Billsfan1972

I see a whole lot with more Ints. then Allen. I guess their's however were not "Turnover Worthy"? https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player/_/table/passing/sort/interceptions/dir/desc I can also think 2 right off the top Diggs (who ran the wrong route) and Isaiah McKenzie vs. Tenn (off his chest) that weren't Josh's fault. Sure there were others. Shall we check Fumbles too? https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/fumbles Very quick Wilson, Goff, Jackson, Cousins, Brady & Murray are all ahead of Allen..... Where are they on the list????🙄

They do..... Mahomes, Rodgers & Wilson would get full points for that throw. Mahomes & Rodgers as said earlier probably are 1-2 (with Allen) in making these "Turnover Worthy Plays" and I will bet are not marked that way.

How about then "Garbage Time Prevent Allowance or GTPA" to adjust Tannehill's #'s vs. Cleveland down 38-7?😉

Which would then put Mahomes & Rodgers as 1-2..... The amount of passes Mahomes throws that seem ill advised (like Rodgers) are often what sets them apart. Like Allen's pass to Davis vs. SF, that certainly would have been graded a Turnover-worthy Play for Allen, but Full points for Mahomes, Rodger & probably Mayfield, Stafford & Tannehill.

How long were you waiting to post that troll???? I read 4 pages and most laughing about the absurdity of PFF and so I checked (and posted) QBR's for two above him, which were not in any earlier post, but I want attention? Hello mirror....

And Stafford's QBR was 85.5% (Rtg 109.4).... He came back & won. Good for him. Tannehill 82.3% (104.8) Allen can't compete.

No open from the second he drops back, however the design was left/middle all the way. Maybe though will be available later in the year. I did have someone say the same in the thread I started on the 5 bast passes too. The joke was in 2018-19 people would have questioned what a bad decision Allen made on the play.😉

Not for a second..... But the idea of another Sb for Brady & Gronk is maybe an even worse scenario.

But Smith was open for an easy TD (at least 25+ gain)......😜

Just saying, I know when I get too excited, usually a dose of humility follows......😉 Seen that here too when all the threads are gushing in platitudes. Yes this is tongue in cheek for those who may not get it....... Let me start...... Hope McD continues to be aggressive vs Pitt & doesn't decide this game should be played like last year vs. them or NE this year..... Keep Josh throwing & 300+ (yes Oldmanfan)......😜

That was #1 on my list🤩 (which was not in order, just off the top of my head), with the next play another 40 yard pass in the air where ellen was drifting and didn't even step into it. What arm strength. Just a wee???? He is learning to sell them as there have been a # not called in the past, because he is just too damn big & strong.

I just saw that..... Would have been too easy a TD, but wow was he open. Some plays certain players are not in the play or really part of the route.

Yes I thought about that one too... Make it 6 throws!!!!!😉

With lower yards, % completions, avg/attempt an Int & a fumble (not lost). Pretty much says that QBR maybe right up there with PFF's rating system in making no sense whatsoever....

As said Allen is much improved reading the D, so chalk that one up, but any Qb could have made those throws. The 5 I pointed out were really special (in a game where there were a #). Sucked that his QBR was only 75.2%😜

And no neither the Davis or McKenzie one's were any big deal. Right call, right read & easy TD's. 1. Allen flushed out and on the run to Diggs for 14 yards on the sidelines (near the end of the first quarter). How he threw it right there and the toe tap, just wow. 2. Allen to Beasley same thing near the half and right at the sidelines. 3. Beasley TD a five yard dart (actually there were a few) 4. Davis for 18-20 yards over the middle. A laser over the LB and into coverage. Wow what a pass. 5. Beasley for 39 yards (right after #1), Allen rolling, buying time, Beasley comes across the field and Allen effortlessly throws it 40 yards on a rope. These were out of this world plays and all right on the money.

It's just no fun throwing for 300 vs. knowing each and every game (unless McD get's scared of the opponent i.e. NE or Pitt or the elements) that 300 is in play vs. 2017-19, just ask the experts here..... Most telling backhanded comment yesterday was the crew saying Beane & McD came to the realization you can't win averaging <20/game....😋

If they were 7 or 8-0 then yes it would have been different. I just don't think they deserved to be 12-0 and have been wanting to see them lose for weeks. If they did beat the Bills and were 13-0 then 16-0 is just too close and there was just something that really irked me. Now it is two very good teams playing as opposed to one unbeaten one. Yes the subtle difference maybe too hard for Teef to grasp.....

There were 5 plays that stood out...... The Davis & MacKenzie Td's don't even register. That pass to Beasley on the sidlines above, another to Diggs on the sidelines that all were sure was OB, that 40 yard bullet to Beasley he just flicked his arm, the Beasley TD, and the pass to Davis on a rope over the LB on a rope..... Others were just the right read and making the play.

It was all about that first down play. McD called a run & if it hadn't gained 8 yards, I imagine the Bills would have gone conservative.

Can't help yourself..... Maybe if I mention Allen and the Offense you can really start in on this thread too.

Simply I did not want 16-0 in play and the Steelers 12-0 and every team (proverbially) gunning for them. I want the Bills to win Mano a Mano with nothing extra on the line. To me the storyline will be Pitt bouncing back this week after two topsy-turvy weeks (and schedule changes affecting them) and showing they are SB co-favorites (with KC).

How about ranked 30th, 29th & 24th in Offense the past 3 years? Is that only something TSW fans are proud of & okay with? 300 does matter..... Again when both QB's throw for 300, usually pretty important that the winning team's QB di that..... If you want to argue that it is not important when only the losin g QB threw for 300, maybe there is an argument.

Maybe I just dislike Pitt so much and think they were as bad an 11-0 team as I there was, feeding off an easy schedule and things just going their way. I want them to lose every week, so that's my bias. I did not want Buffalo to be the one to break the streak in week 14. I want Buffalo to beat them when there is no added incentive (outside playoff seeding & home field). JMHO.

Great review...... Agree with all, but the Defense while they made plays and stands, they were overall good not spectacular and gave up # of yards. SF is not a great team on offense and decimated as all know by injury.