PlayoffsPlease

Rosen has great pocket presence. He just stands in their and fires, unlike Allen who breaks from the pocket and runs for first downs.

So you are saying that Anderson could have explained why he laughing, but instead acted like a complete dick on being asked a simple question.

Yes, and he could have just said that to the reporter. Instead he acted like a petulant child with his hand caught in the cookie jar, and tried to act like it was someone else's fault. I am not sure why it needed to be reposted. On the other hand what difference does it make?

who is the goodberry and why is he so wise?

Its was not fire. It was personal embarrassment on being called out for clowning around during a losing effort. Anger is not fire.

Or instead of acting like a douche, he could have answered the question, like a proper professional.

So you want players to lie? He was clearly laughing on the bench in Q4 in a losing effort. His reaction is phony. He was just pissed because he did not realize he would not be called out on it. Personally I don't want players who are yucking it up on the bench the Bills are losing or doing a frigging sack dance or end zone celebration when the team is down by three touch downs late in the game. Clowns belong in a circus.

It is hard to imagine being worse than Peterman. I will grant you that. But this is the Bills. And anything is possible.

Prior to bringing in the lazy experienced boob to instruct you, the young wunderkind, had your organization hired a series of coaches including a specialized Jeetz coach whose focus was to develop you? Can you imagine a coaching room where McDermott, Daboll and David Culley (25 years of coaching experinence) are sitting around saying "I don't know how the hell to get a rookie ready for a game. I think we need a scrub like Derek Anderson. Maybe he can teach us all. " 90% plus of Anderson's experience is in how to prepare to be the backup who is not expected to play. His experience applies much better to Nate Peterman. Heck if you combine a Anderson's experience with Peterman's well of adversity he has accumulated and mix in a little McBeane culture we might be able to develop the best QB ever whose sole job is to ride the pine. Andersons value to the team is to be better than Peterman. No one will know until Sunday if that is the case.

Look how changing coaches ruined the Rams. Or the Eagles. They should definitely stuck with Fisher and Chip Kelly. This is one of the biggest points of confusion among fans that don't understand things. In the last thirty years coaches are retained for long tenures because they win. It does not work in the other direction that teams win because coaches are retained for a long time. Coaching is like any position on the field. If there is a chance to improve you can. Are you mad at McDermott for changing OC's . Should Pegula lecture him on the importance of continuity in coaching? Should McDermott keep Daboll for years, even if he thinks he is inept?

You would be correct

From the Colts website https://www.colts.com/news/the-man-behind-the-captandrewluck-account-is-andrew-luck

Anderson was renowned for having a very low Wonderlic score a 19. It seems hard to believe that someone who had an undistinguished playing career and tests poorly for intelligence is the ideal "mentor".

It was recently reported, Captain Andrew Luck is the actual Andrew Luck.

You must be fun at parties.

You can't explain that to the people who learned about climate change in political science class.

and the tears flowed

still starting

Says a guy who roots for the team that is starting Derek Anderson this week.

A normal team coming off a playoff season would have kept Taylor, drafted Allen, and cut Peterman. But that is not very Billsy,

It is also possible, that Allen's first read gets open far less often than any other QBs first read in the NFL. I am not claiming this is the case. But given my perception that the receivers are truly awful, it seems possible.

How about this. Your analysis of Josh Allen seems wrong in almost every regard. You have developed a personal opinion (which is your right) and that personal opinion destroys all objectivity regarding his performance, which in turn destroys your credibility. Hope that clears things up for you.

You should consider asking the Bills to give you a tryout as a QB or QB coach.

Do you not understand what the word "rookie" means?

I am willing to venture a guess that Allen's receivers have had more drops too. On the other hand ESPN's possibly dubious QBR rating, which tries to account for some of the factors you mention, does put Allen behind the other QBs at this point.