BillsShredder83

no shocker there. beane leaves outs, but owns up to his word if the player does what asked to do

i think it all depends on how the draft falls. if we get a chance to draft a serious prospect, i dont think you pass it up because we have spencer brown. would much rather have one too many starters (hopefully), than roll the dice and end up wasting another year.

would love to now see another early OL, and see brown (healthy), play to the potential we saw when we drafted him. good drafts dont mean chitt without player development. we need one or more of our wildcard OL to make a healthy step up!

this sounds a lot like an early investment into the position in the draft then? asking honestly

Just no. blows my mind that ppl are ready to give up on a player so fast. we took him knowing he needed a year to bulk up. maybe that combined with a 3 LBer scheme, could be very interesting

i dont disagree, just sucks to have the best NCB in the game, have given him a nice contract, and now hes a very situational player? Nobody shoot me here, but if theoretically we go back to a 4-3, what would taron's trade value be? not advocating it, just thinking of questions beanes sorting through

My goodness, what a freaking all around blessing thatd be. holes from poyer and edmunds sounds huge, but when you consider we already played last year with only 1 of 2 of our safeties, its a bit easier to swallow.

its been up and down. im not blind to the unseen effect he had on the defense, dude was a teddy washington NT for our secondary, made everyones (coverage) job easier. horrible analogy but it made me laugh and works in spirit. im a lil bummed out while understanding theres 0.00% chance we were offering 18m **********BIG QUESTION NOW: Do we see a more traditional 4-3? If so, how do we handle Taron? Asking those two makes mre think no. So who should i be keeping an eye out for draft/FA wise? @GunnerBill i honestly dunno what teams play nickel the way that we do?

who dis?

hasnt he been hurt a bunch the last 2 years? (edit: he has not, but felt like he lived on injury report last season) that was def AK

Hows mcg's driving? make full stops? look both ways at intersections?

this is false... but i dont think hes a realistic target anyways

finally we agree

Mcdaniels is black remember? thats why SF gets the whole 3rd round to themselves

so an always hurt qb, being hurt, is less flukey than josh missing a weird pass? ok

is THE factor

first 3 are due to being targeted for the first time in his career. i always think back to champ baileys prime year stats. if you just looked at the stat lines youd think he had 0 snaps lol

isnt that exactly what theyre aiming for? we should only be hiring minority asst gm's, positional coaches, slap some bows and ribbons on them (mitch trubisky style) and let the comp picks flow actually reward teams for not resigning minority candidates. THATLL WORK! LOL

dude will work his ass off and drown that knee in peptides (tb500/bpc157), possibly work some growth in there, and be fiiiiiiiine

hynes contrct is pretty ugly no? theres potential there but we havent seen it in indy and didnt see it here (other than St's). very risky move to bring him back contract as is watched his highlight video. it showed 9 tds inside the 5yd line, and all but two were from the 1 or 2. all his tds werent in that video, but solid sample size

itd be fine for a year. if diggs is really that far gone (i dont think he is), bringing in a player hes already lobbied for wouldnt be the tipping point on it and were already going there

not to mention, youre leaving a few teams ahead of you that could trade out of that spot, start a qb run and miss out all together

one OL and not till 5th, cant ghet behind this as a whole

WTF does this mean? thats a new one Dominator - 46.5% college dom (97th pctile)

when did that start? i swear i remember kc asking hill to do it 3 years ago and him publically proclaiming no