BuffaloHokie13

Yep, sacks count as an attempt, or rather a touch, and the yards are subtracted out from the total. Turnovers are INTs and Fumbles Lost.

Nah, 3 screens.

5/8 for 320 and 3 TDs. Then we start to run the clock out in the 2nd quarter

The biggest thing to realize is that my system is a comparative system. So it won't churn out a number for a single player. It compares a QBs efficiency of production against their peers (this makes qualification criteria vitally important for adequate results). The score is out of 100. 90 of that 100 is based on production, which equates to yards per touch, total td%, and turnover% in my opinion. Within those 3 stats, I give the most credit for TD%, then yards, and finally turnovers. This breaks everything down to a per attempt basis, which allows for fair comparisons between QBs regardless of total attempts. The final 10 is a weight based on the QBs attempts per game, which is my way of capturing how much the QB is asked to do for their team. This way, a QB that is asked to do more will always get the nod over a comparable QB who does less. The system can be volatile early in the year, but tends to hit a groove around the midpoint of a season. I'll be doing a couple in depth posts once week 9 is in the books with some observations and commentary.

?‍♂️ I disagree with everything after Russ Wilson lol. As far as Allen and the sophomores, I've got them at: 7. Lamar Jackson 13. Sam Darnold (sample size is much smaller than the others) 25. Josh Allen 31. Baker Mayfield 32. Josh Rosen

B- The grade speaks for itself.

I'm not sure what it is, but I feel good about this prediction.

IIRC he said 10 mistakes because whoever was at pick 10 traded out

Hopefully Sam didn't give him mono! ?

Redemption for Peterman, though he'll always be the first. 5 in the first half. Let's get it!

Kind of like the trade that netted us Hughes. I think Shaq could use a change of scenery, despite improving this year. Vic had 1 year where he really flashed as a pass rusher, but his overall career stats are very similar to shaq's on a per game basis. I take a shot on his production rising when he's drawing less attention here than in Atlanta.

Shaq Lawson for Vic Beasley

Allen wasn't Allen in that game though. He was completely in his head and the moment looked too big for him. I think that game was an opportunity for growth, but I had 0 faith that he would pull anything off.

It utilizes: Yards per touch (pass + rush - sack / total attempts including rushes and sacks) TD% (total TDs / total attempts) TO% (ints + fumbles lost / total attempts) And then it weights those slightly based on number of total attempts per game to give more credit to QBs that are asked to do more for their team.

Color coding is just for visual. Darkest green is best in said category, darkest red is worst. Also QB Rating, which it's sorted by, is my version of the stat. Passer rating is the traditional one, and it's a couple columns to the left

Here's everyone's rookie campaign since 2011, fwiw.

I was about to lol I can't prove it, but I feel like a lot of the people in this thread saying he only has 12 catches through 5 games are the same people saying Zay deserves more chances because it takes 3 years for a WR to develop.

Yeah. Expecting that, though it's probably similar to the prices here in DC. I'm thinking about trying to see all of the bridges in central park.

Headed to NYC for the weekend. Never been, so it should be fun.

I don't know if you're purposely being obtuse or if you just don't understand my point. We are 12th in the league in yards per game and we're 26th in points per game. That's because we aren't finishing drives.

They need to improve at finishing drives. Until I see more consistency there I'm going to be a little skeptical.

Most of them bounced off Zay's hands first.

I'll wait, but I won't hold my breath.

They haven't flipped to the left. They've shifted to the center in an effort to pick up the audience that CNN and MSNBC have abandoned for 24/7 conspiracy nonsense. Most of that audience is centrist leaning left.

I thought our cafeteria was considered pretty good, but that would be next level!