Jump to content

That's No Moon

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,958
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by That's No Moon

  1. Did they get Derrick Henry's cleat marks off their faces yet? How about last year's? This entire team is vastly overrated.
  2. Last week's first half was the time for this comment. They took that start against a pathetic team and turned it into today's debacle when it SHOULD have been the wake-up call. Today's game should have been the response to whatever their issue was last week but it wasn't. Next week's game SHOULD be the response to this embarrassment and if you are correct the Bills SHOULD win that game by 40 points. I don't think that will happen and I wouldn't be shocked if the Jets won the game outright.
  3. Except it's not. This has been brewing for weeks. Even when they were scoring a lot Allen was under pressure a lot, they couldn't run the ball, and they were terrible in the red zone. Those problems haven't improved, they've only gotten worse. This week was the trade deadline and they doubled down on what they had in house. They were rewarded with this giant pile of garbage. Offensive line was terrible. Allen played like a rookie. WRs dropped passes for first downs. RBs essentially invisible. TE hugely ineffective but remained on the field as a receiver. Daboll did nothing from the offense that we haven't seen a million times. What the offense had done very well for a time last year was countering it's own tendencies and setting teams up to be exploited later in the game with complimentary play calling. This year it's disjointed and ugly and a lot of the time it looks like they have no answers at all. Last year there seemed to be something different every week, a different wrinkle, a new formation, something. This year it looks very stagnant and stale, like they are out of ideas. Whoever is calling the plays whether it's Daboll or Dorsey better get themselves straight or this is going to get sideways on them in a hurry because the schedule gets a lot harder really soon. This was supposed to be the easy part. Today was a must-win game simply because of the opponent and they blew it. Big time. Now instead of talking about getting back into the home field advantage conversation we are looking back at the Patriots closing up behind us.
  4. They are sitting on all that which is why Beasley has 8 catches for 33 yards. Put an inline tight end and a FB on the field and act like you are having protection problems rather than continually spreading the field.
  5. They dont give him the ball anyway. What difference does it make?
  6. I said weeks ago that the offense was broken but nobody wanted to listen. The offense is broken.
  7. Yes, and I agree with the defensive philosophy. We haven't shown that we can hold up on the line v. Cover 0 in order to make teams pay with the deep ball.
  8. Defensive Backs coach.
  9. I don't trust them at all. Not at all.
  10. The righteous indignation is a big turnoff. The teachers in the building you volunteer in can't have an Only Fans as a side hustle (along with a host of other things for that matter) because of moral turpitude language in their contracts, why should you? Because you are free? Piss off.
  11. So, is this how they are fitting him under the cap? I didnt know salary retention was a thing in the NFL.
  12. This place is embarrassing sometimes.
  13. Penn State might be the most overrated team in history this year.
  14. That's a dangerous game to play because if there are things in there which could be evidence in a lawsuit they'd have to give them up in discovery. That people even know they exist at this point makes it likely someone will try to find a way to sue to see them, or at least portions of them. They'd be wise to destroy every single one now that they are done with them and before anything comes down the path that would prevent them from destroying them later on.
  15. Put it this way, if the STL thing ends up working out for STL because the NFL can be shown to have acted in bad faith you can bet there will at least be a court case following any future relocation. Whether or not league people can be smart enough to say things over the phone where they disappear into the ephemera rather than document them over email for future discovery remains to be seen. <Glances at the 650,000 emails the league doesn't want to release about WFT>
  16. Heard yesterday that Watson had only waived his NTC for Miami which I found curious given that he went to Clemson just down the road from Charlotte. Given his current legal situation it makes me wonder if there are some things in Charlotte he'd rather not get that close to. Also, Charlotte tends to be a bit more religious than most places and I don't think his current situation would sit well with a number of people there.
  17. I think what he's saying is that this case has some specific circumstances that won't apply to all future cases of relocation. If a future lease were expired or it could be proven that the league negotiated in good faith that would establish a different situation from what happened in STL thus the outcome would likely be different in that instance. If I read that incorrectly feel free to correct me.
  18. You mean the stadium the Rams left because St. Louis wouldn't build them a new one? So they're going to get an expansion team, fine. How long before the stadium shakedown starts again? In settling for an expansion franchise in lieu of payment they'd be accepting that they then need to spend a billion dollars on a stadium almost immediately for someone else to profit while the NFL itself who is offering the settlement pays nothing and actually profits from the expansion fee they will charge to the new owner. The Texans owner paid 700 million dollars almost 20 years ago. I think it's fair to say a new STL team would be valued at at least 1.3-1.5 billion. Rather than the current owners paying over a billion, they'd stand to make over a billion, while STL would be back on the hook to pay for future NFL whims. Again, if I'm STL I say F that. Pay me. The only scenario under which I agree to accepting a franchise in lieu of money is if the league agrees to community ownership of the new team so it can never be yoinked away again. I doubt they will do that so f you NFL, pay me.
  19. How does awarding a franchise, that they sell mind you, to a 3rd party make the city of St. Louis whole? Unless they are going to award the team to the actual city, for free, I'd tell them to pound sand. I'd rather have billions of dollars if I were the city of St. Louis rather than a ticket back into the circus that screwed you twice already.
  20. It's the only logo in sports with observable genitalia.
  21. The city, that really needs the money any way they can get it and yes, it moves some money from the suburbs back into the city.
  22. I don't even care about what the neighborhood is like, the bigger issue is that it's an island away from everything and it was built that way on purpose. It's really hard to undo that
×
×
  • Create New...