cd1

His passes all seem to be VERY catchable....

Your obsession with THE AUTHORITARIAN indicates that you are either very young or very immature. It is like a child saying "but why" after everything you say. Eventually, the adult realizes that it is pointless to respond any further.

For the Bills to be more competitve in keeping up with $$$ the owners share every week. We as fans go the watch an event (football game). It is a product that makes a handful of men wealthy. After every game, each stadium forks over proceeds from ticket sales to a general pot and that money is shared by the team owners. I think club owner gets to keep suite $$$. Buffalo's share of the pot is dwarfed by MANY of the other teams contributions. I am certain Terry is being pressured to find a way to make a LARGER contribution to the pot. The above is a gross generalization. I am sure others will know the exact details. I had the idea that Terry is holding off the other owners with the "we got to win first" notion. Afterall, we are doing great selling tickets to the perenial losers - but those same fans will not want to pay a lot more money for the same old - same old. In a different thread someone remarked that is was such a shame that finally, the Raiders get a QB and start to win and the team moves away on them. Imaging, the BILLS start WINNING. They start getting not just to the wildcard but more... The team moves to a new stadium down the road... After nearly 20 years of waiting, who is going to walk away? Just asking...

Yes, we could have just kept Fitz. He was REAL good at that sort of thing.

BRAVO - BRAVO - bartender, tinfoil hats all around!

Ha - Anyone with a tinfoil hat can tell he is hiding something.

One BIG problem with your theory is - Half of the players in the NFL would not be allowed to cross the border. Many fans for that matter.

Their only blunder was to attempt to reason with the unreasonable.

It is very clear that no amount of debate will sway these knuckleheads from their i'll concieved beliefs. Maybe this is some kind of off shute from Fantasy Football. Now introducing "Fantasy Offseason".

Not for nothing, we already have "A" QB. It is easy geting "A" QB. Finding "THE" QB is much harder and I hope the two of them take enough time (this time) to find "THE" QB and not just "A" QB.

McD: "what the hell have I gotten myself into..."

"Where's Hoodie?"

YES, YES they will. Right now McD is the immortal, all knowing, savior to the dreamers. They want turn every facet of the team (GM) over to him because he is, of course, infalible too. BUT - That is a very high platform to fall from. Unfortunately, coach McD will become HUMAN in the fall and then the winds of discontent will start to blow.

^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^

Thank you, racketmaster!

Ha Ha Ha - You should just change your screen name too "FireEverybody". You have obviously been at this "fire" people thing a very long time.

Zach says "NO THANKS" to the role offered and walks away. It is obvious he feels strongly about NOT PLAYING that ROLE. But somehow (last resort) his new agent convinces him to take the money in B-Lo. Do you REALLY want a guy here who has said publically several times that he does NOT want to play here, to come here just for the money? If he comes back to "negotiate" again, will McD have to promise to play him differently to get him to sign? To me, that is a NO WIN situation for the BILLS. ZB might have talent but he does not want to "spend it here". Either we get a player with a bad attitude or we have a player that pulled a powerplay on the coach.

If you read the statement that the Bills offered enough $$$$ it was NOT about the $$$. Zach walked away from the $$$$ due to the ROLE McD wanted him to play.

SERIOUS QUESTION: If that statement in BOLD above is correct, how could the Bills now justify signing Zach Brown? Scenario - Bills make offer, Zach decides to test the field. Zach hires "new" agent and re-visits Bills. It is reported that the money was there BUT he did not like how Coach McD ws going to use him. Does Coach McD lose authority/power over Zach (and possibly other players) because of having to "bargin" with player? It is one thing to bargin for money BUT a whole nother thing telling a coach where and when you will play. I think that that alone makes Zachs asking price way over the top.

Here is an article regarding Belicheats draft picks: https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1179256-bill-belichick-the-best-and-worst-draft-picks-of-his-patriots-career.amp.html The 10 best and the 10 worst - What? Bill had some stinkers - no, say it ain't so...

Maybe they pick up two QBs in the draft and cut CJ.

Those statements are true. So what you are asserting is that since those statements are true, so is EVERYTHING else LaConjecture writes? Is that what you are saying?

AGREE - it is not like he is smart enough to make this **** up or anything...

OMG - We missed out on Sean Glennon? NOW I really am pissed!

I think you might be on to something right there. I am sure EVERYONE will agree that when the Bills are on offense our silly coaches are sending at least 9 or 10 additional guys out there on the field. Just think of the problems THAT could be causing. Then again, I bet Whaley is making them put all those people out there. He should be FIRED.