BuffaloHokie13

My edit is what I believe we are seeing in the stats from that tweet. Nearly 100 days is still a good while and a lot can change.

She isn't my doctor, you're correct. Excellent deduction skills.

Over half of a party's voter base submitting their vote by mail would certainly seem to be unprecedented

Kinda like how me saying at least we can all agree that you can be skeptical of a doctor's opinion on the pandemic was a defense of demon lady when in reality my point was simply that past crazy opinions do not invalidate new opinions by default. Maybe she's right, maybe she isn't. Strongest defense ever!

Do you think that, as POTUS, he should personally vet every person before retweeting them? Or do you think, perhaps, someone asked him if he saw the video of the doctor seeing positive results from HCQ and he retweeted it without even thinking because he's a narcissist and revels in his opinions to be reaffirmed?

Interesting. I feel like I've seen mixed messages health experts on that - and I think that probably comes down to their definition of 'work'. I assumed she made statements about HCQ. I feel like the baseline stance on masks is, 'well it couldn't hurt'. Opinions on their effectiveness vary pretty widely. The excuses about oxygen deprivation are particularly dumb.

Like I said, I haven't watched the video. What misinformation did he retweet?

Going back to FDR, only 4 presidents have peak disapproval below 50%. Ford (46%), Kennedy (30%), Eisenhower (36%), and FDR (46%). So you're positive that it's misinformation? There's absolutely no way that her observations are correct?

You are confused. I'm not defending her. I haven't even watched the video. I just see incredible irony in the group saying believe doctors scrambling to invalidate a doctor. Kind of like the group that says believe all women quashing a woman who comes forward with a claim against Biden. I also think that the entire concept of a prior bad opinion invalidating other unrelated opinions is incredibly dangerous, because everyone has had a bad opinion at some point. So I'm glad we at least agree on that.

Call it whatever you want. Does it invalidate every statement she makes for the rest of her life? Yes or no?

So it is your belief that if anyone ever claims anything wildly outlandish they will never be correct about anything else for the rest of their life?

You might want to re-read what I said. Her previous statements do effect her overall credibility, but they do not make all future statements invalid by default. I literally started my post by saying that being a doctor doesn't make your statements beyond scrutiny.

So, does everyone agree at this point that being a doctor does not mean your statements about the pandemic are above scrutiny? Because I've seen a lot of people talking about how dumb it is to believe a random on Facebook over a doctor - and generally I agree with that - but you should still process what doctors are saying to determine whether you should listen or look for more information. Doctors make mistakes, heck their work is called practice. That lady might be correct. Her previous statements have no bearing on the validity of the statements in the video, though they certainly give insight on her credibility overall. How do you feel about the HCQ study that used the wrong dosage based on the wrong drug?

I find the quote to be pretty humorous. From what I understand, he tends to do a lot of self-deprecating humor at his rallies and this feels like it is in the same vein.

Wouldn't the ratings indicate how many people he's providing information to?

Same reason many women never come forward in the first place. She wasn't taken seriously and got put on public opinion trial for speaking up. She made her claim and, unfortunately for her, he was protected.

Trick question. Androids aren't people.

I mean, is there any chance that the AG wasn't aware of those actions because they didn't happen as described?

They also didn't throw anything, light any fires, or destroy any property. The description of 'storming is exceptionally pathetic considering everyone who entered the building waited in line and was subjected to temperature checks. Also, to my knowledge, any ww2 era Germany references were being applied to the governor, not being worn by the protesters. If I recall the signs correctly, they stated 'hail Whitmer'.

If I had to write a book I'd find a way to sneak Margot Robbie in too!

Way too many. Why do they keep blocking the troops from being pulled out?

And the false labeling of @plenzmd1 makes it's way to PPP. Apparently logic:trump supporters::personal responsibility:white people

You do understand the difference between bias, opinion, and satire, right? Yes, people post the Babylon Bee. They tend to keep it to Greg's stashes and the thread dedicated to bee pieces.

The Onion? Really? Please tell me this is a joke post. Also, why would you pollute a legitimate thread with satire?

People are left to defend their ideas themselves rather than having moderators censor half of the debate like some other social media sites.