Jump to content

jad1

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jad1

  1. The might not have great measurables, but neither did Brady.

     

    During his Heismann season, he threw something like 40 TDs. His on-the-field performance should buy him a 4th string QB position during training camp somewhere in the league.

     

    If he's knees are really a concern, the Chiefs, and other teams, should just tell him to retire.

  2. 'I had big goals, and then things went down for me,'' he said, ``but I couldn't sit there and feel sorry for myself. What it did was make me more humble and make me want to work hard. I look at every practice and every game as if it's my last. I felt like the first two games I didn't play to my potential. Some people feel sorry for themselves and keep going down the same path. You reap what you sow.''

     

    call me crazy, but that doesn't sound like a stupid person.

    326414[/snapback]

     

    Do you know if he was drooling all over himself when he said this?

     

    Long as he learns his plays, catches footballs and stays out of trouble his wonderlic test is meaningless. He's not the coach, he's a speed receiver.

     

    The first time Parrish has to answer a trivia question (like who's the king of France) in order to score a TD, the Bills will be screwed. Until then, everything is fine.

  3. I think Campy's answer is a cop-out. Sure, you judge the draft as a whole in a couple of years after judging the contribution, but you can definitely judge the general value obtained from the picks made.

     

    Did you reach in the 2nd for a player who most had rated as a third rounder, or did you take a 1st round talent who slid?

     

    Did you stumble into a guy in the 3rd round who was a first or second round talent, or draft a guy who was probably a decent but not outstanding 3rd round value who is still going to be a project who won't help much this year when there were still some guys who definitely could at other need positions?

     

    Did you take a 6th or 7th-round value guy in the 4th when some first-day type talent was still available at that same position?

     

    These are fair questions to ask immediately after a draft, and so far, if you're a Bills fan, you ain't liking the answers.

    316370[/snapback]

     

    Man, if these are the questions, Pats fans must be losing their minds right now!

  4. To me the fact that Detroit keeps drafting awesome players every year and never does anything says more about mgt and staff then it does the players......

     

    I personally have no problem with Parish as our 3rd receiver.....although I question where a 3rd receiver should be drafted....

     

    I am of the opinion that in no way does Parish mean Moulds is gone......but I also dont beleive that Moulds will around next year with that huge cap hit.....I think we will either bring in a vet to replace him or use our 1st round pick on a big physical receiver to replace him........and that saddens me because I would like to see Moulds retire a bill......

    315709[/snapback]

     

    Both Bethel Johnson and Deion Branch were drafted in the 2nd round, neither to be starters (Patten and Brown were the starters). Branch, the Super Bowl MVP, is an undersized receiver at 5'9".

     

    NE has managed to use their speed to take advantage mismatches in the defense. No doubt Donahoe would like to do the same with Evans and Parrish.

     

    And, you're right, replacing Moulds with Parrish would be like replacing Andre Reed with Don Beebe. They're completely different receivers.

  5. Unfortunately,  I can't help but feel that  :D is right.  I like the two picks themselves,  but in the context of the team's needs,  particularly the OL,  I have at least some reservations about this draft to this point.  I can't help but feel that this OL is really going to come back to bite us this season.  Then again,  maybe the Bills felt this OL draft class really sucked,  but I still think its going to be painful to watch unless Donahoe can either hit a home run with a day 2 pick or find another decent FA.

    315386[/snapback]

     

    I think that what we're missing here is that the Bills offense lacked speed. Aside from Evans, where were the downfield threats for the team?

     

    Moulds is more of a power guy, and Aiken, Reed and Campbell only encouraged defenses to load up the box.

     

    The team had a need to threaten the deep middle of the defense to move the safeties and linebackers off the ball. These two picks meet that need. This will give McGahee more room to operate.

     

    And if the Bills don't get a OT in the draft, Donahoe will grab Walker or Shelton after June 1st. Would you rather McNally work with one of these former 1st round picks or with a rookie like Adam Terry? To me, I slightly favor the veterens.

  6. :D

    even if they had the skill to do it (which they don't), our OLine doesn't have the endurance to run the KGun.  at best Anderson and Williams would get winded, at worst they'd drop dead of a heart attack

    315623[/snapback]

     

    There's a difference between the K-gun formation and the no-huddle.

