BuffaloHokie13

Shhh, I'm gaming the rep system for cheap laugh emojis.

Alright, where the heck is this @Logic guy? He usually makes his picks almost immediately!

No. Many people thought that he was the only viable starting QB on the roster for week 1. viable =/= good by the way

I'm pretty sure most of that anger was because Peterman remained on the roster.

In our board mock this played out. My initial offer as Washington was 15, 76, and 153. Buffalo wanted a second out of the deal and asked what it would take. Ultimately we swapped 9 & 112 for 15 & 46. I evaluated both offers with the Rich Hill base 100 values (I don't like the base 1000 or JJ chart as much).

Politicians Often Take Unintelligent Stances.

I don't think the value is there this year to take him at 40, for instance. Our FO has certainly leaned towards talent and a high ceiling early, but they also chose Zay Jones in the second whom wasn't really a high ceiling type. Based on what I see in this year's class I think the first 2 selections are going to be athletically gifted, and then we'll start compromising a bit in the name of process oriented types.

Wouldn't it be so... Bortlesy?

?

I think you'll be alright. He's got potentially 3 more hours, and then you've got 4. Or that ?

Interesting choice here for the Bengals. Several good players at positions of need.

Sam is the designated whitewalker killer in defense of women and children.

The initial offer was 1st (15), 3rd (76) , and 5th (153) for 9

It's not verified yet! Schefter tweeted that from my hospital room! ? But yeah, if trade back wins that's the deal.

Sneak Peek!

Still negotiating a bit.

The board probably does not like my offer.

oh

There is also the Dan Morgan angle though.

Trade?

Yeah, they gave a 3rd and a 5th to move up from 15 to 10. That's around what one could reasonably expect again this year imo.

I'm looking at the empirical charts that are calculated from previous trades, which are far more accurate than the JJ chart, and the draft class itself. This class is nowhere close to the QB class last year was. It's more reminiscent of 2017, perhaps (where KC gave a future 1st (2nd in value) and a 3rd to go from 27 to 10). Moving up from the early teens to 9 is very unlikely to net a 2nd. Not with this draft class.

I really don't see the value, in this draft at least, to pick up a 2nd for moving from the 12-15 range to 9. Honestly, it might net us a 3rd.

Ravens or Redskins please

The irony here is incredible. so you're saying a lot of people got to take home more of their money and let it gain interest (or spend it, no judgement) as opposed to letting the government hold it all year?