TheWei44

If you put a couple Pop Tarts in the toaster, it is ill-advised to use your bare hands (fingers) to take them out. Trust me!!

My invite must have gotten lost in the mail . . . Maybe another time?!

Hard to say between DE and DT (up the middle is key, but also have great talent on the edge) - I'll go with Oliver (with Floyd and Bernard not far behind).

This is such a tough one to predict. I'm going with Bills 34 Phish 27 (with some of the 27 coming in quasi-garbage time in the 4th).

You sound like a decent-enough chap (lady?) - Thanks for your posts and may the better team win on Sunday!! Cheers.

I said yesterday it's like having two Milano's - Never would have expected that!

Bills 31 C-ders 23

Josh also threw it away once or twice - I was very happy to see that as well. Might have been his most patient, deliberate game to date.

And yet Burrow is misspelled with reckless abandon!

I'll keep it simple: A win, no serious injuries, and Allen playing well.

Great work on this, Beck!! Thanks!! Not sure if already mentioned, but I'd be curious to see how this table would look including rushing TDs and rushing yards. It's incomplete in the sense that running has been a huge part of his game (for better or worse).

And too much on the field "drama" too (Rodgers out, Allen's issues, circus catch, special teams' score in OT)!!

Bills 27 Raiders 20 - A solid win but not a blowout. Kincaid more involved, less Cook runs "up the middle", Floyd has another big game.

Josh was the main reason we lost but not the only reason (some bad play calls, etc. sprinkled in). His play in the 2nd half was atrocious. There were some silver linings, though. Floyd looked excellent, Kincaid caught the few balls thrown his way, Diggs had a big game, and the offensive line did reasonably well against a tough DL. Milano's a stud. On the negative side, besides Josh's play, Cook is NOT an every down back, nor is he an "up the middle" back especially against the Jets. Cook had a good game except when he was tasked to run right into the teeth of the DL. And even given how poorly Josh played and the other issues, that was a miraculous TD catch. Props to the Jets but it's a pyrrhic win for them given the Rodgers injury. Go Bills! And Josh, please revert to how you played the first half of last year (and more or less, how you played the first half yesterday evening)!!

I was living in Alexandria, VA full time. Our townhouse a mile or two from the pentagon. Was driving into downtown DC that sunny (Tuesday?) morning. Not a cloud in the sky,

I'll go with Floyd (really hoping he's a difference maker).

It's all about a balanced attack but also not being too predictable - Mix it up, keep em off balance, and definitely take your shots. I expect the Jets to blitz a little more than expected.

Either handoff to Harris for decent yardage but nothing huge or play-action pass (with Harris in backfield) to Kincaid for 8-10 yards.

11-6 seems like a reasonable expectation. But if we beat the Jets comfortably, then I'd revise up to 13-4. Can't wait to get things rolling!

2 from this position list: QB, OL, LB

I will be at the game - Hope there isn't much re the Damar incident (time to move on, it's been addressed enough, hope he continues to do great things off and on the field).

Chiefs Eagles Bengals Bills 49ers Dangerous: Jags, Lions, Dolphins

Depending on how the season goes, they'll be a sweet spot for his return around week 6-8. Right now, it's all speculation but I'd like to see him getting some snaps in the later part of the first half of the season.

You are right on all of this only if Taylor was being extremely precise in his phrasing and with 100% certainty meant to say nothing new in terms of the timeline (in an intentionally ambiguous (perhaps "clever") way). That could be true but it could also be false.

"several weeks from when I said several weeks" is very odd phrasing. Could just as easily mean "no change in timeline" or "double the initial timeline" - Doesn't really clarify anything!