     

    The K-gun, 3 WR, TE, HB, formation will force teams out of loading up the box, stretching the field horizontally. They can run this formation outside the no-huddle.

     

    The Bills can now put two speedy WRs, Parrish and Evans outside, and a big WR in the middle, Moulds.

     

    They have a TE with potential to exploit the middle of the defense and block on running plays.

     

    And they have McGahee, who runs, blocks, and catches well.

     

    Of course, on draft day, this is all based on potential. But the talent they have on the roster last season (Reed, Aiken, and Campbell) was better suited for a power game, and had trouble stretching the field..

  7. I think that this draft so far is a measure of how the coaching staff viewed the production out of the QB position in '03 and '04.  In retrospect, I think they blame the offensive woes on chiefly one player.  I think that they're justified in that thinking.

    315614[/snapback]

     

    I also think it shows that the team believes there was a lack of speed on the field. As much as Bledsoe couldn't avoid the rush, Reed, Shaw, and Aiken couldn't stretch the field. Even Moulds isn't the speediest WR out there.

     

    For the first time in years, the Bills might be able to run the K-gun formation, and put some fear into defenses. This is going to give McGahee much more room to operate, and take pressure off the O-line.

  8. We should have drafted CB Justin Miller or DT Annaj. Hawthorne both rated a 91 on Mel kipers 2005 Draft Report blue book but, no we take a wide receiver what the hell is TD smoking don't get me wrong Parrish is a fine player but not a need pick.  Frank Coyle in his Draft Report rated Parrish an 80.  Where is the o-line help?.  I liked Adam Terry or David Baas.  What about Travis Henry is he going to rot on the bench.  We should have moved up in the second round to take Khali Barnes or David Baas.  There are ten teams that have really helped themselves in the draft.  The Ravens, Eagles, Chargers, Titans, Jets, Browns,Vikings, Cowboys, Panthers and Bears to name a few.

    315557[/snapback]

     

    Donahoe did try to move up the draft, trying to package a move with Henry, but he had no takers. All the possible trading partners, Ari, Phil, TB, and even Tenn took Henry-like runners in the draft.

     

    And while they Bills do have needs at OT and DT, it should be noted that they had a difficult time stretching the field all through 2003 and the beginning part of 2004.

     

    Donahoe and Modrack probably believe that the team needs more than Lee Evans to spread the field for McGahee.

     

    Who knows, maybe Munoz or Hawthorne will fall in the 4th round to the Bills, or they'll nab Shelton when he's cut from Arizona. Whoever they put at LT, will face fewer 8 man fronts thanks to the extra speed on the field.

  9. Wonder far into the season the Bills opponents will realize the anti-Bledsoe defense won't work against the Bills?  My guess is about 8 games.

    315556[/snapback]

     

    It'll be a lot sooner if Losman (or Holcombe) can hit single covered recievers down the field from the middle of a rush. If either of them can do that, it'll be more like 2 games.

  10. If our O-line can even manage to be average, our offense should be a handful.

    315538[/snapback]

     

    I agree. The Bills haven't had this much talent at the skill positions since the SB years.

     

    Two years ago they started Shaw, Reed, and Burns against the Eagles.

     

    McNally has his work cut out, but this is getting interesting.

  11. If we can get Brian Kelly from Tampa bay i would ship Nate out.

    313094[/snapback]

     

    Brian Kelly had 4 ints last year for 101 yards and no TDs. Barber had 3 for 23 yards and no TDs.

     

    Neither returned punts or kickoffs.

     

    Clements had 6 ints for 77 yards and 1 TD. He returned 35 punts for 327 yards and 1 TD.

     

    So by making a deal for either Barber or Kelly and trading Clements would weaken both the Bills secondary and punt return team.

     

    Weakening areas of strength is not a good way to make a playoff run.

  12. It's a classic lose-lose for TD and the Bills. Keep Clements for 2005 and then he walks to Washington and what everyone knows will now be a $55+ million contract offer and then everyone and their mother will be bitching how the Bills got nothing for Clemens. If the Bills trade him for a first round pick now, everyone will be bitching how the Bills are rebuilding again and why did they let him go and not try and resign him for $4-$5 million a season. I say trade him right now and get someone who will be here for 3-4 years at a cheaper price. That's they way the NFL works nowadays.

