Numark3

... so dumb

Isnt this amount only a fraction of what he demanded for a wall? How is this a win. was there anything that could’ve happened where the people that always support trump would say he lost? And vice versa when you side with someone every single time, you gotta wonder how much thought you are putting into it. Not necessarily you, but a lot of the “trump won” crowd.

I don’t mind a lot of her views, but unfortunately, she is one of the worst people I have ever interacted with. She is absolutely nasty, and it’s a well-known secret that she treats her staff as bad as it gets. I cant stand her.

Iv never seen the Kathy tran stuff, but seems consistent with the bill! I’m okay with late term abortions, it’s the after birth stuff that would give me me a lot of pause (to say the least)

that doesn’t mean they weren’t right. I hate seeing this argument about polling and probabilities.

I think he will sign it and go an alternative route for the wall. Which will face very strong legal resistance.

"refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it?

Why don’t you keep posting your fake news about no medical reason existing for a late term abortion

I have never mentioned PP, but um ok. I am only talking about this stupid tweet that says: it’s impossible for a pregnancy complication endangering the woman’s life to occur (that could be alleviated through an abortion) in late term.

So CNN can’t use pro-abortion doctors but you can keep citing to a tweet from an ultra conservative and pro-lifer??? What about this from The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Medical conditions where fetus is not viable in late-term pregnancy: “Many abortions that occur later in pregnancy involve fetal anomalies incompatible with life, such as anencephaly, the absence of the brain and cranium above the base of the skull, or limb-body wall complex, when the organs develop outside of the body cavityii. In these cases, where death is likely before or shortly after birth, patients may decide whether to continue the pregnancy and deliver a nonviable fetus or have an abortion.” Medical conditions where carrying the fetus to full term could endanger the woman’s health: “Abortion later in pregnancy may also be necessary when complications severely compromise a woman’s health or life, conditions which may also reduce the possibility of fetal survival. These might include premature rupture of membranes and infection, preeclampsia, placental abruption, and placenta accreta. Women in these circumstances may risk extensive blood loss, stroke, and septic shock that could lead to maternal death. Politicians must never require a doctor to wait for a medical condition to worsen and become life-threatening before being able to provide evidence-based care to their patients, including an abortion.” Source: https://m.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Government-Relations-and-Outreach/Facts-are-Important-Abortion-Care-Later-in-Pregnancy-is-Important-to-Womens-Health?IsMobileSet=true These bills allow for abortion under these circumstances. But keep rambling about infanticide. The ACOG statement lists specific medical conditions. Please refute them since you post on every page how these medical conditions don’t exist. seriously, that copy and paste took two minutes of googling... edit: with all the ***** that can go wrong, it is outrageous for someone to say nothing can occur in a pregnancy that could endanger a mothers life, or that an abortion couldn’t alleviate those dangers.

I want MORE black face admissions, forget the sexual assault!

I mean, that’s a Chris Rock bit....

No way!

Lol it must count, don’t go changing the rules!

Lol you have so many nonsensical posts. As in, they lack a lot of logic or point.

Hasn’t a wealth of people from the left called for his resignation days ago. I keep seeing stuff about the left not saying anything and being hypocritical AND the left calling for him because they have to. which is it?

Sad!

Fair point. But the divide in voting regarding education seems to be well established before trump took office, I think it’s a little misleading to imply the percentage of salary increase has anything to do with it. It was a very small point of mine lol. I figured it has to do with arguments I’m not a part of haha. It’s something over my head!

I figured that’s what you meant. I don’t fully agree, but I know what you mean.

Yea not making a point about minimum wages. Just raised an eyebrow at a post seemingly connecting the economy being better for lower income workers (not necessarily true) with voting patterns.

Isnt that what he meant by target? How am I a combatant? eh, this is not my type of conversation lol.

They can be, but punitive damages are going to have other factors limiting them. And regardless, it’s not a billion dollar case!

I don’t know if it’s connected to minimum wage laws. That seems complicated. im just talking about the general principal that if salaries are rising, wouldn’t lower salaries generally reflect a higher percentage increase? Like, on a basic math and common sense level (granted, I’m bad at common sense and math, which is why I am asking).

I don’t put my political affiliation...I don’t mind dipping into both the political ponds. And us libs have a copious amount of sex, don’t have to spend time at church or volunteering.

Yea, and someone who memes all day and spreads lies is an idiot, in my opinion. And no, we are not all combatants. But that’s another topic.