BuffaloHokie13

Just type @ and then start typing their name. a list should populate and you can select them from it.

DK Metcalf. Maybe it's just my perception, but it seems like the Bills FO have put a lot more effort into researching the depth of DL, OL, and DB than WR. That tells me they're looking there early. The only potential wrench I see is if Ed Oliver falls to 9. He's the only guy I see them taking over DK. Adding smoke to this fire, the WR's that were researched the most by Buffalo are DK Metcalf, AJ Brown, and Damarkus Lodge. Maybe they like AJ's high floor more than DK's high ceiling, but I truly believe they were getting intel from his teammates.

Dolphins. Or at least that's what I guess in the where will the QB land thread.

Just make it a rule that every post in the thread is required to tag whoever is currently on the clock. That'd be sufficiently annoying!

Yeah, I like the base 100 one, but both are good. It also varies year to year. Considering the view of this class, those 2nd's are probably worth more than normal.

If I had to guess, Bandit was trying to avoid looking like a homer with his valuation. If I'm crafting that trade it probably looks more like 9, 112, & 154 for 23, 54, &55. That would put them at a 5% premium, which is pretty standard for the back end of the top 10.

We'd need to pace for 32 picks in the next 26 hours. Probably no more trades unless they are pre-negotiated, just for efficiency purposes.

that's fair. I was equally confused when the world was going to end in 12 years, but they decided to make projections through 2099 anyway.

If you want to continue you can start a thread (so you can edit the OP). I'll stick with it until tomorrow night at least, but if you PM me a good email for you I can grant you editing power for the sheet as well. If you like the look of the table you can use it as well rather than re-typing. I'm just copy pasting that from the sheet, but the forum seems to handle the formatting well. Surely @Virgil doesn't mind if he doesn't want to continue.

TSW 2019 Mock Draft No Trades 3 Round Round Pick Overall Value Team TSW User Player Position School 1 1 1 3000 Cardinals Reed83HOF Nick Bosa EDGE Ohio State 1 2 2 2600 49ers BuffAlone Quinnen Williams DT Alabama 1 3 3 2200 Jets RocCityRoller Josh Allen EDGE Kentucky 1 4 4 1800 Raiders NewEra Kyler Murray QB Oklahoma 1 5 5 1700 Buccaneers Chuck Wagon Ed Oliver DT Houston 1 6 6 1600 Giants mrags Devin White LB LSU 1 7 7 1500 Jaguars Just Joshin' Jawaan Taylor OT Florida 1 8 8 1400 Lions wppete Rashan Gary DL Michigan 1 9 9 1350 Redskins BuffaloHokie13 Dwayne Haskins QB Ohio State 1 10 10 1300 Broncos MrEpsYtown Jonah Williams OG Alabama 1 11 11 1250 Bengals whatdrought Devin Bush LB Michigan 1 12 12 1200 Steelers HappyDays DK Metcalf WR Ole Miss 1 13 13 1150 Dolphins turftoe Christian Wilkins DT Clemson 1 14 14 1100 Falcons RyanC883 Montez Sweat EDGE Mississippi State 1 15 15 1050 Bills TSW Poll TJ Hockenson TE Iowa 1 16 16 1000 Panthers YoloinOhio Brian Burns EDGE Florida State 1 17 17 950 Giants mrags Dexter Lawrence DL Clemson 1 18 18 900 Vikings TPS Andre Dillard OL Washington State 1 19 19 875 Titans bkep32 Noah Fant TE Iowa 1 20 20 850 Packers Logic Dalton Risner OL Kansas State 1 21 21 800 Seahawks Alphadawg7 Greedy Williams CB LSU 1 22 22 780 Buccaneers Chuck Wagon Josh Jacobs RB Alabama 1 23 23 760 Texans GunnerBill Cody Ford OL Oklahoma 1 24 24 740 Raiders NewEra Byron Murphy CB Washington 1 25 25 720 Eagles Golden Goat Johnathan Abram S Mississippi State 1 26 26 700 Colts aristocrat Jerry Tillery DL Notre Dame 1 27 27 680 Raiders NewEra Jeffery Simmons DL Mississippi State 1 28 28 660 Chargers EmotionallyUnstable Garrett Bradbury CB NC State 1 29 29 640 Patriots section122 Clelin Ferrell EDGE Clemson 1 30 30 620 Packers Logic Chancey Gardner-Johnson S Florida 1 31 31 600 Rams Virgil David Montgomery RB Iowa State 1 32 32 590 Patriots section122 Marquise Brown WR Oklahoma Trade Tracker Team 1 User 1 Offer Value Team 2 User 2 Offer Value Redskins BuffaloHokie13 15 & 46 1490 Bills TSW Poll 9 & 112 1420 Steelers HappyDays 20, 52, 122 1280 Packers Logic 12 & 185 1217 Seahawks Alphadawg7 Frank Clark, 84 --- Chiefs H2o 29, 92, 2020 2nd --- Buccaneers Chuck Wagon 39, 70, 145 783 Ravens Watkins101 22 & 191 794.6 Patriots section122 56, 64, 97, &101 818 Seahawks Alphadawg7 29 & 92 772

