Jump to content

Perry Turtle

Community Member
  • Posts

    910
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Perry Turtle

  1. 1 hour ago, Gugny said:

     

    I don't think anyone (no sane, normal person) expects a quarterback to be better because he's black.

     

    But I do think that every black quarterback has people who hate them because they're black.

     

    Have you ever heard someone say, "well, he's black, so I expect him to be better." ??

     

    This is what pissed me off about his comments.  He was saying that people think he and other black QBs should be better because they're black.  That is absolutely stupid to me.  And it unnecessarily injects race into a conversation about the ability to play QB in the NFL.

     

    I don't think he's saying that.

     

    Instead of considering Taylor, consider that Mitch Trubisky was drafted before Deshaun Watson.

     

    From a football perspective, that makes absolutely no sense.  Watson was the better college player and had the vastly better college career.

     

    But there were whispers before the draft that Watson was inaccurate, that he was a product of a system, that he couldn't complete NFL throws.

     

    So the Bears selected a QB in the draft who started 12 games on a middling program over a guy who ripped apart Alabama in the National Championship game.

     

    Maybe the Bears had legit reasons for making the choice of Trubisky over Watson (like straight-up incompetence), but to those who play the game, this decision is baffling.

     

    Was race a factor? Who knows, but from the perspective of a black QB, you have to wonder what more Deshaun Watson had to do to prove to the Bears that he was a better choice  than Trubisky.

     

    I think that's what Taylor's quote was driving at.  That there seems to sometimes be an extra hurdle that black QBs have to clear to earn their place in the NFL.

     

    Was that hurdle there for Taylor? Probably not, he is a QB with limited skills.

     

    Was that hurdle there for Watson? Eh, I don't know, but Trubisky over Watson is an extremely difficult football argument to make.

     

  2. 15 minutes ago, row_33 said:

     

    fair enough

     

    can't see him walking away from it, he seems to enjoy this too much, he only has to exert himself for 3 playoff games every season

     

     

    What else does Brady do? He's got a beautiful wife and family, sure, but you don't hear him get all Kyle-Williams-like claiming he wants to spend more time watching his kids grow up.

     

    His wife is busy with her own career, so you don't hear her saying she wants him around more.

     

    He has no other known hobbies, hell he probably doesn't even pick out his own clothes.  He's as dull as rocks (quick, tell your favorite Tom Brady non-football related story -- too late, there are none).

     

    He'll keep playing until defenses finally realize that they need to blanket his receivers off the line, and force him to use his aging arm to get the ball further down the field.

     

    So, in other words, he's never going to retire.

  3. Seen this story too many times.  A-holes beating up morons.  

     

    The Patriots, a team with absolutely no personality playing teams with no clue how to stop a middle aged WR (who looks like he smokes at halftime and lives under a bridge) from taking an inside release.

     

    Tom Brady we all know loves football and has a beautiful family and a creepy life coach and eats a meow-mix diet, but that's all we know because he's said nothing remotely interesting ever during his illustrious football career.

     

    And Bill Belichick, can't wait for his HOF acceptance speach.  It should run about 35 seconds and be as inspirational as a McDonalds manager pre-shift pep talk ('ok kids, let's do your job today!')

     

    And the Rams, with all their young players and innovative coaches are going to just get chewed up.  Wade Phillips isn't going to listen to Tony Romo, who called every one of NE's plays on the game winning drive.

     

    No, like every other DC NE has faced, Wade is going to come up with some type of free-style zone defense that will let tiny little white receivers run with abandon across the middle of the field, like fleas on a fat dog's belly.

     

    And at some point, the Rams will stop the Patriots on offense, and you'll let yourself believe that maybe the fun and chaos are finally coming back to the game.  That players with skill AND personality will make the game interesting again.  That you can watch a game between two non-Bills teams and not feel the need to commit hari-kari if the wrong team wins.  

     

    But, no, FLAG.  Refs call Suh for roughing-the-Brady and Eddleman catches yet another middle seam pass for another TD.

     

    So I'm watching for sure, but more for scientific reasons.  I want to be there to see the NFL finally, permenently calicfy into the No Fun League. 

     

    Oh, and cheese dip.  The SB cheese dip is also good.

