BuffaloHokie13

I literally just scanned the ones from 3-4 weeks ago. And that's just one outlet. I take it you don't trust snopes, since you completely ignored that post? I'm not walking back anything. I provided you his entire quote from 2/28 along with Snopes' conclusion - "Despite creating some confusion with his remarks, Trump did not call the coronavirus itself a hoax."

www.youtube.com/user/CNN/videos

At the time (2/28) the big talking points were that Trump was ignoring Fauci, which Fauci himself has refuted, that Trump was withholding resources from states, and that he was creating false hope - because we all know that real leaders incite panic during a crisis.

@whatdrought basically already made it. I'll be driving too, but will update the sheet once I get home, and I'll make the pick post if I don't see one.

Here's snopes. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-coronavirus-rally-remark/ "What's False Despite creating some confusion with his remarks, Trump did not call the coronavirus itself a hoax." Also, the full quote: "Now the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. You know that, right? Coronavirus. They’re politicizing it. We did one of the great jobs. You say, ‘How’s President Trump doing?’ They go, ‘Oh, not good, not good.’ They have no clue. They don’t have any clue. They can’t even count their votes in Iowa, they can’t even count. No they can’t. They can’t count their votes. One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax. But you know, we did something that’s been pretty amazing. We’re 15 people [cases of coronavirus infection] in this massive country. And because of the fact that we went early, we went early, we could have had a lot more than that."

I still think he was a better fit for what Daboll ideally wants to do on O than Allen, but Allen has progressed very well so far.

The Congressional Democrats weaponizing it against him, like the Ukraine 'hoax' and the Russia 'hoax'.

Josh Doctson was another I absolutely loved and wished we picked.

Loved Rosen. Still do to some extent, as his circumstances have been about as bad as imaginable. But he certainly hasn't produced at this point.

Good pick, though I thought you'd go with Swift to give Ekeler a break.

If were were to come away with KJ Hamler in rd2, Cameron Dantzler in rd3, and Darrynton Evans in rd4 I'd be thrilled.

Nah, that was me. Some of your ***** is just plain over the top and makes the conversation incredibly uncomfortable. Get a grip, attack the facts. Leave the personal, especially the non-board related, crap out of it. The passive aggressive using people's name stuff has absolutely no place here and it's completely disrespectful.

With the 33rd pick in the 2020 NFL Draft, the Cincinnati Bengals select Austin Jackson, OT, USC. Zack Baun sitting there was incredibly tempting, as was Tee Higgins who we felt could learn a lot under AJ Green, but with the loss of Cordy Glenn and Jonah Williams coming off injury we felt we needed the talent at OT to keep Joe Exotic upright. @Philo and the Indianapolis Colts are on the clock.

???

TDN has their top needs as CB, IOL, RB. So its Terrell, Ruiz, or Swift. We're 10 mins past 2 hours so I'll let you officialize it since I don't see Virgil right now

@whatdrought @Virgil could be diggs or terrell I guess

I'm thinking the Chiefs are between Cesar Ruiz, D'Andre Swift, Austin Jackson, and Zack Baun. I'm not making the pick because I'm on deck.

I wonder if Hurts is in the cards or if there was animosity between him and Daboll

Now, now. The moron might be a dem. They aren't mutually exclusive!

we can hope.

The Bengals are very excited about several of the prospects remaining on the board! I don't want to be accused of cheating, so hopefully @Virgil can make the pick if @Buffalo716 times out.

Yeah, like Donte Whitner at pick 8 or Torell Troup at pick 41

3 of the boards have 150+ players on them, but at some point the owners are picking names from a list instead of players they like

Ruggs I compared to Tyreek Hill. I think Hamler has a bit more return ability in him.

if he were on the Bills I'm moving him between X, Z, and Slot depending on alignment and personnel on D. Anywhere away from Diggs.