But really, I think the Rams are probably between EDGE and CB. Based on the players left that probably means Rock Ya-Sin or Jaylon Ferguson/LJ Collier. We'll see what Virgil comes up with.

Yeah, they have 32, 56, 64, and 73. They have 2 more at the end of the 3rd w/ 97 & 101. 6 picks in the top 101 is crazy this year, and I anticipate the Pats* having an unfortunately nice haul.

I've got him targeted for pick 74.

As per usual, we have some agreement and some disagreement. I like the first trade and think the value is solid there. Less so for the second trade, as well as the player selected with it. Always enjoy and respect the time you put in during offseasons and the resulting banter we get. Cheers bandito

#BelieveAllWomen* *Who accuse Republicans

@Virgil - I think the Rams should pick Marquise Brown

All good, I think it worked out fine! For reference Trade Tracker Team 1 User 1 Offer Value Team 2 User 2 Offer Value Redskins BuffaloHokie13 15 & 46 1490 Bills TSW Poll 9 & 112 1420 Steelers HappyDays 20, 52, 122 1280 Packers Logic 12 & 185 1217 Seahawks Alphadawg7 Frank Clark, 84 --- Chiefs H2o 29, 92, 2020 2nd --- Buccaneers Chuck Wagon 39, 70, 145 783 Ravens Watkins101 22 & 191 794.6 Patriots section122 56, 64, 97, &101 818 Seahawks Alphadawg7 29 & 92 772

You already traded 84 to the Chiefs for Frank Clark! I'm going to change it to pick 92 unless one of you objects @section122

I'm not thrilled with the bloat and I'm not convinced that everyone who is incarcerated deserves prison as opposed to alternatives. I think taxpayer money could be better spent elsewhere. If you don't think it's worth discussing, that's fine, but I disagree wholeheartedly.

There's consistency here though. Prison reform is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it is being discussed there. Climate Change is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it was approached in the GND. She is consistent with basing the absurdity in a topic worth discussion. That way, when she is called out she can pull back and say that her opponents do not see the value in discussing the base idea while ignoring that her approach was a complete bastardization of the discussion to begin with.

I mean, I very much enjoy this exercise, but once the draft starts Thursday I'm not paying much attention to this. I suppose there is some time during the day Friday, but we'll also already know by then how far off we were and probably not care.

Rosen - Cardinals Lock - Raiders @ 4 Haskins - Redskins in trade up to bottom half of top 10 Murray - Dolphins @ 13 Jones - Giants @ 17

Yeah, pace definitely needs to pick up if we want to finish before the draft.

And @NewEra is in Vegas, so he'll be around in another hour or so I'd imagine.

I think Tulsi and Andrew Yang are the most viable candidates to stand a chance against Trump, though as has been mentioned it's a long shot if the economy continues. But neither is really getting any support from the party. They'd rather have people who back the Green New Deal, or Open Borders, or Healthcare for All, or Wipe out student debt, or Eliminate ICE, or repeal the 2nd Amendment. It almost feels like a legitimate 3rd party is going to form from the results of 2020.