Jump to content

BillsShredder83

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BillsShredder83

  1. atleast the good news on that is it was 'just' a peptide. not like he got caught with clomid or something indicating a full blown cycle, was some variant of an hgh secretagogue. something he wouldve been using likely to help with a prev injury/janky joints kinda thing. i dont think were looking at a cushing/merriman
  2. the longer this plays out, the more likely i need to call a doctor.... its been almost 12 hrs side note, i cant decide which would make me laugh more: rodgers sparring with an angry liberal media (his favorite) orrrrrrr "nahhhhh. im good, im gunna mail it in back in wisconsin" epic fan meltdowns. rich eisen mouning publicly along with schrager, one of the Mike's... i actually like all 3 of those, would make for some epic rants lol
  3. no shocker there. beane leaves outs, but owns up to his word if the player does what asked to do
  4. i think it all depends on how the draft falls. if we get a chance to draft a serious prospect, i dont think you pass it up because we have spencer brown. would much rather have one too many starters (hopefully), than roll the dice and end up wasting another year.
  5. would love to now see another early OL, and see brown (healthy), play to the potential we saw when we drafted him. good drafts dont mean chitt without player development. we need one or more of our wildcard OL to make a healthy step up!
  6. this sounds a lot like an early investment into the position in the draft then? asking honestly
  7. Just no. blows my mind that ppl are ready to give up on a player so fast. we took him knowing he needed a year to bulk up. maybe that combined with a 3 LBer scheme, could be very interesting
  8. i dont disagree, just sucks to have the best NCB in the game, have given him a nice contract, and now hes a very situational player? Nobody shoot me here, but if theoretically we go back to a 4-3, what would taron's trade value be? not advocating it, just thinking of questions beanes sorting through
  9. My goodness, what a freaking all around blessing thatd be. holes from poyer and edmunds sounds huge, but when you consider we already played last year with only 1 of 2 of our safeties, its a bit easier to swallow.
  10. its been up and down. im not blind to the unseen effect he had on the defense, dude was a teddy washington NT for our secondary, made everyones (coverage) job easier. horrible analogy but it made me laugh and works in spirit. im a lil bummed out while understanding theres 0.00% chance we were offering 18m **********BIG QUESTION NOW: Do we see a more traditional 4-3? If so, how do we handle Taron? Asking those two makes mre think no. So who should i be keeping an eye out for draft/FA wise? @GunnerBill i honestly dunno what teams play nickel the way that we do?
  11. who dis?
  12. hasnt he been hurt a bunch the last 2 years? (edit: he has not, but felt like he lived on injury report last season) that was def AK
  13. Hows mcg's driving? make full stops? look both ways at intersections?
  14. this is false... but i dont think hes a realistic target anyways
  15. finally we agree
  16. Mcdaniels is black remember? thats why SF gets the whole 3rd round to themselves
  17. so an always hurt qb, being hurt, is less flukey than josh missing a weird pass? ok
  18. is THE factor
  19. first 3 are due to being targeted for the first time in his career. i always think back to champ baileys prime year stats. if you just looked at the stat lines youd think he had 0 snaps lol
  20. isnt that exactly what theyre aiming for? we should only be hiring minority asst gm's, positional coaches, slap some bows and ribbons on them (mitch trubisky style) and let the comp picks flow actually reward teams for not resigning minority candidates. THATLL WORK! LOL
  21. dude will work his ass off and drown that knee in peptides (tb500/bpc157), possibly work some growth in there, and be fiiiiiiiine
  22. hynes contrct is pretty ugly no? theres potential there but we havent seen it in indy and didnt see it here (other than St's). very risky move to bring him back contract as is watched his highlight video. it showed 9 tds inside the 5yd line, and all but two were from the 1 or 2. all his tds werent in that video, but solid sample size
  23. itd be fine for a year. if diggs is really that far gone (i dont think he is), bringing in a player hes already lobbied for wouldnt be the tipping point on it and were already going there
  24. not to mention, youre leaving a few teams ahead of you that could trade out of that spot, start a qb run and miss out all together
  25. one OL and not till 5th, cant ghet behind this as a whole
×
×
  • Create New...