Mojo44
Community Member-
Posts
1,502 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mojo44
-
Dolphins 21 Bills 17 Postgame Thread
Mojo44 replied to Hapless Bills Fan's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
The truth is, we also need some new running backs. Shady seems over the hill right now. Ivory is just what he is, you put him in when your main guy needs a breather. It’s not all the offense of line when it comes to the running game. There is something wrong when your quarterback is your best runner. -
2nd Half Thread: Bills vs. Dolphins at 1 PM ET on CBS
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Zay is quickly changing my mind about him -
1st Half Thread: Bills vs. Dolphins at 1 PM ET on CBS
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Cro-Magnon. And I am being generous. -
1st Half Thread: Bills vs. Dolphins at 1 PM ET on CBS
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Chip missing -
1st Half Thread: Bills vs. Dolphins at 1 PM ET on CBS
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Drop -
1st Half Thread: Bills vs. Dolphins at 1 PM ET on CBS
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Stunted -
Fumble into endzone rule needs to change
Mojo44 replied to Buffalo Barbarian's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
A rather severe penalty is indicated if a team tries to fumble a ball forward into the end zone hoping one of their players recovers it to score a touchdown, usually in a desperate situation. Again, all aspects of the rule make perfect sense as far as being fair and simplifying of the game.I just don’t see the problem here. -
There is no way we will beat the Jaguars
Mojo44 replied to Cygnus99's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
A bad take, here. There was much more to the win besides what you state in your post. If you watched the game it is abundantly clear that this is the case. -
Fumble into endzone rule needs to change
Mojo44 replied to Buffalo Barbarian's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I completely agree with all of the posters who state that the rule is fine just the way it is. It is to prevent an intentional fumble forward in the end zone in a desperate situation when a team is trying to score a touchdown. Since it is too much responsibility on the referee to determine whether or not a fumble was intentional the rule stands, simply, as it is. It makes perfect sense and no change is needed. -
Oh, ye of little football knowledge.
-
Is this a playoff team with Tyrod?
Mojo44 replied to Mikie2times's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It wasn’t a playoff team last year with Taylor. This team made the playoffs not because of Taylor, in spite of him!!! When will this narrative ever end that Taylor is anything but a horrid NFL starting quarterback. For all of his negative traits they all add up to one big one: he’s an absolute total 100% loser! I know this isn’t going to stop. But, come on man! -
Would you rather lose next 6 or win next 6?
Mojo44 replied to Bakin's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Allowing for the fact that either scenario is quite unlikely. Also, allowing for the fact that the OP his ****serious, The premises is completely silly. Of course you would want them to win out. If they did, they could, potential he make the playoffs. Even if they didn’t, if they win out that clearly means that the team is clicking on all cylinders. This includes defense and offense. It also means that Allen is evolving into a franchise quarterback. It is also some seriously great momentum going into next season. Who in their right mind would risk all of this for the possibility of a higher draft pick that may or may not work out? These ideas really have to be thought through better before they are posted! -
If McDermott starts Allen tomorrow he should be Fired
Mojo44 replied to Kevin1778's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Anybody who says somebody should be fired should be fired from this board. Silly! -
When I mentioned customary and usual I am referring to the community standard of care. They are the same thing. We agree on that. However, if the anesthesiologist worked under Dr. Andrews in his facility he indeed could be considered negligent for utilizing that anesthesiologist. There are many fingers and they can go in many different directions. Trust me on this.
-
Everyone that wanted TT gone, we told you
Mojo44 replied to Dadonkadonk's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Are usually try to maintain and even keel on my post. Also, I have not read any other post. However, this thread is completely asinine!! Are usually try to keep an even keel on my posts. Also, I have not read any other post on this thread. It’s not necessary. This premise is completely asinine. It boggles my mind that there was any negative out there at all these days that Taylor was anything but horrid!! Everyone, I have to believe, is familiar with is cornucopia of negative traits as a quarterback. Ultimately, they add up to one big negative: Taylor has been, is an always will be a complete loser. He cannot win games. He is Mr. “ three and out.“ Why doesn’t anyone who supports him seem to remember that for the last five games of the regular season he could not lead the team to a fourth quarter TD when they made the playoff run. It was the defense playing it hard out and yes, good coaching, but got us there with a little luck. And, the same thing happened in the playoffs. The defense, again, played it’s heart out. That game was easily winnable with even a smidgen of offense from our completely loser quarterback! Throw in the fact that he is selfish and narcissistic. He actually thinks he’s great and is a true top quality NFL starting quarterback? He would’ve been a horrible mentor to Allen. Getting rid of him was absolutely necessary for this team to MoveOn. I don’t care what’s phappening this year with the offense. It had to be done. Although personally, I think Alan has some significant upside and look forward to washing him develop. In a nutshell, in the whole scheme of things,Taylor sucks 1000%. I know some of you will not heed this advice but, please let it go. I’m getting tired enough about the whining about we didn’t draft Mahomes when we had the chance. Sheesh! -
This can most definitely be a negligence malpractice case even with the patient’s consent. If the negative event that happened is not part of “customary and usual“ risks associated with the procedure the consent could be a non-issue. It doesn’t matter who actually did the nerve block if it was under the supervision and auspice is of Dr. Andrews. However all those involved can be sued. This includes the facility. If negligence can be shown and clearly resulted in and inability for the player to continue his career these are clearly “compensable damages“ that typically the court will see as a Measure with what somebody in his profession would make. Thus, a large award is not out of the question. Malpractice cases are -based, fundamentally, on the following: Negligent behavior has been established which results in compensable damages and the damages are considered “proximately caused“ by the negligent behavior. By the way, I am a doctor, I do treat patients and my community, I am required to have malpractice/liability insurance. My particular specialty is very low risk, thankfully. I have never been sued. However, most doctors will know about these things. And, thus, my post.
-
This is far too rational and makes too much sense for most posters on this board, unfortunately
-
SNF: GB vs. NE at 8:20 PM ET on NBC
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It’s always frustrating to me that the Pats* can seem to take players like Patterson and Gordon and turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse. -
SNF: GB vs. NE at 8:20 PM ET on NBC
Mojo44 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I agree. It can seem that way, at least sometimes.
