I mean....better than throwing an INT.... he had a 1:1 matchup with his TE but it would've been a throw back to his right when he's running left....
I guess you could say just toss it up to the EZ and hope for a TD, touchback, or incomplete.
Fine, but that's simply a choice.
There's been plenty of things to see from the #1 scorring offense and defense these past 4 weeks. When they're something like 9-3 after they're next loss, I assume you'll feel the same way.
The Bills are better prepared than the Ravens. When ***** goes down in January the Ravens are more one-dimensional than any other contender. If the Bills had to travel to Baltimore for a playoff game, I still like the Bills' odds.
Yes they have.
They don't "fall on the wrong side of it far too often" as you said. That's what losing teams do. The Bills literally were in the AFCCG last year.
This is one of the biggest misconceptions, I think.
Great teams do exactly what the Bills have been doing since last year. Beat everyone they're supposed to beat and 50/50 against good teams.
Maybe the ball bounces their way and they end up 75/25 against good teams. Maybe not.
But if they end up 13-4 and lost to some good teams in close games like last night, that's not abnormal or some kind of indication that they're not a real contender. Great teams lose games every year (unless they're the 72 Dolphins or the Cheaters).
Me too. People always said Milano gets some leeway because he makes the splash plays. Well....he made no splash plays last night and sucked.
I think this proves that some people just have a bias against Edmunds, for some reason.
(I'm being purposefully harsh on Milano because that's how people have reacted towards Edmunds. I'm really not that pissed.)
When all is said and done, any team can still become great and stay great. The parity in the NFL is still a positive aspect of the league. In the grand scheme of things, the ref issues are minor.