LeGOATski

He has to be the focus of the passing game. He's a first round pick. If he has the same amount of receptions as last year and third in yards, I'm disappointed.

I wanna say Kincaid had a similar statistical trend. I expect one of these guys to go over 1000, which isn't that hard to do in today's NFL.

To each their own, I guess.

You're being very dramatic. Like the Anxiety character from Inside Out 2.

If you're only watching baby movies, that might be the problem

Did you like Civil War? Inside Out 2? Monkey Man? Night Swim? Challengers?

The man wants to watch a remake. You've demonstrated my point. None of that long-winded scenario explains a lack of creativity in Hollywood.

Egad!

It's a mix, but the guys projected to get most of the targets (Kincaid, Shakir, Coleman) are definitely inexperienced.

That was my very first thought as well. I assume there are going to be some struggles on the backend of the D, which means the O might have to compensate with long, successful drives. Next big question mark is Brady and this receiving corps.

Doubt it if you didn't like Dune 1

Stopped reading at the 2nd paragraph because it sounds like you're arguing in favor of this WR corps now. Samuel is a 1000 total yard weapon under Brady, but he's going to have a tough time competing for targets with the likes of Coleman, Shakir, MVS, and Knox.... Woah .... I guess this receiving room really HAS gotten MUCH better! I'm not sure you understand Samuel's role anyway.

When I was a kid in the 90s just starting to get into football, I loved Lofton. I knew who he was before I knew who Andre Reed was because I collected cards and was more focused on the stats.

I stopped at super hero movies. It's your choice what movies you watch. Just come out from under that rock. I also love books, though. False. They do both: completely sell out and also are super creative.

He was great that year. Over 1000 yards receiving with Brady at OC. Which represents my point. And Samuel over 1000 yards from scrimmage with Brady at OC. Samuel with Brady is an upgrade over Davis. For as crappy as you think both these guys are, they both have better career catch rates than Davis.

I can't exactly. The same question was posed earlier about them and I supposed, after the 6-6 start, that they wanted to throw the ol' curveball at defenses who were expecting the balls to continue going Diggs' and Davis' way. The offense switched focus to Kincaid, Cook, and Shakir with success. I wonder if they already felt like they were moving on from Diggs and Davis at that point.

You engaged me first. I didn't argue. I simply ignored your questions about Samuel's target numbers because they were irrelevant to my discussion. And you didn't know who Robbie Anderson was, so I educated you on that.

He's another Manning type to me. Funny and down to earth, but also doesn't mind the spotlight. Mahomes is more of a bro. Kinda douchey

James Lofton, a burner with great hands and ironman toughness/durability, would be perfect for Allen and this offense.

That simply means us, the consumers, are increasingly willing to pay for remakes. Explain how that means there's a lack of creativity.

I didn't, I just don't really care about your point

He's a 4.3 guy

You don't think Ridley Scott wanted to continue the story? He also continued with Alien. Not sure what this has to do with Hollywood's creativity. Scott does whatever he wants at this point in his career. To your point though, there are very creative and original films coming out constantly, so I never understand this narrative. And then even if you consider remakes like Dune to be not creative, it's still an awesome movie. Lack fo creativity in Hollywood is such a weird complaint that people parrot.

No one did 87.... TBD favorite Andy Isabella Now on to 83...

Robbie Anderson changed his name to Chosen. Worth mentioning that, like Samuel, Anderson had his best year under Joe Brady. Further evidence that getting the most out of his WRs is kind of Brady's forte. That bodes well for Coleman and the rest of these guys.