to attract players and staff as well as negatively impact sales. It's not really that challenging. One sponsorship is pulled, case is made. Had Gruden stayed on at least one sponsorship would have been pulled. That's lost revenue and is by definition damaging. To my understanding, that's not even Grudens argument. His argument seems to be that he was singled out from a much larger group of people for discipline for similar actions, not that his own actions were justifiable or defensible, but that others should also have been punished but were not. The NFL made that case possible when they declined to release all the emails and nobody else lost their jobs. -
Jon Gruden suing the NFL, Roger Goodell
That's No Moon replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall
No. You don't. Just like the person who flipped off the Presidential motorcade and lost their job. People love to throw around the First Amendment and apply it to situations it does not apply to. If Gruden were to win this it would because of the manner in which the emails were disclosed. FWIW it's not a small difference that he chose to resign rather than be fired. It's sematic but semantics matter. -
Jon Gruden suing the NFL, Roger Goodell
That's No Moon replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall
Nope. Not how that works at all but thanks for playing. -
Because it's one of those partnerships where one party shows up with a cease and desist in hand and says "You want to partner with us right?"
-
Wynonna's Judd's Big Brown Beaver Tails Vanilla Ice Cream Smashing Pumpkins Pie UB 40oz Snow Cone Wu-Tang Clams (cuz tha Wu-Tang Clam ain't nuttin' ta shuck wit) Green Jello (the original name BTW) Jelly Belly Blondies Ting Ting Ring Dings Ram Jam Sandwich
-
The Bills have the best offensive personnel in the NFL
That's No Moon replied to FireChans's topic in The Stadium Wall
Also known as the lies we tell ourselves. I'd take Dallas' offense lock stock and barrel tomorrow. -
Unpopular take...WE are the paper tigers
That's No Moon replied to Hebert19's topic in The Stadium Wall
I'm just asking which good offense they actually stopped to demonstrate the vast defensive improvement you are touting. -
Unpopular take...WE are the paper tigers
That's No Moon replied to Hebert19's topic in The Stadium Wall
And after this game they have 3 losses, against the real teams in front of us. Since you want to use rankings, here are the current points per game rankings of all the offenses we've played. They've played 1 well functioning offense so far and the defense got stomped in that game. Every other game the team we were playing had some level of dysfunction. I don't think you can argue that KC has been functioning up to KC standards this year and the other teams are pretty obvious. Houston - 32nd Jacksonville - 30th Miami x2 - 28th Pittsburgh - 26th Washington - 24th Kansas City - 15th Tennessee - 6th -
Unpopular take...WE are the paper tigers
That's No Moon replied to Hebert19's topic in The Stadium Wall
Looked pretty much the same to me against Tennessee. If you could direct me to the functioning offense that they shut down this year I'd like to know. The Chiefs aren't the problem. -
Unpopular take...WE are the paper tigers
That's No Moon replied to Hebert19's topic in The Stadium Wall
Where are they vastly improved? -
Our main problem may be unfixable this year
That's No Moon replied to oldmanfan's topic in The Stadium Wall
I refuse to call it that. It's idiot mode. There's nothing heroic about it, it's just repetitive stupidity. -
Unpopular take...WE are the paper tigers
That's No Moon replied to Hebert19's topic in The Stadium Wall
Did they get Derrick Henry's cleat marks off their faces yet? How about last year's? This entire team is vastly overrated.
