Jump to content

LeGOATski

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,555
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LeGOATski

  1. There are specific complaints and separate parts to all that. I think the off-field coaching and preparation have been top notch. In game calls obviously lacking in some games, as well as player focus, but there's only so much you can do for that.
  2. They don't play the same position. They're not going to stick Milano into Edmunds' role to have him cover large zones and the intermediate middle. Milano and Edmunds have different roles and they work great together. Another poster brought this up, as if the Bills could just swap them. It doesn't work like that. So, if you want to replace Edmunds, that's fine. He seems to be the odd man out, money-wise. Not role-wise. But to find a player with the same intangibles and abilities, you're going to be looking in the mid-first round again, unless he has some serious question marks/injury. Or if you're looking in FA, then you have to overpay. I think it's most likely that the Bills pay the man they drafted and developed, instead of using valuable resources on someone brand new.
  3. Problem is that the Bills would need to trade up in the 1st to find a comparable player to replace him with.
  4. I met Lionel Dotson in a Walgreens once and he showed me some pass rush moves. Wow, same!
  5. They'll keep the OJ, cut out a 3rd of the O, so it makes a C, and use it for James Cook Ralph is cheap
  6. The stadium is obviously in a bad mood. Let's leave him alone for a bit. Don't need no emo stadium selfies.
  7. I'm sure he'll donate all the money to the charity that helps the animals or whatever. Quit judging him you #######s!
  8. Benford already has more splash plays than Edmunds. Let's blow this ***** up.
  9. It'll depend on who is playing best. If they're all equal, then I think it'll be Tre and Dane as starting corners with the rookies rotating in. Because they're rookies and they didn't originally win the job.
  10. Okay. I really don't care where you want to take it. I was originally replying to a different poster.
  11. If we're using it as a barometer for coaching, I think it's a good reflection on everything that was done in the first 3+ quarters to get the team to that point and win (or lose) the game. A close game is a close game is a close game.
  12. I like the standard of "within 1 score any time in the 4th quarter"
  13. Not to mention watch it in motion. There's no freeze frame in real life.
  14. It was awesome watching the replay of that on the Manning Cast. What a tool.
  15. Damn, I thought he went down on purpose in order to drain clock, but he was really just securing the ball.
  16. It's gonna be the Bills. They reward their own.
  17. The Cardinals are a crappy org. A guy with his talent may just need a change of scenery. Could be worth it. Side note, the 2nd rounder they used to draft Isabella was they one they got in the trade of Josh Rosen. Just one failure to another.
  18. I think they should totally play Mitch. Probably their best chance
×
×
  • Create New...