Numark3

I don’t understand how he had a better percentage than Rosen today!? I thought college stats were perfect predictors and that quality of teammates don’t matter???

I get it, but he clearly gave himself up, the refs blew the whistle and signaled the play dead, what is he supposed to do? Still be laying there?

People are going to kill him regardless. And it is easy to say because it’s true

You mean every qb ever?

Can you explain how he was not aware??? “Hey you know when you went to the ground and all your team mates jumped on you, and the refs signaled the play dead...”

Yea this is very dumb. That play is clearly dead, is always called dead, and has never not been called dead.

Yup, a young qb made a dumb play. Who cares?

Grow up and learn football

He isn’t very smart

Maybe for the fans it is... Sure Yes, a player is being misused. It has happened thousands of times in sports. Do you have theories of why Tolbert was overused? Why Freddy Jackson wasn’t given a chance for awhile. Why spiller was underused? Think about what you’re saying. It is ridiculous, I’m sorry. Maybe there are packages or plays you don’t run to keep that under wraps, but not letting a running back touch the ball at all for three weeks for the purpose of surprising a week 4 game is wildly outrageous.

Yea because I said game tape is useless (rolls eye).... That wasn't the absurd part. The absurd part is a theory a team would not use a play maker for the reason of not having gametape on him for a week 4 matchup. Give me one example of an nfl team not using a player for a month so they could unleash him in a regular season game. You can't, that is why its absurd.

If you figured out this secret by watching games, I think the patriots can crack the code... its td not like Singletary is this unique player that is going to be unleashed and does things no RB does so you can’t gameplan for him without tape. It’s an absurd theory

This narrative of conservative play calling in the third quarter is going to hurt my head. It. Did. Not. Happen. Not moving the ball does not equal conservative play calling. We took a lot of penalties and the giants had a pass rush all of a sudden.

You have it backwards. Your QB taking those hits becomes a continuous thing without these types of plays and attitude.

he has to hit the hole harder running out of your own endzone. That was inexcusable, but honestly just a brainfart. Otherwise, he was never given a chance, don't know how anyone can say he looks dumb.

What? Bell often slipped through and we missed the first tackle, but that is par for the course with him. They did an excellent job getting the second and third guy there

That one is true, otherwise I agree with you. Star and Murphy have two of the four biggest cap hits on the team, and they extended Hughes to a big contract. So three of the four biggest cap hits are on the DL. That's spending big money. But yea, I agree with you 100%. He just makes a ton of mistakes

Very true! But he also ***** up that play

Imagine if the bills didn't play like children in the first half! Also, Gore side-hopping on the safety was abysmal. Need to just hit your hole running

Or just keep popping into the topic and not adding anything of value. It isn't like someone can't google this for 5 minutes and figure it out.

Pulling the "i know more about this" card without actually arguing is super not helpful. Plenty of dumb people go to law school. Plenty of people go to law school and don't become lawyers. Plenty of people go to law school and are bad lawyers. Going to law school is not difficult to do. Why don't you actually explain why its illegal so we can learn (I dont know anything about this but its interesting).

Ouch! Whats your state, I’ll teach you some rights the government has given people.

This is a nice paragraph if we were in a high school civil class, or in a college philosophy class. But not when it comes to the law on this country. You are blatantly wrong. You keep mentioning inalienable rights, discounting there are other rights. It’s very stupid.

Ummmm. Wouldn’t we all have that factor (“you”) as a common denominator? Its kinda inherent in you being in the argument....

Hahaha so you both think the only legal rights are those that are inalienable, and the rest are legal privileges? What is this based on, philosophy? in the real world, and in this country, you have many legal “rights.” For example, in certain circumstances, a landlord may have a “right of entry.” Surely that’s not an inalienable right. No, it’s a right given to landlords by statute. while you may both think constitutional law is the basis of most laws, it’s not. 99% of our laws come elsewhere, and some give legal rights to people. I know this may seem crazy.