-
Posts
389 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by TheWei44
-
-
Moving to Detroit seems like the most probable move if there is one at all. Fairly neutral location (we don't get the benefit of a home game but arguably could benefit from not having a bad weather/ground£/fluky sort of a game in the elements).
-
32 minutes ago, ChrisWatson#21 said:
Does anyone know what McDermott’s overtime record is?
But also did we lose coins flips in all three of the ones zow2 mentioned, or just 2 of the 3?! That matters too.
-
I'd seriously consider going to the game if it were to move to Detroit (saw Bills/Jets there) - Is this a real possibility?!
-
35 minutes ago, AlfaBill said:
Just a comment on Josh. He played well BUT there were quite a few passes that the receivers had to really stretch and dive for. His passing has been off for 2.5 games now and that includes red zone INTS. I am officially worried about him.
That's a great point that will go largely unnoticed given all the eye-popping crap that happened yesterday. On multiple occasions in the first half, I thought to myself, wow, these receivers are making amazing catches! They were making Josh look better than he was - But, throughout the first half, I was generally thinking the Bills are back to their usual good form on offense.
-
Just now, TheyCallMeAndy said:
I think we see a run heavy game plan and less than 30 pass attempts for Allen.
More runs than usual and more short passes to pass-catching RBs. But there will be some longer passes for balance and the element of surprise!
- 1
-
This is getting ridiculous - We appear to have a super conservative team when it comes to the handling of injuries - If Josh plays, he's viewed as essentially 100% with no risk of injury or "injury" getting worse. NONE of us are privy to the actual results of MRIs, etc. and NONE of us have spoken with the actual team physician(s), and even if someone has, HIPPA likely prevents any discussion of what the physicians know about his health status. There has been speculation all week and we as Bills fans had every reason to be SUPER worried, but the actual data points are what they are and if we see no activation of Barkley, and Josh starting, that fills in all of the blanks for us, by and large.
- 2
-
First offensive play tomorrow: Play-action bomb to Diggs or Davis?! Maybe not though . . .
-
1 minute ago, Bubba Gump said:
Anyone who sprains their elbow, then immediately after, chucks the ball 70 yards is not human.
Elevating Duke prolly just means they are gonna run a lot more.
And that 70-yard pass was apparently the longest over the past 6 seasons!!
- 1
-
I think it's much more likely that Josh starts with Case ready just in case vs. the other way around.
- 2
-
Looks like 538 immediately bumped up the spread and modestly increased the Bills SB chances on this news!!
-
26 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:
If Keenum plays it has to be him. We will have to see if that impact is positive or negative.
Totally agree - And on D, figure it's got to be Miller and/or Milano. Just in Case we need help on D, I'm going with M&Ms . . .
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Nextmanup said:
You know why we are getting hammered with injuries this year? B/C we have had very few the last few years.
It's all random and it was always going to even out with the passage of time.Kind of like "turnover ratio" that thing evens out over time too.
Find the team this year that has the most takeaways, there's my guess for who will have the least next year.
It evens out with time.Agree to an extent. If it's truly random, having a lot of injuries in one year has no impact on injuries in the next year. It's only when you look at 5 or 10 years will you see evidence potentially of a random pattern. Keep in mind the "gambler's fallacy" - Just because the roulette wheel hit black three times in a row doesn't mean red is more likely on the next spin . . . Sorry, the economist in me is coming out a bit here!! All that said, I hope we are nearing the end of this brutal injury bug!! WTF!!
-
9 minutes ago, Beck Water said:
Thanks!
I think you're absolutely correct that better pass defenses play a huge role. Part of that role is, when you're playing a bad team with a poor pass defense, you can get away with some bad decisions and turnovers because you're still gonna get a ton of other opportunities and boatrace the team like we did the Rams and Titans and Steelers. But if the Bills want to be Championship Caliber, then they have to train themselves and play like they're playing a great defense where 1-2 stupid interceptions that take points off the board and give the opponent opportunities, can be the difference between victory and defeat.
What do you mean by "other factors beyond simply being aggressive", especially with regard to the 2 INT vs the Packers and the 2 INT vs the Jets?
It's a valid point that there's a fine line between playing fearless/aggressive and willing to take shots (which we want) vs. being aggressive to the point of reckless.
The two I mentioned are the primary ones, but I do wonder whether there's any truth to the mild concussion rumors from hits he took in both of those games.
-
10 minutes ago, Beck Water said:
This is just me, but I don't think there is anything "sudden" about the refusal here.
I think Josh has been playing aggressive all season.