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 42 minutes ago, MJS said:

    It goes both ways. Ask Drew Brees if he would have liked a defensive coach to fix their terrible defense a few years ago.

     

    Turnover on the defensive side of the ball can also take it's toll.

    Are you implying that Drew Brees would want Sean Payton replaced by a defensive-minded coach?  Because I seriously doubt that would be true. 

     

    The offensive-minded coach trend is heavily influenced by the rule changes over the last decade that have favored the passing game. Teams realize that offensive-minded coaches are better able to take advantage of those changes than defensive-minded coaches.

     

     

  5. The whole UCF argument is about the power 5 conferences trying keep their grip on the obscene amount of money college football generates.

     

    UCF had a better claim to a seat at the playoff table last season when they kicked Auburn's ass in the Sugar Bowl after Auburn throttled Alabama (I know, I know, SEC hacks, Auburn wasn't trying it hardest).  Memphis and USF also had better seasons last year.  UCF also had it's starting QB all season.

     

    This season, Milton's injury hurts their Bowl chances, but ragging on UCFs schedule is pretty ridiculous when Alabama scheduled Citadel the week before Auburn this year.

     

    College football needs to expand its playoffs to 16 teams.  The Bowl season has become a joke and needs to have some games with some meaning injected into the schedule.  

     

    Teams like UCF who built a solid program deserve to be able to compete for the rewards of exposure.

     

    Or maybe people are happy with watching some combination of Alabama/ Clemson/ Notre Dame/ Georgia/ Oklahoma/ Ohio State play in the playoffs every year, augmented by abominations like the Cheez It bowl.

     

     

  6. 56 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

     

    You will need to remember that there is no superstar WR available in free agency this year waiting for Beane to throw money at him... 

     

    Upgrading WR position will be done via a combination of bringing in a mid level prospect in Free Agency and perhaps rolling the dice on someone in the first or second round ..

     

    Getting a big name WR via trade ( Green or Jones for example) is unlikely to happen as Beane won’t give up the assets required.. the guy that said giving up a 4th for Green must be having a laugh...

     

    Free Agency prospects look a little better for OL, but it’s a sellers market and realistically they can probably expect 1 big name and 1 medium name at best to come here given the number of teams looking to acquire talent..

     

     

    That's fine for WR, as long as the position is improved.

     

    However, if Beane is not a player in FA this year, after gutting the roster for two years to reclaim cap space, fans should rightly be ticked off.

     

    The Beane/McDermott narrative has been that the dead cap space has restricted the team from being fully competitive the last two seasons.  If the story now changes to there is no one worth signing, despite $90 million in cap space, well that would highlight some pretty horrible planning on the part of the front office.

  7. 6 minutes ago, TPS said:

    As Daboll has stated, they game plan each week based on the weaknesses of the opponent they face. The offense has to be multi-dimensional to stretch the field both vertically and horizontally, which requires all "types" of WRs, TEs, and RBs.  Between Foster's deep threat and Allen's legs, I think the 15-20 yard midfield throws will be their bread and butter, and what matters there are guys who know how to find the soft spots in the zone.  McKenzie and Zay should both work good there.  They will definitely need another deep threat in addition to Foster, and it would certainly be great to have a young stud who is a multi-dimensional threat for Allen as well. I don't think they need to spend their R1 pick on finding him though...

    Yeah, and Rex had the same type of strategy on defense and it was a freakin disaster.

     

    They can either waste time trying to force their franchise QB to be something he's not, or they can build an offense around his strengths.

     

    Who would rather pair Allen with, OBJ or Julian Edelman? OBJ is a much better fit than Edelman for Allen's strengths.

     

    If Beane wanted a WR corps of #2s and #3s, he should have drafted Josh Rosen.

     

    I'm glad they drafted Allen.  I like him much better than Rosen, but he's not a 3 step drop QB.  He's more like Ben Roethlisberger than Tom Brady, and the Steelers are always looking for high-end WRs. 

  8. If Beane's plan is to trade away draft picks for middle-of-the road talent, I say that Pegula should just fire him now.

     

    The $90 million in cap space has gotten so much play this year that if it were a person, it would be the fans second-favorite player (Josh Allen first, $90 million cap space second).

     

    Beane gutted so much talent from the roster to create that space that he better use it to build a winning team, instead of relying on Kelvin-Benjamin-type trades.

