I don’t know what this has to do with you being in a 5th grade class. Just asked why you in elementary school?
Your words, not mine.
also, that was an impressive incoherent ramble lol
Yes, and it’s still wildly dumb. Saying something has no evidence does not shield it from being dumb.
anyways, moving on from that conspiracy theory....
how long does everyone think this whistleblower issue is going to dominate the news?
What, where he wrote like 5 paragraphs to a straightforward yes or no question? That’s exactly what predicted.
the dude is longwinded. I’d tutor him on writing for free
You cant quote one false thing from me. But I can of you
You fail to understand. People don’t want to engage with your substance because it is childish and patently nutty. Don’t confuse that with people not being able to handle or because they are sheeple.
its literally because you are a weird internet oddity. I know that won’t sink in, but’s it true
Dude, your writing is terrible. You are the only one here that can ramble for 10 paragraphs without saying anything. And you and drought are the only one she keep posting objectively false stuff
I am happy you are back to riding DR! Your original stuff was yikes lol
Don't recall anyone eh?
Yeaaaaa. Maybe you shouldn't argue with me. No conflict. No hearsay. And you were also wrong about saying we weren't talking about legal hearsay lol
Ya sure? (I'll give you a hint who)
Well yea man. He posts all that amazing content (twitter posts and ramblings akin to a 12 year old reddit user)
Why don’t you just go ramble more about the whistleblower complaint conflicting with the transcript. It’s funny how each of you clowns have been objectively wrong in the past 24 hours.
must be tough
How many wrong things you can you say?
Was there a conflict? no.
And were we talking about the legal definition of hearsay? Or not?