The thing is, when it works and we score TDs in 3 plays from scrimmage starting at our 2 yard line as in the Steelers game, everyone is ready to canonize Josh. Someone ( @HoofHearted?) said that the Steelers game may have been one of the worst things to happen to Josh. He had 19.7 yds per completion in that game, AND he threw a bad interception to Levi Wallace (the target was Gabe Davis) from the Pitt 21 that took points off the board when the score was 10-7. He threw it on a line as though Wallace were not anywhere near Davis, when in fact Wallace was between Davis and the ball and closing fast - throwing on an arc Davis could have run under would have probably been a touchdown. Same pattern of INT he threw to Knox vs. the Jets.
My guess is that when their young QB throws for 432 yds and the team wins 38-3, Dorsey and McDermott can't read the Riot Act too effectively to Josh over whatever the hell that interception throw was to Davis.
They can say "Josh, you have to take care of the football; Josh, you hurt the team when you take points off the board; Josh, we could have used that touchdown when we were winning only 10-3, it could have changed the game. Josh, you can't do that." and Josh will hear "Josh, football; Josh, points; Josh, touchdown, winning, changed game! Josh, do that!" The media MVP clamor and fan adulation must be louder than the coaches.
There are a few INTs that can't be helped - deflections and such - or the receiver bobbles it and it's charged to the QB (though in those cases, the throw may have been poorly placed or had too much "pepper" on it - I thought for sure that one great catch Singletary made was gonna be deflected and picked).
But I think most of Josh's 8 interceptions have been poor decisions. At least 5 of them.
It's some of what you wrote above for sure, but the recent head scratchers are probably also due to better pass defenses, miscommunication, and other factors beyond simply being aggressive. But you make some interesting, valid points . . .
-
Bills 31 Jets 13
-
How about this nugget too?!
"This [Bills] offense can do anything at any time, and it does it all at a high level. This isn’t just the best offense in the NFL today. It’s one of the most comprehensive attacks this league has ever seen"
- 4
- 3
-
BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE (TALKING HEADS) [with selected bolding of key phrases below]
Ah, watch out
You might get what you're after
Cool babies
Strange but not a stranger
I'm an ordinary guy
Burning down the houseHold tight
Wait 'til the party's over
Hold tight
We're in for nasty weather
There has got to be a way
Burning down the houseHere's your ticket, pack your bags
Time for jumpin' overboard
Transportation is here
Close enough but not too far
Maybe you know where you are
Fightin' fire with fireAh, all wet
Hey, you might need a raincoat
Shakedown
Dreams walking in broad daylight
365 degrees
Burning down the houseAh, it was once upon a place
Sometimes I listen to myself
Gonna come in first place
People on their way to work
And, baby what do you expect?
Gonna burst into flames, ahBurning down the house
My house
Is out of the ordinary
That's right
Don't wannna hurt nobody
Some things sure can sweep me off my feet
Burning down the houseNo visible means of support
And you have not seen nothin' yet
Everything's stuck together
And I don't know what you expect
Staring into the TV set
Fightin' fire with fire, ah- 1
-
1 hour ago, NickelCity said:
Is it likely though? It's the regular season game of the year and a meeting of the best two teams in football, but what are the odds that the one seed comes down to the result of this game?
Totally agree - Huge game that will be over hyped. Important game for wins/conf record/head-to-head but unlikely to, on its own, decide the one seed/HFA.
-
Fantastic win, no doubt. Like that rookies were highly involved, especially numbers 10 and 28. The KC game is going to be super hyped (and it pains me to already see the 13-second stuff replayed a ton!) - In my view, the game while very important and interesting, is unlikely in and of itself to determine home field advantage. And as at least one other poster has said, we just need to win the last game against them!!! GO BILLS - Very nice job of taking care of business today!!
- 1
-
Bills 31, Steelers 13
- 1
-
Just had a chance encounter with Scott Chandler this past Saturday! Randomly met him at the Aspen airport with his wife and four kids! Extremely nice guy (wife was super nice too) who indulged me in a selfie (see attached). I let his son use the bathroom ahead of me on the plane and assisted him with the door and his dad (I didn't know who it was) thanked me on the plane. Then at baggage claim, he thanked me, saw my Bills hat and said he used to play for the Bills. He said he was at KC playoff game and I told him how hard it was for me not to be with my 11 yr old son for that game. Again, super cool guy!
- 10
- 2
- 1
-
I'll be in Aspen (with y'all in spirit!!)
-
Big Turk raises an interesting point (and definitely game within the game sort of issue). I wonder if a lot of it can be chalked up to the idiosyncrasies of the Miami game specifically (lots of subs/injuries/heat) vs a more systemic/long-term "problem"? I noticed, as others have observed too, that some running plays seemed like they were in slow motion/awkward from the snap to handoff. Maybe that too was mostly a Miami-specific thing? But it is fair to assume that we would never intentionally have a running play where we were obviously outnumbered up front.
-
21 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:
Thanks, I'll be in Colorado . . .
- 1
Week 11 Weather: Winter Storm Watch in place for this weekend, potential for major snowfall
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
I'd consider going too - About a 4 hr drive from SW OH for me.