BuffaloHokie13

Ban

By my metrics he's been very inefficient since 2016. But really I was just making a joke about coachspeak

Depending on who you ask, Eli is playing his best football since McD was with the iggles!

He's going to decline allowing the pats* to visit after the superbowl. Any other team is welcome though.

Siemian

Agreed, he sucks at both of those!

He got some ST snaps too, which feels new.

Oh right, because Rodak knows what was called on the field. The players had to console Zay in the locker room, but it probably wasn't his fault.

Jordan Peterson is smart. No Canadian is trusted. Just saying.

Blue dress, black lacey stripes.

QB throws to a spot and Zay cuts the other direction, who is that on? Again, there's a reason his rate was significantly higher than the rest of the team.

Good routes and correct routes are sometimes different things. Getting open on tape without knowledge of the playcall and being open in the designed spot can be different. Getting open in general can be good depending on your offensive scheme and QB (Rodgers, Wilson, Ben, Watson, etc. like to play improv ball). Our OC is from the NE system, where the QB makes a read and throws to a spot most of the time. There was even talk about how AB would do in NE since he likes to freelance and Brady relies on structure and receivers being exactly where he expects them. This doesn't really warrant a response since we've been over it before. Zay's uncatchable rate was significantly higher than every other receiver on the team. I'm sure that's just coincidence though. I know, I know. Stats are totally bogus unless you feel they help your narrative, then you'll attempt to use them. Agreed. Not sure how we got to that assignment for him.

The math shows he's getting used/open at the same rate as Brown & Beasley when he's on the field. The production on the targets was poor though, bad rate of return. The snap counts say he's WR3. If Brown & Beasley are combining for 15-20 targets per game, there will be a few outlet passes to the RB, say 3-5, and they're going to target the TE another 2-5 times that's already 20-30 of Allen's attempts in any given game. I'm just not seeing much more opportunity for Zay than maybe 5 targets +/- 2. Especially when he's not turning those opportunities into production. And that's before also introducing Foster (who's been mysteriously invisible) and McKenzie on some gadget plays or screens. Not sure on others. Zay has been known to run the wrong routes and not be in the right place or take the right angles. That's why I'm inclined to believe the overthrow was on Zay for that particular attempt.

I'll be honest, on the 'overthrow' I said in real time that that's why Foster should play instead of Zay (blamed it on Zay not being a good receiver).

To be fair, 5/37 is still 13.5% of our passes. Also, 5 targets on 29 snaps means he was targeted over 17% of the time he was in the game which is exactly in line with Brown & Beasley (17% & 19% respectively)

I prefer their interface for fantasy sports too, but that's about it.

Nah. This is a compiled list of every single thing every Giants fan has said so far this week. They're just a pretty quiet bunch.

Does vaping have some sort of positive benefits like killing pain?

Yeah. I'm pretty sure probable cause is almost entirely limited to arrests, limited detainment and search warrants

That's a false equivalence. The police will certainly come out, because that is their job, but they aren't going to immediately put someone in cuffs unless they're presented with evidence of a crime. Basically they don't show up because they presume guilt, they show up to gather evidence and react accordingly.

Shouldn't the first response always be 'Why do you say that?' I.e. provide proof please

I love the touchscreen kiosks at McDonald's. My orders are always entered correctly now!

Trusted Canadian, clearly.

Even during the game, Gannon mentioned that 'these things happen when you aren't an accurate thrower' after the Beasley INT.

Josh is on pace for 160 carries this year. He ran plenty.