Numark3

lol, people hated it. http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/178054-rd-2-pick-50-db-ronald-darby-florida-state/ But yes, rational people saw the point. Same here

Plus, this is our 4th CB draft in round 1....since 1999 This is no more than the league average, but don't let facts get in the way of anything

You can do that with any position. Plus, you use 4-5 CBs a lot throughout the season, its important to have some really good ones. You need to do both, hence why we sill another CB drafted.

And then you could complain how he would have been available later in the round (and you would actually be right)

Just because the bills have been a joke doesn't excuse fans from also becoming a joke

or the opposite...

so should we just not play with good CBs. Since they are too expensive to keep after 5 years? Don't draft them high or resign them!

People cant have it both ways. You can't argue CBs aren't important enough to draft in the first, and then also say they should have paid 14 million to a CB. The bills aren't building the team through the secondary, hence them paying money to the front seven and letting the secondary walk lol

You have essentially become a parody account. Nice

They finally have a hard schedule this year. They are a prime team to fall off

cool

No I meant what I posted. My points were that it is a very odd and recent trend of people calling others beta on the internet. And two, no one will think someone is alpha on the internet for namecalling. And I mean those points specifically (calling someone beta). I dont really care about this argument as I honestly didn't read the article haha. Or the whiteknight comment, I got that. It's the "beta" thing that is really odd. Same with people calling people cucks. It's just an odd insult imo. I don't have a stake in this argument

Is there anything odder or more ignorant than calling people beta? It seems really new and random. And FYI, no one will think you are ALPHAAAAAA by calling guys beta online

This isn't on point at all. The city is stuck paying over 140 million dollars of debt for the stadium that no longer has the rams. If the billionaire team owners want to keep forcing cities to pay for their stadium (lol), they should have to pay any debts the city has once they jump ship to a new city in my opinion. PS, Oakland taxpayers still have 85 million dollars to pay off for their 1995 stadium for the raiders. Super fair!

The future lol

Grumble grumble this will make games long grumble grumble ignoring the fact the number of challenges won't change grumble grumble.

Agreed. The negative Nancy's out there won't have any of it, but we have some solid players already in the secondary. And anothe refer agent signing and draft pick or two will go a long way. Plus for a non Rex Ryan team, having a good front 7 should really help. After all, the point of investing and building a front 7 is so you don't have to invest as much in the secondary.

Oh I don't disagree. Just pointing that our DB has undergone a lot of change, gutted seems accurate imo

Our safeties are gone too

I don't think you know what a trade is...

I believe he did not actually have a drop last season. Also was solid in playoffs

The whole are S, TE2, RT, LB, CB, WR2? That sounds pretty accurate. I think they can still get sole free agency help, draft sole help, get depth for other positions, and only have a hole or two going into the season which isn't huge.

Boy a lot of people have an opinion on someone they have never watched based on either nothing, what they read, or something they heard on the radio. He's a good #3 with actual potential.

FYI, your whole post is nonsensical as it is not copyrighted material and the fair use law doesn't apply.

lol I also wish the bills didn't get depth or participate in free agency for late round draft picks in 2018