LeGOATski

Football is 8 or 9 games out of the year. Not like baseball, basketball, hockey... And we're talking about a huge capacity/cost football facility compared to a relatively small capacity/cost hockey facility. The cost/benefit is not comparable. It's apples and oranges. I'm sure the Bills would love to build a wonderful 20k seat, $250 mil multi-use facility in downtown Buffalo...you know...if that was the reality of the NFL. But it's not. That's hockey. Two different worlds.

No, Von Miller is our Randy Moss

Better yet, there are three!!! Good things come in threes.

Let's all relish in another human being's despair

People are what push a city to a new level. A football team and stadium doesn't bring in a mass influx of people.

I count 30 rows l, but that's just a rendering. RWS currently has 38 rows in the lower bowl? We should expect less rows in the new stadium based on the details so far and what their stated intentions are.

I doubt it. People would still be complaining that it's only 65%

I forgot to bring a gift

Yeah, that lower bowl is not nearly as big. That whole stadium looks like the Bills mid-upper sections. However, Tottenham is the same size. 62K+ I think, and they managed to "cover" it all. The Bills should be able to do the same. Not sure what the issue is, but it must be structural or cost, or both.

A heptagonal prism seems like a no-brainer now. They done ***** up. I'm sure they will, but they could go a little further to make it unique.

Some art deco detail, if done right, could be very cool and representative of Buffalo architecture. The rendering already features a brick facade and some details reminiscent of buildings like Buffalo City Hall would fit in nicely.

I would think so, too. If structural soundness is in question, how much more would it be to have an extra overhang that can slide out? Would be a cool feature. If it's gonna snow, leave it in. If it's nice weather or just rain, slide it out for extra coverage. Based on the 65% comments though, it seems to be not in the conversation at this point. Probably too much extra money and not worth it.

It "covers" everything but the lower bowl. And "cover" is a loose term for many of those seats. If you draw a line straight down from the overhang and consider anything on the outside of that line as "covered" then yeah, I see 65%. Lower bowl is 35%, I guess that seems right.

He's made some good plays; he's made some bad plays... I'm this offense, we shouldn't be surprised to have top 10 production from all three receivers. McKenzie with slot receptions and TDs. Diggs in yards, targets and TDs Davis in yards/reception and TDs (dude is #1 deep ball WR) TDs, TDs, TDs!!!

There seem to be a good number of Cali QBs I found this interesting: https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/31217643/where-do-nfl-quarterbacks-come-best-worst-states-how-changed I think Josh will obviously be giving California a boost over the coming years.

He's a Brady fan, for sure. I think he's just a fan of the player.

It's almost two years old. I like it too, and it may have been an early idea, but I think they wanted the stadium fully enclosed on the sides to reduce wind/elements. We can see they got rid of the huge gap on the end. The overhang looks sleek on that one, but I don't like how it's up on stilts with the metal structure exposed underneath. Looks outdated and clashes with the rest of the sleek design

How does it look like Tottenham exactly? Because it's got transparent panels? It's oval shaped? It's open air? These are features that are going to look similar on their own. Doesn't mean they're just copy-pasting. This is Tottenham This is the Buffalo rendering Anyways, they chose these architects for a reason and were using other stadiums like Tottenham for inspiration. Of course we're going to get similar results. And that's not a bad thing. That's an old image that been shared so many times.

At that point they're both making a play on the ball. I would hope it doesn't get called, but I think the hand to the face is what did it.

Weak call. If he doesn't hit the receiver in the face/grab the face mask, does it still get called?

Expectations vs reality.

Imagine Bills fans if it was Edmunds in those highlights instead of Devin White. I have no idea, but I think that could be the reference

There's a trend right now of activists throwing food at famous paintings

Brady freaking out. Lol

@Scott7975 not happy with that back end zone TD throw