BuffaloHokie13

Welcome!

Yeah, a lot of it will come down to wording I'm sure. And my guess is that the policy is fairly vague, as that has been typical for the NFL. Of course, this is all assuming it doesn't just get thrown out by the judge upon initial review.

Hard to have a precedent for a policy that was only in place a month or 2 before the infraction, no?

Bucs just named Winston their starter officially

You mean the speculation necessary because Brady* destroyed his phone? Or the assumptions that were made because the Pats* didn't provide McNally and Jastremski for follow up interviews about the messaages?

I think if we score more points than the defense allows on a game by game basis the season will go well

AZ has someone who can remotely compete with Jordan Palmer's older brother?

You really should read the decision. The science is only one small piece of it.

He has the best ball skills of any of our corners

Well there is a Physics Professor from Princeton who disagrees with you. You might want to read Goodell's Appeal Decision

Goodell said in his decline for an appeal that the non-logo gauge was used and there's ample evidence to prove it. It's in footnote 1 on page 7 of the report if you're curious.

I'm not against it, just thought it was interesting. I like the sounds of Gilmore-Graham-A.Williams-Darby/McLovin as the starting secondary

And Graham over Duke Williams

Sal Capaccio ‏@SalSports 11m11 minutes ago Ronald Darby gets his first interception. Picks off Cassel on deep ball Tyler Dunne ✔ @TyDunne First two 11 of 11 snaps for EJ Manuel are fumbled. Maybe it's the M.C. Hammer playing... Mike Rodak ✔ @mikerodak Matt Cassel and Tyrod Taylor taking 1st team reps today in 11-11s. Taylor just scrambled and threw TD to Goodwin.

Bobby Wagner ‏@Bwagz54 14m14 minutes ago Can't keep everyone

I thought Goodell's appeal denial said specifically that 1st offenses for a substance not even proven to give an advantage (which seems appropriate since the accusation is a deliberate violation of the rules, but it's impact is debatable) is 4 games, and a masking agent bumps that to 6 games.

I mean I can't say for certain, but I have to believe if Tom just came out and said, "Yeah, my bad, I won't do it again" then he'd have been fined 25-50k and life would've moved on. Their denial of all wrongdoing sparked the investigation that cost the league $5M. Without the investigation there is no lack of cooperation and nobody gives a lick about Tom Brady's cell phone.

Stars get beneficial calls in every sport. It's not exclusive to the Pats* or the NFL itself.

It starts out similar, but the article doesn't link to any other relevant information. We don't know if the Kicker denied all accusations or accepted them. Or if he destroyed a cell phone the day he was set to be interviewed that may or may not have had relevant information on it. The Jets certainly didn't publicly demand an apology from the league because of it. The differences just go to show you that Tom and the Pats* really were the ones to blow this whole thing out of proportion.

Best pic I could find so far

I can't imagine what would happen if they called offensive PI every time Gronk pushed off. Not to say he wouldn't be great any more, but it seems to be a habit of his

Any chance you'll be in attendance labor day? You're welcome at our tailgate if so!

I don't know, but apparently they call him dubs

Yeah, I got that line in early may after I saw the line was 20.5 in late April

glad I got in on the 18.5 line