Franco_92

He very obviously gets jacked up in big games against elite teams.

Get of the field you idiots. Don't take any dumb penalties.

Reps. They've spent the last 10 months prioritizing the intermediate routes, where he's one of the best passers in the league. The rep count on deep balls has suffered as a result. They've told us this. It'll be better next season

Allen isn't quite at the level where he can play the game of the last 3 weeks against elite teams. It'll come. But it's ugly right now.

Come on fellas, let's put something together here.

Run-run-deep shot that we've only connected on one time out of 40 all season-punt

Jesus christ offense, get it together

Nice stop. Keep making him throw outside.

Push off by Andrews, ball don't lie.

Bad angle by Tremaine

3rd and 4 going deep is rough

3 and outs not good against this team

I'm just not smart enough to really dissect anything in real time, and in person it's way harder for me to see which subs happen, who's still on the field, and how far any given play has gotten down the field. I get way more info from the tv view. Of course, I'm poor and always sit way up high too which doesn't help things

Boomer Sooner! *I just go here, I don't care much about NCAA FB

Why?

Yup. I love going to games, but money is tight, and honestly, I see more and have a more complete Bills experience when watching on TV compared to being there. If I was less interested in knowing exactly who is on the field and in what formation and how many yards each play gets as it's going on in real time and not waiting for announcements, and more interested in just having a good time and being loud, the games would be preferable, but that aspect of watching live honestly pains me a lot and it's fun to have the tv and be able to see it all

The Ravens are one of four teams with 10 wins, and they've played the other three. They have beaten them all, by a combined 45 points. Bills 30-17

You're thinking of Carpenter there. But otherwise, the situations are eerily similar.

Thank god we lost the Eagles game, otherwise we'd be looking at a clean NFC sweep.

We have 50% more wins than the two other teams combined. What a stupid question

There's a 10-2 NFC team in that 5 seed that is probably going to have to face this 6-7 Cowoys team on the road

Norwood's miss is fundamentally different from those guys - that kick was at the outside of his range at the time, no? missing 47 yarders is fairly common now, much less back then, and so many other issues led to the bills being in that position in the first place. Whereas Bartman is a fan who ***** up an inning, and Buckner's was a play any of us could have made successfully. I certainly can't kick a 47 yarder as easily as I could scoop a grounder and walk to 1st. The Bills don't really have one guy that compares to those ones.

You were referring to the benefit of the Pats getting a home game against the Chiefs. But if that game had been on the road, the TEXANS game would have been at home, which could have been painted just as difficult. This isn't a schedule advantage. They have to face the 1 seed from the two AFC divisions we don't face, two presumably great teams, one at home, one on the road, every season. We do the same, but split them between 2nd, 3rd, or 4th ranked teams in their division. You weren't talking about bye weeks, and are ignoring the fact that there's no way NE would want to waste a bye week before a team they can historically beat in their sleep over one they could actually use preparation for.

You're joking right? The rotation is completely set for all teams indefinitely far into the future. You can figure out the Bills 2035 opponents and where each game is, except for 2 of them, and even then you'd know if those games are home/away

Not really. it's the same formula that sent them to Watson's house, where they pooped their pants two days ago.