Jump to content

Numark3

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Numark3

  1. No its not. Second hand knowledge does not equal hearsay. It really is not a difficult concept to grasp.
  2. People should have called for impeachment for that!!!
  3. Wait lol. How is trump face down at the bottom of an escalator him dead....?
  4. I don’t know what this has to do with you being in a 5th grade class. Just asked why you in elementary school? Your words, not mine. also, that was an impressive incoherent ramble lol
  5. Im dying to hear why you are in a 5th grade class lol.
  6. Yes, and it’s still wildly dumb. Saying something has no evidence does not shield it from being dumb. anyways, moving on from that conspiracy theory.... how long does everyone think this whistleblower issue is going to dominate the news?
  7. Not that evidence! Evidence that DR can understand. Maybe if it’s in a tweet form he can understand? You are in a 5th grade class? Haha wow
  8. Well we know you have no proof because that’s an idiotic thing you just said.
  9. I don’t know how anyone can read that and not realize we have a think-skinned president who is pretty dumb.
  10. Uh that first choice lol. Gosh what a group group of intellectuals we have here defending our big wet president
  11. Brrrrrr, this deep state war sure is hot lol.
  12. Arent you a 9/11 truther? Or am I confusing you with some other good
  13. What, where he wrote like 5 paragraphs to a straightforward yes or no question? That’s exactly what predicted. the dude is longwinded. I’d tutor him on writing for free
  14. Good luck getting a yes or no out of him This is someone’s answer to a yes or no question. What a guy
  15. Thats my favorite one (“serious person”) dont you want to be a serious person and ramble to spread info on a Bills forum?
  16. Me no read! (ignoring that education tends to lean left)
  17. You cant quote one false thing from me. But I can of you You fail to understand. People don’t want to engage with your substance because it is childish and patently nutty. Don’t confuse that with people not being able to handle or because they are sheeple. its literally because you are a weird internet oddity. I know that won’t sink in, but’s it true
  18. Dude, your writing is terrible. You are the only one here that can ramble for 10 paragraphs without saying anything. And you and drought are the only one she keep posting objectively false stuff I am happy you are back to riding DR! Your original stuff was yikes lol
  19. Only brought up my job because DR brought up his. And you all ran with it. Oh well
  20. Don't recall anyone eh? Yeaaaaa. Maybe you shouldn't argue with me. No conflict. No hearsay. And you were also wrong about saying we weren't talking about legal hearsay lol Ya sure? (I'll give you a hint who) Well yea man. He posts all that amazing content (twitter posts and ramblings akin to a 12 year old reddit user)
  21. Why don’t you just go ramble more about the whistleblower complaint conflicting with the transcript. It’s funny how each of you clowns have been objectively wrong in the past 24 hours. must be tough How many wrong things you can you say? Was there a conflict? no. And were we talking about the legal definition of hearsay? Or not?
×
×
  • Create New...