     

    Take away the names, and the fact is that Beane traded a 3rd and 4th pick overall, creating dead money and holes in the roster that contributed to the team's shortcomings the last two season.

     

    This year there better be a payoff for those moves, and they need to be better than a Trent Murphy level FA signing.

    • Like (+1) 1
  9. The problem isn't choosing to go for it on 4th.

     

    The problem is choosing a play where the fullback is split out wide causing an empty set.

     

    That is basically playing 10 men against 11 on 4th and short, since the Lions know there is no chance the ball is going out wide.

     

    Line the full back behind the QB, and the Lions have to ar least account for him on a fake.

     

     

  10. 3 minutes ago, dubs said:

    He’s not perfect but name a coach who is. IMO he’s done a very good job through a difficult rebuild. 

     

    He will continue to improve. 

     

    Im convinced that many fans subconsciously believe that they can coach or manage a team better than actual professionals because it’s not dependent on physical talent like players. 

    And yet 1/3 of those professionals are fired from their coaching positions every year.  Wonder why that is?

  11. More than okay with the way that Allen played, especially as a rookie QB.  The problems with the Oline, RB, TE, and WR positions are all well-known, and hopefully will be addressed in the off-season.

     

    This loss, however, is not acceptable due to the way the defense played.  This is the second week in a row, the defense has given up the go-ahead TD in the 2nd half against beatable opponents.  Their play in the red zone all season has been terrible.  And unlike the offense, the team has invested heavily in the defense.

     

    McDemott and Frazier have to prove that they are able to shut teams down late in the game, especially when those teams have rookie QBs.

     

    As for the draft, this isn't the NBA or NHL.  Good players will be available throughout the first round.  I'd rather gain the confidence that the team is being coached by better-than-mediocre coaches than gain a couple of spots in the draft.

     

     

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  12. No doubt the Bills needed to blitz more, but where was McDermott in this game?  Two weeks in a row the defense has given up a game-winning TD in the 4th quarter. 

     

    The team has invested heavily in the defense the last two seasons.  They have a DC with a ton of NFL experience, and they have a defensive-minded head coach.  But they can't protect a lead against a rookie QB at home?

     

    We all know that the Bills do not have an NFL caliber O-line, and that their RBs all have AARP cards, and that the WRs can't separate or catch, but the defense should be able to be the difference in a close game.

     

     

  13. 2 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

    Ya know another poster just pointed this out and I think it's a fantastic point:

     

    Allen threw that football 70 yardsin the air, and he did that AFTER running all over the field to find a throw.

     

    And yeah, it was about 70 yards... maybe 66 to be exact.

     

    Ball released on the 40 yard line reaches the end zone but he's throwing across the field.

     

    Look up the dimensions of a football field for yourself and you'll discover the distance horizontally from where Allen threw it to where Clay couldn't catch it was somewhere around 23-26 yards I'd say.

     

    40+23/26= 63/66 yards.

     

    Clay should have come back to the ball a bit.

    Between the scramble and pass, Allen covered around 100 yards of field on that play.

     

    And they were all necessary as the receivers all seemed to be running hail-Mary routes to the right side of the end zone.

     

    It's difficult to call this a horrible pass, and Allen did throw some horrible passes in this game, when 95% of QBs are not able to make that play.

      

  14. I don't know, that pass went 40 yards from the left numbers to the right numbers, after a necessary 40 yard scramble, thrown away from his body.  It hit the hands of the receiver.

     

    Considering all that, I have a hard time calling that pass, which most NFL QBs couldn't come close to completing, a bad pass.

     

    The real question should be, with the Bills needing 11 yards for a first down, and more than enough time on the clock, why was a play called where all the receivers ended up in the end zone? 

     

    Daboll called a hail mary when he didn't need to. 

  15. It's pretty standard to try to get in field goal position with a minute left in the half when your starting beyond your own 25 yardline.  The Bills weren't backed up on near go line.  Most teams would try a few chunk plays to get 40 yards or so to get into range.

     

    On the  broadcast, Lofton was talking about sitting on the ball because it was too far to go for the TD.  Couldn't figure out why he was ignoring the FG, especially since the Bill's were getting the ball first in the 2nd half.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...