BuffaloHokie13

His jersey number is 5, which may have also been indicated on the stat page

TO didn't even know how to celebrate until he was corrupted by that ego maniac Jerry Rice

If only we did this the first time McKelvin muffed a punt, or at least took him out of that role for the game

He's quieted down now that they're losing more, but Richard Sherman.

Similar/related stat: Last week was the first time in his career that Russell Wilson won a game where Seattle's D allowed 25 or more points. He was 0-13 (I think) in those games prior to last week. Also, while it's certainly no excuse since some were poorly thrown balls, 3 of his 4 INT's have hit our receiver's hands prior to being intercepted.

We need the Safety from Duke to replace Duke at Safety.

A review adviser to sit in the booth and watch replays very carefully.

Well he's 0-3 when the opponent scores 24 or more points. Today was the first time in Russell Wilson's career that he won when the opponent scored 25 or more. Today was mostly on the defense and coaches (specifically those advising Rex on challenges).

264 Passing 239 Punting 503 Total

I know it's not about the prospects, but they're reporting Justin Fuente will replace Beamer and Bud Foster will be retained. Now if only we can get Paxton Lynch to stay in school and transfer with his coach

An NFL front office needs to be like the weather. Regardless of what some people predict it to do, and regardless of others' criticism of it, just do what you need to do.

When he retired I wondered what a team would be like if Peyton Manning was the OC and Ray Lewis was the DC. Still wondering.

Bill Belichick was a .500 coach before Brady became his starter. He was a sub .500 coach before the Pats* job.

I don't recall much from the Cincy game, but London was a headset debacle, so difficult to tell.

Heck, if you go by power rankings (I know you disagree with that criteria a bit though) we lose to the chiefs and still make it in as a 6 seed

Every time there was a FG or punt the announcers made a point to mention whether the wind was at their back or they were kicking into it.

Yes, I have us losing to Dallas because we are undisciplined at home

I put in what I expect to happen each week, got the following: AFC: NFC: 1. NE (16-0) 1. CAR (14-2) 2. CIN (14-2) 2. GB (13-3) 3. DEN (11-5) 3. ARI (13-3) 4. INDY (9-7) 4. NYG (10-6) 5. PIT (11-5) 5. MINN (10-6) 6. BUF (10-6) 6. ATL (10-6) Based on that I like Arizona over NE in the SB. Also, based on those records the Bills will get pick 26 in the draft, and the top ten are: 1. TENN (3-13) 2. BAL (3-13) 3. SF (4-12) 4. CLE (4-12) 5. SD (4-12) 6. WAS (5-11) 7. CHI (5-11) 8. NO (5-11) 9. MIA (5-11) 10. PHI (5-11)

Sometimes they even blow inadvertently.

I would have to say yes sounds like a claim, not a theory. Regardless, we had a streak where neither QB got much help from our depleted skill players and it sucked.

Claiming EJ would score more points in games he didn't play in is like claiming Tyrod would have won the games he didn't play in. It's pointless conjecture.

He was at Oregon with Nike backing, maybe he goes to Maryland with Under Armour backing

Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Right, my bad. Shady did. Watkins played a half for the Cincy game. Clay has more targets than anyone on the team, right? I agree we need to have plays designed to get Watkins the ball specifically, whether it's a screen or an end around or whatever, it can't just be go routes.

Isn't that the Tennessee game? Our runs achieved a total of 51 yards on 20 carries without Tyrod, we didn't have Watkins at all (Watkins played in both of EJ's games) and in the Jacksonville game we got Shady back.