    313075[/snapback]

     

     

    The Bills win if Clements improves on his effort from last year. 8-9 picks, with a few TDs make the Bills a clear winner, regardless of what he decides to do next year.

  13. There's no way in hell the Bills should make a deal like Miami did. Saban got rooked because he was looking to dump salary. Donahoe would be a fool to do the same.

     

    Can you imagine Nate Clements for a 2nd rounder? Give me a break. This guy's going to have a monster contract year, and everyone's willing to throw that away because he MIGHT walk. Sorry, but that's a loser mentality.

     

    Let him play and contribute. If the Bills make the playoffs, make him decide if he wants to stay with a winner (that he helped to build), or make more money in a loony-bin like Washington.

     

    That's how the Pats and Eagles would do it.

  14. I found these stats snooping around. I cannot prove their accuracy, but they came from stats,inc. As Yogi would say, you can look it up.

     

    LJ Shelton has played 6 years in the NFL, 5 of them as a LT. He has missed about one full season with injury. His strength is as a run  blocker and his weakness as a pass blocker, and in those six years he has given up 29 sacks. This is on the Cardinals, mind you, with one of the worst teams and offenses and coaching in the league over those 6 years. Here are the stats for the best LTs in the game over those years from the same site

     

    In comparison to 2005 tackle pro bowlers(sacks allowed over the past 6 years):

    Orlando Pace: 28

    Walter Jones: 27

    Jonathan Ogden: 25

    Tarik Glenn: 25

    Flozell Adams: 29.5

    Tra Thomas: 39.5

    Willie Road: 26

    Willie Anderson: 22

    312606[/snapback]

     

    Shelton has had to do something right to keep Leonard Davis at guard for the first couple years of his career. I still think Shelton's a good fit at LT for the Bills, and would prefer him to the rookie OTs in the draft.

  15. Do others think they paid to high a price for Feeley. 3rd pick in round two or 35th overall.

    311879[/snapback]

     

    You think? :huh:

     

    Brown is the only guy that worries me when thinking about the Dolphins pick. With an aging defense, a half-way decent running back might be able to get them back around .500, but that's a big might.

     

    I'm hoping that they pick a QB, because by the time the QB is ready to go, they'll have to replace half their D.

  16. Of course I have. For over 40 years.

     

    You must go to some very posh pool halls.

     

    Just in case, you and I are not enemies, KRC. We disagree on this subject...

    311859[/snapback]

     

    Actually, I don't. The dives, to me, are better. And even in the dives, I've never had a problem.

  17. ...and D&B is not just a pool hall. In fact, in the Philly location, the section for pool tables covers about 1-2% of the total square footage of the place. Hell, it is smaller than either of the bars or any of the various food sections.

    311850[/snapback]

     

    Yeah, that's why I can understand their point about the pool tables. They do require space, which drives up rent. I looked into opening a pool hall, but I couldn't make the numbers work without having at least 10-20 tables.

  18. Are you sure they are doing well, or riding on a bubble of eager (see Barnum) franchise buyers?  I'm sure you realize what Ponzi schemes are, and the passage of time until ithey burst...

     

    Sorry - pool players buy booze and drop quarters, but sale of food is where the money is.

    311813[/snapback]

     

    Have you ever been in a pool hall? They all sell food now, along with booze and soda.

     

    I've been going to pool halls, with my wife, friends, and younger relatives, around the country, for the past 20 years, and I've never had a problem with the clientele. Not once.

     

    And in a real pool hall, it costs more than quarters to play pool. During peak hours, the charge is usually between 7 and 10 dollars per person, per hour. Roughly the cost of a movie ticket.

  19. It's April 2005; who the hell cares what Clements is going to cost the Bills in 2006. Especially since 2006 is when the new TV contract kicks in, which will completely blow this year's cap figure out of the water.

     

    There's nothing wrong with Clements playing out his contract this year and then letting him walk in 2006 if he's deemed too expensive. Teams like the Pats, Eagles, and Steelers let players walk all the time.

     

    Let the Bills benefit from Clements contract year, and then decide what to do with him with him when the 2006 cap is set. That's the best move the team can make.

×
×
  • Create New...