moshermw

None - after TT grabbed the lead with that $ TD Run. STFU.

TT threw that: - game winning - in a tight window - to a 4th string WR - where only the Bills WR could get it - to win the game throw .. and ran in the go -ahead TD that no other QB in the league could dream of. But Alas, the GW pass wasn't in the middle of the field. Cut. Him. Now.

He was expressing himself:

Yup. Needs to improve. But just sayin'.

Clay has zero TD's because he's dropped two fo sho TD's. Maybe TT sees a lot more than all you ....

Don't need him this week. It's the Jags at home. Cleveland either. Will def need a 100 % Harvin and 100 % Watkins vs. Pitt and Oakland. Maybe by then their Vajajays will have been magically purged of all sand.

Now #5 in this system: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/sagarin/, with the #5 SOS to date. Only because Sagarin doesn't do it, looked at SOS remaining as well. Bills have the second easiest schedule remaining just behind the Bears: https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/ranking/future-sos-by-other We can do this.

Tyrod says, Gobble Gobble - Beaotches !!

this - why no one sees this is crazy

wow. i give up on you haters. 54 yarder right down the middle in windy conditions vs two missed xp's. crazy. one would think we took a home L.

No. We just have the next higher - as computed - chance to now go 5-1 or 6-0 and make the AFC Wild Card Playoffs. Just joined in 2015 cuz I wanted everyone to know Taylor was available cheap. Huge Bills fan my whole life. Never been a member of a team site so ready to give up on a really good team - most of u are pathetic.

wow.

This is truth Would add Gillislee in relief Special teams were also $. Like better than theirs.

5-5. And the Bills beat every "nerd" site spread with the 4 pt W so expect them to at least remain the best 5-5 prom queen with spooge on their face. Even prettier if/when they go 6-5 after swallowing Jax.

Didn't read whole thread. One of the biggest TT supporters here. Thoughts just on him: - First bad INT thrown as a Bill - Game 10 of 2nd season - but it was game changing bad. - Underestimated Burfect's speed twice and cost 2 3rd down conversions. - Tate missed a catchable game ending 3rd down pass - TT threw a turd to effectively end the game on 3rd to Harvin. Had the Bills lost, I would put the reason for the loss in this order; - Crappy Red Zone playcalling (again) - TT inaccuracy at a key time - Shady "Thumb" Newsflash: Road W.

Thank you.

Given that Seattle is #3, the math liked the near road upset W. Miami and Baltimore are still the two worst losses. Brutal computer or not.

Uphill battle in reality for sure. It's just an objective look at how well the Bills have played compared to other teams. No delusion here at all that the NFL only looks at the 4-5 record. So, every team we play from here on out is below us on this ranking (and others I've looked at, too) so winning out or 6-1 is not as crazy an expectation as one might think.

Know this isn't college where computer rankings can matter as much as record. But one of the most reputable sites that has a system that takes into account who played, beat, score home/away, etc., Buffalo is #7. I see that as an objective reason to be optimistic - including getting healthy at LB and WR as the second half of the season unfolds. Best 5 - loss team: 1 New England Patriots = 26.68 7 2 0 20.16( 15) 3 2 0 | 3 2 0 | 26.99 1 | 26.43 1 | 26.31 1 2 Dallas Cowboys = 25.57 8 1 0 18.50( 29) 2 0 0 | 2 1 0 | 25.24 2 | 25.93 2 | 26.12 2 3 Seattle Seahawks = 24.59 6 2 1 20.43( 10) 3 0 1 | 3 0 1 | 24.35 3 | 25.04 3 | 24.96 3 4 Denver Broncos = 24.23 7 3 0 20.01( 17) 0 1 0 | 2 3 0 | 24.26 4 | 24.20 5 | 24.18 5 5 Kansas City Chiefs = 23.90 7 2 0 19.63( 22) 0 1 0 | 3 1 0 | 23.53 7 | 24.41 4 | 24.49 4 6 Philadelphia Eagles = 23.24 5 4 0 20.00( 18) 2 1 0 | 3 2 0 | 23.92 5 | 22.29 9 | 22.43 8 7 Buffalo Bills = 22.92 4 5 0 21.23( 6) 2 2 0 | 2 3 0 | 23.65 6 | 22.08 11 | 22.06 10 8 Arizona Cardinals = 22.77 4 4 1 18.36( 30) 0 2 1 | 0 3 1 | 23.48 8 | 22.12 10 | 21.91 11 9 Atlanta Falcons = 22.61 6 4 0 21.48( 1) 1 2 0 | 3 3 0 | 22.67 10 | 22.39 8 | 22.53 7 10 Pittsburgh Steelers = 22.53 4 5 0 21.40( 3) 1 3 0 | 1 4 0 | 22.69 9 | 22.54 7 | 22.29 9 http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/sagarin/

Seattle - one D play away Ravens - one O play away Jets - one D play away Legit 3 plays away from 7-2. 2 on the D, one on the O. That's how I see it. Make those plays and 10-6 is completely doable.

Agree. Baltimore was loaded at QB without the fans really knowing or appreciating it. Crappy Karma that the season TT bails after his rookie contract was over, the injury bug hit Joe. Tough situation all the way around for Joe and Ravens fans. Bills are the benefactor...

Lol at "Seattle Tyrod". He did look more accurate and decisive I guess. I'd go with "Seattle Skill Players" tho.

Dude was absolute $ on Monday Night. See: offensive records set against the Seagulls by this O. Bills win it easily behind him without the D being basically air in the 1st half. Giddy to see what he does after 2 weeks without game punishment and getting reacquainted with Percy Harvin and the rest of the healing up WR corps and Shady. Still feel like all those athletes - including TT - on the same page can't be stopped.

Was well known in Baltimore that in scrimmages "Team Tyrod" - mostly the # 2 O players regularly beat "Team Flacco" - the #1's. That's why Kubiack (Ravens OC in TT's last season) offered TT twice as much as Buffalo to be Manning's backup in Denver. As has been posted here, TT turned it down to take a chance on himself to be a starter. It's his agent's job and living to negotiate the best deal for TT going forward but I believe that the person TT doesn't give a crap about money at this stage of his career. Aside from Flacco's durability during those 4 seasons, it's also the reason TT never got a start and only 35 pass attempts in over 65 games. Flacco and his agent didn't want the fans or the NFL world to see how good TT was. Numbers in a very thorough study as posted by the OP bear that out.

Great work. Thanks for your impartial summary of TT and everyone else's performance.