Jump to content

BringBackOrton

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,954
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BringBackOrton

  1. Matthews was widely regarded as a more productive and better player on this board at the time of this trade.
  2. Jordan Matthews had 2 injuries that hampered him in 2016. Including a knee; the same thing that put him on IR this year. The larger point being that all players get unlucky and get injured. We had debates here all the time, would 8 games of Watkins be better than 14 games of Matthews? I argued yes, to that. And it ended up being 16 games of Watkins to 10 games of Matthews.
  3. How many games did his replacement play?
  4. I meant "underperforming" in relation to his health. He's missed WAY too much time. I don't like Watkins, the person. Watkins the football player has a ton of talent. I don't hold OBJ against him because I don't have a time machine. Its that simple. Because if Gaines is a one year rental, than we didn't get a starter for long. And if we pay him, then all the cap savings are null and void. Thats why it matters.
  5. Reminder that BADOL is a revisionist hack who argued time and time again that we needed to upgrade from the 2015 WR group (Watkins, Woods, Harvin, Goodwin, Hogan) and get a big body reciever. He constantly argued Woods was an upper tier #3 WR who could block. Now, it's all, "Taylor put up elite numbers with the great Robert Woods." You know we read your posts, right?
  6. Sammy in two years may be a very different individual.
  7. Gaines is underperforming too. Or do you like paying top end CB to China dolls hurt every other week?
  8. McD acquired White, Hyde and Poyer as starters, who have 13 picks between them. Go McD!
  9. It will come. BTW, I'd rather have Sammy than Zay at this point, his heir apparent on the Bills
  10. So far, yeah. Thing is, he's on the Rams if he puts it together. He's 24 years old.
  11. Sammy Watkins has elite talent. That's a fact.
  12. I was going to nominate you for best poster, but you left me off the must read list. Unsubscribe.
  13. SDS ain't in the bidness of paying for other writer's monetary platforms. Let's all take a step back and understand how the world works. Also, this is a bad click bait article, without even the decency to make it look presentable. I'd like to see less of this kinda stuff, even better, none at all.
  14. You could say this about TT too, but you don't, because you like him.
  15. Hackett did pretty good this year. Remember him? You and many others wanted him gone too.
  16. He wasn't terrible in the playoffs. He had a couple bad games. There is a difference.
  17. I know that. Hokie already said that. Are you gonna come with something new? When comprising a list of QB's that had 40 TD's or higher, it's "weird" I skipped a year where no one did so? Are you feeling okay little buddy?
  18. Wentz and/or Watson might've done it. Luck did it in 2014. Peyton 2013. Brees 2012. Brees, Rodgers, Stafford 2011. Half of that is enticing. LOL
  19. Ooooooh, 21 or 22!!! It's not like we in a world where QB's double that in a season. "Enticing" lol.
  20. 50 TD's over 3 seasons will certainly have teams salivating. Will he he have 16 or 17 next year?? Also PFR.
  21. Yes, he does. Not only does Goff out target TT to his WR's by a significant amount, in every year he's played, but Tyrod only had 1 season (his first) in which he targeted his RB less than 19% of the time. Tyrod has never targeted his WR's as much as Goff does. Even with Watkins, Harvin, Woods, Goodwin, Hogan. Also Tyrod did not do that in 2 of his first three years. 19% is not the new 18%, just like second is not the new first. Do you read the stuff you post, or are you more interested in defending your boy at all costs? PS: Do you think his low catch rate has to do with uncatchable throws?
  22. Ha ha Tyrod at his best year with a full complement of WR's couldn't throw to them more than a second year player. Thanks for making my point.
  23. Not relative to the total number of team targets. I have another math lesson for you! LA Rams targets to WR's as a percentage of total: 66.6% Buffalo Bills targets to WR's: 49.8% WOAH! I'm shocked, aren't you? LA Rams targets to RB's: 18.4% Buffalo Bills targets to RB's: 24.3% Woooooooooow. It's almost like our crappy QB throws to his RB's way more than another team with a competent QB does, and to his WR's less than another team with a competent QB does. Almost like I said that, word for word. Thanks for playing.
×
×
  • Create New...